2233 Eighth Street, Harvey, LA 70058
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Maison De'Ville Nursing Home Of Harvey Costs & Pricing
Maison De'Ville Nursing Home Of Harvey offers competitive pricing for its services, with the monthly cost for a private room set at $4,206. This rate is notably lower than both the average cost in Jefferson Parish, which stands at $4,675, and the statewide average in Louisiana of $4,521. By providing quality care at a more accessible price point compared to its local and state counterparts, Maison De'Ville positions itself as an attractive option for families seeking nursing home facilities that balance affordability with comprehensive care.
| Floor plans | Maison De'Ville Nursing Home Of Harvey | Jefferson Parish | Louisiana |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $4,206 | $4,675 | $4,521 |
Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$289 / mo
Chateau Living Center
$4,495 to $7,670 / month13.7 miles away
Overall Review of Maison De'Ville Nursing Home Of Harvey
Pros
Maison DeVille is a very clean facility.- The nurses and other caregivers are extremely friendly.
- They are very attentive to the needs of the residents and go out of their way for the residents.
- They do their best to make each resident feel special.
- During the holidays the home is decorated, groups visit the residents, and special meals are served.
- Residents receive clothing donated from the community, including expensive name-brand items.
Cons
They claim the facility should be shut down and deserves zero stars.- They describe extreme negligence, including leaving patients in bed all day and depriving them of water.
- They allege communication with loved ones was blocked during COVID.
- They report grave harm: severe bedsores and dehydration leading to hospitalization.
- They label the staff unprofessional and the administrator clueless.
- They call the place trash and criticize Medicaid being active there.
- They recount the missing cellphone and jewelry after their mother’s death, noting the response about replacement.
Review
Maison De'Ville Nursing Home of Harvey is best suited for families that can supervise care closely and want a clean, activity-rich environment at a modest price. It may work for residents whose needs are largely for daily living support and social engagement, provided relatives can monitor care and intervene quickly when issues arise. The facility can offer a tidy setting, predictable routines, and opportunities for interaction that help sustain morale. For families seeking assured medical oversight, rapid problem resolution, and consistently dignified treatment, however, the positives here are quickly overshadowed by grave concerns raised by multiple families. In short, this community may be workable only under vigilant, hands-on supervision, not as a turnkey solution for most vulnerable seniors.
Who should consider alternatives? Those with complex medical needs, rapid functional decline risk, or a necessity for unwavering medical governance should look elsewhere. Reports of neglect, dehydration, and worsening bedsores point to safety gaps that can trigger hospitalizations or worse outcomes. Families unable to visit regularly or to hold the administration accountable should not entrust a loved one here. Residents requiring careful medication management, dementia-specific protocols, or tightly regulated care plans may find the care misaligned with expectations. The strong caveat is clear: the facility’s attractive daily life features do not compensate for persistent safety and oversight deficits.
On the plus side, cleanliness and ambience stand out as genuine strengths. Several accounts praise a well-kept, orderly environment and a schedule that supports socialization and activity, which can meaningfully improve daily quality of life. Some staff members are described as friendly, attentive, and willing to accommodate individual preferences, including special meal needs. The holiday decor and community visits further reinforce a sense of normalcy. These elements can make a tangible difference in day-to-day satisfaction for residents who do not require intensive medical intervention. Yet, the existence of these positives does not inoculate the facility against fundamental safety concerns, and they do not erase the risk when medical oversight falters.
The principal concerns go deeper than surface impressions. Multiple families recount episodes of delayed assistance, inadequate hydration, and untreated bedsores that progressed to serious risk. One account describes a resident whose care deteriorated under sedation practices and insufficient physician oversight, followed by a challenging transition back to hospital care. Personal belongings have disappeared or been mislaid, and communications with families can be inconsistent. Administrative leadership faces criticism for unclear direction and insufficient responsiveness to problems. Taken together, these patterns signal a systemic risk: even a clean facility with courteous staff cannot compensate for chronic lapses in safety, timely care, and medical governance. For families, this translates into a high-stakes decision with potential for harm.
Practical decision steps are essential. Schedule focused visits and observe care during peak activity periods and when assistance is required. Request copies of recent incident reports, current staff rosters, and the administrator’s remediation plan. Check state health inspection records and speak with current residents and their families about consistency of care. If staying, insist on a formal oversight agreement, defined response times, and clear escalation paths. When evaluating alternatives, compare facilities with stronger safety records, transparent governance, and robust medical oversight. If budget constraints are a priority, prioritize proven safety and governance over pro forma cleanliness or activity programs. The optimal choice will align livability with reliable, accountable care.
Bottom line: this community warrants cautious consideration and explicit oversight. It may be workable for highly supervised cases and cost-conscious families who can actively monitor care and demand accountability, but for anyone needing dependable medical management and consistent, compassionate care, alternatives deserve priority. The safety concerns documented by multiple families cannot be dismissed, and the presence of a few positive caregiving experiences does not negate the risk. Families should move toward options with proven safety records, transparent governance, and a plan to prevent neglect before it becomes a crisis. In sensitive decisions of this magnitude, safer, steadier care is non-negotiable.
100 resident community capacity
Skilled Nursing Facility
Air-conditioning
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private bathrooms
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
New Orleans International (13 miles away)
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Concierge services
Planned day trips
A Comprehensive Exploration of Common Misunderstandings about Powers of Attorney
Senior Move Management: Understanding the Role, Value, and Associated Costs
Weight Training for Seniors: Building Strength and Vitality