Enid Senior Care

Pros

• The facility provides opportunities for staff to engage in fun activities, such as hosting hamburger fries in the courtyard.
• The team is proactive in providing medical care, as evidenced by sending residents to the hospital for necessary treatments like new feeding tubes.
• The staff appears dedicated to maintaining a lively atmosphere for their personnel, which can foster a positive work environment.
• Residents have access to outdoor areas where they can observe events and activities happening around them.

Cons

• The facility is dirty and poorly managed.
• The funds are mismanaged, leading to inadequate care.
• The staff's inability to maintain feeding tubes resulted in unnecessary hospital visits.
• Residents are excluded from activities, such as the courtyard hamburger fry event, which are only for staff personnel.

Review

In recent evaluations of a certain care facility, several concerning issues have come to the forefront, painting a troubling picture of the environment and quality of service provided. A recurring theme in these reviews is the cleanliness and management of the facility, which many residents and their families found lacking. The overall maintenance and hygiene standards appear to be subpar, contributing to an uncomfortable atmosphere for those who rely on the establishment for care. Such deficiencies can significantly affect residents' well-being and comfort, making it essential for management to address these fundamental concerns urgently.

One particularly troubling aspect highlighted by one resident's experience is related to food services in the facility. Although this individual was unable to provide personal feedback on the meals due to being reliant on a feeding tube, they expressed dissatisfaction with how food resources were managed overall. This indicates potential inefficiencies or mismanagement in kitchen operations that could lead not only to subpar meal service but also impact nutritional support for residents experiencing various health challenges.

The review mentioned that the funds within the facility are not managed well, leading to operational dilemmas that directly affect patient care. One pertinent example given was a situation where inadequate attention resulted in clogged feeding tubes for residents who depended on them. In this case, instead of addressing the issue promptly within their own resources, staff had no choice but to send this individual out for emergency medical treatment at a hospital—not only inconveniencing them but also burdening external healthcare services unnecessarily. This incident raises significant red flags about both emergency preparedness within the facility’s own staff and overall prioritization of resident care needs.

Moreover, there seems to be a distinct lack of inclusivity regarding activities organized by employees at the facility. A specific instance pointed out was that while staff enjoyed outdoor events such as barbecues featuring hamburgers and fries held in the courtyard—an initiative presumably meant to boost morale or community spirit—residents were not allowed participation during these lighter moments. This division between staff enjoyment and resident exclusion echoes larger systemic issues within institutional settings that often fail to create an engaging environment for all parties involved.

Such policies of separation can foster feelings of isolation among residents who may already grapple with physical limitations or emotional distress from their circumstances. It breeds an atmosphere where recreational opportunities feel restricted rather than inclusive—a critical oversight since social engagement is vital for mental health and overall satisfaction among those residing in long-term care facilities.

Ultimately, these reviews underscore a desperate need for improved management practices focusing on enhancing cleanliness standards, food service efficiency, financial transparency regarding resource allocation, and creating more inclusive environments that foster connection between staff and residents alike. The experiences shared highlight urgent areas that require attention if this care facility intends not just to meet basic health requirements but also improve quality of life for its residents through thoughtful engagement initiatives while maintaining safety standards with accountability at its core. Without addressing these integral elements head-on, both current operations and future viability may remain under scrutiny from those seeking collaborative solutions in elder care environments.

Pharmacies

• Family Pharmacy (0.4 miles)
• Family Pharmacy (1.6 miles)
• Family Pharmacy (Dielrx) (1.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3 miles)
• Scheffe Prescription Shop West (3.6 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (4 miles)
• Evans Express Pharmacy (4.9 miles)

Places of Worship

• Trinity Baptist Church (0.9 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (0.9 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (1.4 miles)
• House of Prayer (1.6 miles)
• Calvary Assembly of God (2.6 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (2.6 miles)
• Catholic Church of St Francis Xavier (2.7 miles)

Restaurants

• A Fuego Pizzeria (1 miles)
• The Shack (1.3 miles)
• Tacos El Gordo (1.3 miles)
• Panevino (2.3 miles)
• Cafe Garcia (2.3 miles)
• Lenox Drive In (2.3 miles)
• Frisco Bar (2.4 miles)

Physicians

• Integris (1.7 miles)
• Chris Shearer, DO (1.7 miles)
• F Javier Barajas, MD (1.7 miles)
• Lee, Christopher - Saint Marys Womens Health and Wellness (1.8 miles)
• St Mary's Physician Associates (1.8 miles)
• Women's Health & Wellness (1.8 miles)
• Enid Eye Clinic (1.8 miles)

Cafes

• Rendezvous Club & Cafe (3 miles)
• Da Vinci’s (3 miles)
• Farmhouse Fresh (4.4 miles)

Transportation

• Kiwanis Rides (3.5 miles)
• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (4.1 miles)
• Enterprise Rent-A-Car (4.4 miles)
• Rockwood/Willow Bus Stop (4.6 miles)
• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (8.9 miles)

Parks

• Meadowlake Park (3.5 miles)
• LaMesa Park (5.2 miles)