Summer Commons
Save21 June Street, Sanford, ME 04073
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Summer Commons offers competitive pricing for its private room accommodations, with a monthly cost of $4,700. This rate positions it slightly lower than the average in York County, where similar private rooms are priced at approximately $4,726. When compared to the broader context of Maine, Summer Commons remains attractively priced against the statewide average of $4,625. Overall, Summer Commons provides an excellent option for those seeking comfortable living arrangements while balancing affordability in comparison to nearby counties and statewide trends.
| Floor plans | Summer Commons | York County | Maine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $4,700 | $4,726 | $4,625 |
Summer Commons is portrayed in these accounts as a facility that can truly feel like a hopeful home for loved ones, while also exposing stubborn gaps that can undermine care when operations are stretched too thin. On the positive side, several families speak with genuine warmth about what their relatives experienced at move-in and in the weeks that followed. One reviewer describes a mother who, after serious injuries, found a setting that felt remarkably clean when she arrived and where staff members were consistently welcoming. They highlight a lively atmosphere with weekly musical visits and regular opportunities for residents to dance, bake cookies, and tend gardens. The sense of hospitality extends into the lobby and beyond: greeting staff, attentive questions about how the patient is settling in, and a tangible feeling that the person's needs - and new friendships - are being attended to. For families, this combination of cleanliness, a friendly welcome, and social engagement creates a strong impression of a place that genuinely cares.
In several anecdotes, the facility is celebrated for the small touches that can make a big difference in daily life. The accounts describe a community where activities like cookie baking and gardening are not mere to-dos but meaningful routines that help residents feel engaged and valued. Relatives repeatedly note that staff appear warm, and that, regardless of who is visiting, there is a sense of steadiness and positive energy at the front desk and in the hallways. The personal stories extend across generations: a mother, a grandmother, and a great aunt each are portrayed as receiving attentive, compassionate care, with family members expressing relief and confidence that their loved ones are well cared for and are building friendships within the facility.
Yet, the same set of reviews lays out a stark, recurring counter-narrative about the inner workings of the place. A common thread is that operations inside Summer Commons can feel chaotic, and that the facility struggles to "support your loved ones" without persistent advocacy from family members. Several reviewers point to chronic understaffing as a core issue, suggesting that the number of caregivers on each shift is insufficient to meet the demands of residents. Beyond sheer numbers, there is concern about the level of training and the adoption of up-to-date, evidence-based care. In particular, the reviews criticize the rehabilitation approach: physical therapy is described as offering a plateau rather than a robust, goal-oriented program, with the implication that therapists may not be employing the most current models and techniques. The critique extends to claims that the facility has not embraced a widely respected approach like the Biopsychosocial (BPS) model, which some families interpret as a missed opportunity to enhance outcomes.
Auditory and urinary health are additional flashpoints. One reviewer notes that hearing aids can go missing for extended periods, sometimes with no clear resolution, underscoring a vulnerability in daily routines that matter greatly for communication. UTIs are highlighted as a recurring preventive and treatment concern. The reviewer argues that UTIs are often not tested or prevented as rigorously as required, linking this to broader antibiotic use in long-term care settings and describing preventable complications that can lead to more serious health events. The sentiment expressed is that the facility's response to these concerns is inconsistent, and that staff on the floor may react poorly when residents' families exercise their rights or press for better care.
The tone of several reviews shifts to call for strong, proactive advocacy. Reviewers share practical guidance about using regulatory frameworks and formal channels to improve care. They recommend forming a resident council, staying actively involved in care planning, and engaging the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program to assist when concerns remain unresolved. The emphasis is clear: knowledge of regulations governing licensure and operation, plus a willingness to advocate, can empower families to push for higher standards. A common refrain is that while the facility can deliver moments of genuine kindness and quality interaction, lasting improvements depend on vigilance and informed advocacy from families, along with the right support from oversight programs.
Perhaps the most sobering thread is a direct, autobiographical note about personal consequences of delayed or insufficient preventive care. One family recounts repeatedly pressing for UTI testing only to feel unheard, culminating in a week-long hospitalization for an untreated, preventable infection. The consequence described is severe: the loved one now requires a hoyer lift due to limited mobility, a situation the reviewer attributes to gaps in the prior care approach despite a robust body of research on prevention and management. The sentiment here is unmistakable: better communication, more consistent preventive practices, and a stronger commitment to evidence-based care could have altered this outcome. The reviewer ends with a pointed assertion about the financial scale of the parent company, suggesting that a facility earning substantial revenue should be able to deliver consistently higher quality care.
A final thread in these narratives is both practical and personal. Some reviewers single out specific staff experiences - such as a particularly unhappy front-desk interaction - as reflective of broader cultural or training issues within the facility. Taken together, the comments sketch a nuanced portrait: Summer Commons has clear strengths that families value deeply - cleanliness, engaging social programs, responsive, affectionate staff, and a welcoming atmosphere - but it also faces serious, implementational challenges that can compromise care when staffing is thin, training is inconsistent, and advocacy is not sustained. The overall message to prospective families is one of tempered expectation: the environment has much to offer, but the quality of care seems to hinge significantly on ongoing advocacy, vigilant oversight, and a commitment to aligning practice with current evidence.
In sum, these experiences present a facility that can meet important needs in meaningful, life-affirming ways, while also revealing persistent faults that can undermine care. The praise centered on warmth, cleanliness, activities, and community feel, while the criticisms focused on staffing, training, adherence to evidence-based care, preventive practices, and the necessity of persistent advocacy. For families weighing Summer Commons, the takeaway is to recognize both sides: the potential for nurturing, socially rich care exists, but it requires proactive involvement, informed questioning, and engagement with regulatory and advocacy resources to ensure that care aligns with the best available standards.
Summer Commons in Sanford, ME is a fully furnished assisted living community that offers a range of amenities and care services to provide residents with a comfortable and fulfilling lifestyle.
The community provides cable or satellite TV, Wi-Fi/high-speed internet, and telephone services so that residents can stay connected to the outside world. Each resident has access to a kitchenette where they can prepare their own meals if desired, but the community also offers meal preparation and service, including special dietary restrictions such as diabetes diets. Housekeeping services are provided to maintain a clean and organized living environment.
Residents can enjoy outdoor space in the form of gardens, where they can relax and soak up the fresh air. Move-in coordination is available to assist residents with the transition into their new home.
For those who require additional assistance, 24-hour supervision is provided along with activities of daily living assistance such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. Medication management ensures that residents take their medications as prescribed by their healthcare providers. Coordination with health care providers is also offered for seamless communication regarding residents' medical needs.
Mental wellness programs are available to support residents' emotional well-being. Transportation arrangements are made for medical appointments, ensuring that residents have access to necessary healthcare services.
Summer Commons encourages an active lifestyle through resident-run activities and scheduled daily activities. This promotes socialization and engagement within the community.
In terms of convenience, Summer Commons is located near various amenities including cafes, pharmacies, restaurants, places of worship, physicians' offices, and hospitals. This makes it easy for residents to access necessary goods and services without having to travel far from home.
Overall, Summer Commons provides a supportive and enriching environment for seniors who need assistance with daily activities while promoting independence and maintaining their overall well-being.
This part of Sanford, Maine offers a variety of amenities and services that cater to the needs of seniors looking for a peaceful and convenient living environment. With multiple physicians, including Goodall Health Family Practice and Pain Management, in close proximity, residents have easy access to medical care. The presence of Goodall Hospital ensures that emergency medical services are readily available. There are also several dining options nearby such as Mill Towne Tavern and Mee D Thai for those looking to enjoy a meal out. Additionally, pharmacies like Walgreens and CVS provide convenient access to medications. For spiritual needs, there are places of worship such as the Southern Baptist Convention within a short distance. With parks like Hollis Equestrian Park and Kennebunk Dog Park nearby, residents can also enjoy outdoor activities in the surrounding area. Overall, this part of Sanford offers a comfortable and well-rounded community for seniors to consider for their next chapter.
Summer Commons offers competitive pricing for its private room accommodations, with a monthly cost of $4,700. This rate positions it slightly lower than the average in York County, where similar private rooms are priced at approximately $4,726. When compared to the broader context of Maine, Summer Commons remains attractively priced against the statewide average of $4,625. Overall, Summer Commons provides an excellent option for those seeking comfortable living arrangements while balancing affordability in comparison to nearby counties and statewide trends.
Summer Commons is located at 21 June Street, Sanford, ME 04073 in York County, Maine
Summer Commons on seniors.fyi includes 7 photos including images showing building, architecture, parking, trees, exterior, accessibility, decor, landscaping, and more.
Jagger Apartments
Sanford, ME
Competitive pricing with nearby amenities.
Jagger Apartments costs
Jagger Apartments reviews
Jagger Apartments images
Sunrise of Huntington Common
Kennebunk, ME
Friendly, attentive staff; engaging activities; clean, welcoming environment with strong care options.
Sunrise of Huntington Common costs
Sunrise of Huntington Common reviews
Sunrise of Huntington Common images
Understanding the Nuances of Palliative Care and Hospice: A Comprehensive Exploration
Palliative care focuses on alleviating distress at any stage of a serious illness and can accompany curative treatments, while hospice care is for those nearing the end of life with a prognosis of six months or less, emphasizing comfort over curative measures. Both prioritize holistic care for patients and families but differ in timing, goals, and scope.
Fecal Incontinence in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Guide
Fecal incontinence, prevalent among older adults, arises from factors like weakened pelvic muscles and nerve damage, significantly affecting well-being and social interactions. Diagnosis involves clinical evaluation and tests to inform tailored treatments, while caregivers and preventive measures can aid in managing the condition effectively.
Nurturing Well-Being Through Gardening: A Detailed Guide for Senior Enthusiasts
Gardening provides seniors with physical exercise, mental and emotional support, and social interaction opportunities, while accommodating their needs through raised beds and ergonomic tools. It promotes health benefits like improved dexterity and cardiovascular health, encourages sustainable practices, and allows for manageable upkeep with low-maintenance plants.