21585 Peabody Street, Leonardtown, MD 20650
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of St. Mary's Nursing Center
Pros
It is great.
They are very helpful and accommodating on the phone.
The place is very nice.
The family found the place very nice.
Cons
The facility initially claimed there was a bed and then rescinded it, forcing an 81-year-old wife to drive to a facility in another county instead of one closer to home.
They seem to only want patients who require no effort.
The memory care unit reportedly smells like feces, is severely understaffed, and management refuses to provide wipes, chux pads, a full meal, or adequate ventilation.
The unit does not answer the phone, leaving a loved one in pain.
The facility is old and outdated and constantly smells horrible; residents are left in soiled conditions and staff appear to neglect them.
Therapy time is minimal: upon admission, a discharge plan is set, and residents receive only one hour of total therapy per day (OT and PT combined).
Some reviewers describe cruel treatment and neglect by staff.
Review
St. Mary’s Nursing Center in Leonardtown, MD is best suited for families needing a brief, supervised stay or respite care where the primary advantage is a responsive intakes process and a generally pleasant looking setting, especially when other local options are limited. It can work for those who want to coordinate a short admission with a facility that will take calls and arrange discharge planning promptly. For long-term, daily needs, however, this community is not the strongest choice, and expectations should be aligned with what the facility reliably delivers in the near term.
Those who should consider alternatives are anyone prioritizing robust, ongoing memory-care support, consistent daily hygiene, and reliable staff presence. Multiple reviews point to a memory-care unit that feels understaffed and inadequately supervised, with significant concerns about cleanliness and basic care. Several families report odors and a pattern of caregivers not responding in a timely fashion, along with uncomfortable questions about how meals, ventilation, and day-to-day supervision are managed. With the facility described as old and outdated by some visitors, the risk is that long-term residents may experience declining conditions if staffing and maintenance do not improve. If safety, dignity, and consistent, around-the-clock attention are non-negotiable, alternatives should be weighed carefully.
The main upsides, the ones that can sometimes tilt a decision toward this community, center on accessibility of intake help and a generally pleasant overall environment, plus a willingness to assist with discharge planning and short-term arrangements. For families navigating a transition, the ability to connect with staff by phone in the early stages can reduce the sense of uncertainty. A respite stay, should it be the chosen path, can provide a rough sense of how daily care will feel in practice, and some families report the facility feels nice enough and responsive at the outset. Yet these advantages are often overshadowed by recurring, more serious concerns about daily care quality, especially on units housing memory-care residents.
The most persistent red flags are hard to ignore. Reports of poor hygiene, strong odors, and inconsistent supervision on the memory-care unit paint a troubling picture for anyone considering long-term placement. Instances where staff are perceived as unresponsive or where residents are not promptly attended to during meals or routine checks raise questions about safety and dignity. Admissions logistics, such as being told a bed is available and then having that bed rescinded, forcing families to seek care further away, highlight reliability problems that could disrupt important family plans and resident stability. An old, dated facility with limited ventilation and inadequate meals compounds these concerns and should push families to compare other options that can deliver steadier daily care.
When making a decision, practical steps matter: request a current staffing snapshot for the floors you’ll rely on, review actual daily routines for therapy versus what’s promised, and insist on a clear, written plan for meals, housekeeping, and infection-control practices. Schedule a tour focused on the memory-care unit, note cleanliness, odor, and how residents are supervised, and ask to speak directly with a nurse or administrator about care protocols and the facility’s escalation process for concerns. Verify how discharge planning is structured in reality, not just on paper, and ask for recent examples to gauge consistency. Inquire about room conditions, maintenance responsiveness, and whether the facility can guarantee near-home proximity, stability in admission, and reliable transportation if needed.
Bottom line: St. Mary’s Nursing Center offers a viable option for short-term respite and for families that prize accessible intake coordination and a otherwise pleasant setting in a tight local market. For families prioritizing steady, high-quality daily care, especially in memory care, and for those who cannot tolerate odor, understaffing, or inconsistent responsiveness, stronger alternatives exist and should be explored. The decision hinges on balancing the value of prompt admission and a decent initial impression against the weighty, ongoing needs of a resident who requires dependable, attentive care every day.






Urinary Tract Infections in Older Adults: Comprehensive Insights on Symptoms, Treatment, and Prevention
California's Form 602A: An In-Depth Examination of Senior Care Assessment
Comprehensive Look at Senior Blood Pressure Charts: Normal and Elevated Levels by Age