201 Hospital Drive, Meyersdale, PA 15552
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Meyersdale Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Costs & Pricing
Meyersdale Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center presents competitive pricing in comparison to both Somerset County and the broader Pennsylvania state averages. For semi-private rooms, the monthly cost at Meyersdale is $5,992, which exceeds the county's average of $4,053 but significantly surpasses the state's lower average of $3,542. In the case of private rooms, Meyersdale aligns its rate with local standards at $6,155; however, this figure notably rises above Pennsylvania's average of $4,890. This pricing structure reflects Meyersdale's commitment to providing specialized care and amenities that may not be available at lower-cost facilities, making it essential for potential residents and their families to weigh both the financial implications and the quality of care when considering their options.
| Floor plans | Meyersdale Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | Somerset County | Pennsylvania |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $5,992 | $4,053 | $3,542 |
| Private | $6,155 | $6,155 | $4,890 |
Overall Review of Meyersdale Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center
Pros
The staff are very friendly and attentive.- The patient was very happy with the care provided.
- The social worker Lisa Cherry is amazing.
- The administrator was an amazing woman who truly cared about her residents.
- The nursing director and the nurse were kind and respectful and followed up on additional needs.
- The staff kept families updated on the patient’s condition.
- Nursing, dietary, housekeeping, laundry, and activity departments are all amazing.
- The staff found a specialist for him when needed.
Cons
The new owners are worse than dealing with a slumlord.- Since the takeover, there has been no money for activities, proper staffing, or decent supplies.
- Agency staff are described as treating residents like insiders on assignment rather than as people.
- Most mistreatment is attributed to second-shift agency workers (about 95% of the second shift).
- The owners are said to be doing the minimum.
- The kitchen reportedly cannot follow menus due to insufficient funding.
- The administrator is viewed as unreasonable, and there is a perceived lack of help and activities.
- The facility is described as a disgrace, with concerns about abuse of sick and elderly residents.
Review
This community is best suited for families that value hands-on, attentive frontline caregiving and can tolerate variability in administration and program funding. Residents who need reliable daily nursing attention, compassionate support from the social work team, and a staff-led culture of basic warmth will find redeeming qualities here. Those who prioritize a stable, well-funded activities calendar, consistently overseen med management, and steady executive leadership may want to consider alternatives.
The strongest, most consistent positives lie in the caregiving core. Across several reviews, nursing, dietary, housekeeping, and activity teams are praised for their dedication and capability. The social work staff, particularly Lisa Cherry in one account, demonstrates a rare ability to push for real outcomes and coordinate supports that families value when facing complex transitions. In moments of crisis or end-of-life care, residents and families report kindness, clear communication, and thoughtful attention that can make difficult days feel more manageable. When staff are present and engaged, the facility delivers genuine comfort, safety, and responsive caregiving that many families require.
Yet the most serious strains are structural and policy-driven, not about individual caregivers. Ownership changes have restructured the facility’s name and resource priorities, and several reviews condemn a shift toward leaner staffing, reduced activities, and insufficient supplies. The second-shift reliance on agency workers is repeatedly linked to inconsistent care and perceived mistreatment, undermining trust and continuity. Administrative decisions, whether about budgeting for menus, activities, or staff levels, are cited as the root cause of many disappointments, with families noting a visible decline since the transition. A handful of experiences also point to gaps in communication, delays in meds or daily care, and treatment that feels transactional rather than resident-centered.
These tensions do not erase the value of the positive caregiving observed when the right people are on shift. The pros, the compassionate nursing presence, the competent and caring roles of dietary and housekeeping staff, and the evident willingness of certain team members to advocate for residents, can offset a great deal when families are engaged and the resident’s routine can be anchored by dependable staff who remember preferences and medical histories. Where administrators were responsive and proactive, families report smoother transfers, attentive follow-through, and moments when the facility truly felt like a home. In end-of-life or comfort-focused scenarios, the care staff have demonstrated the ability to meet meaningful expectations, which matters deeply for families navigating tough decisions.
For families considering alternatives, the red flags are clear: if ongoing staffing instability, limited activity programming, or inconsistent med management will be intolerable, this community may not meet those expectations over the long haul. If administration turnover and budget-driven constraints are likely to erode daily quality, or if a robust social calendar and consistently well-funded nourishment are nonnegotiables, exploring other local options is prudent. Prospective residents with substantial needs for highly predictable schedules or with families seeking unwavering administrative steadiness should weigh options elsewhere.
Practical next steps anchor the decision. Schedule a focused tour with the nursing director and the social worker to understand staffing patterns, agency usage, and how meds, pain control, and daily routines are actually managed on the floor. Ask for a current activities calendar and a candid explanation of any funding gaps impacting programming. Speak with current residents and family members about consistency of care across shifts, especially on weekends. Compare this facility’s performance against nearby options in terms of staffing ratios, activity offerings, and dietary oversight. If choosing Meyersdale, establish a communication plan with frontline caregivers and appoint a primary point of contact so that concerns can be addressed promptly, ensuring the resident’s comfort and safety remain the priority.
99 resident community capacity
Skilled Nursing Facility
Air-conditioning
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Private bathrooms
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Concierge services
Planned day trips
Understanding the Sandwich Generation: Stress and Responsibilities for Multigenerational Caregivers
8 Essential Assistive Devices for Older Adults
Navigating the Financial Road to Nursing Home Care: In-Depth Guidance and Resources
