1301 Harrison Street, Bogalusa, LA 70427
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Resthaven Living Center
Pros
The staff are like family and they love their residents.
The care is excellent, with staffâfrom janitors to the head administratorâbeing excellent.
The physical therapist was great in assisting residents.
The morale of residents and staff remains high despite budget constraints.
Families witnessed the kindness, caring, and patience provided to their loved ones.
Resthaven takes good care of residents, and families report satisfaction.
Brookside Rehab is a facility that families would recommend to others seeking care.
Cons
The facility is not recommended for long-term care.
The service and care are not consistent.
The reviewer warns that relatives must constantly check on their loved one in person if trusting the facility.
The reviewer states that the mother died at the hands of the facility's workers.
The place is absolutely vile; everything is dirty, with moldy water machines.
A shower tech pushed a resident down into her wheelchair and bruised her shoulders.
The food served was not suitable for dogs and lacked a nutritionally balanced diet.
Soiled diapers and wipes are left on the floor and in soiled pants.
The reviewer warns not to leave loved ones there.
Most of the staff are uncaring and slow to respond; professionalism is repugnant.
Review
Resthaven Living Center in Bogalusa is best suited for families who plan to stay actively involved and are weighing respite care or short rehabilitative stays rather than a long-term residence. The facility can deliver attentive, compassionate care when staff are present and engaged, but experiences vary widely. For families able to commit to frequent visits, ongoing supervision, and meticulous care checks, Resthaven can meet basic needs at a lower cost than some peers. For everyone else, the consensus in the reviews is a cautious approach: long-term placement carries notable risk, demanding constant vigilance. In short, this community can work as a caregiver-led patch, not as a reliable, hands-off solution for extended care.
Explicitly, those who should consider alternatives include anyone requiring consistent, medically supervised long-term care, reliable cleanliness, and proactive safety measures. A pattern of neglect, slow response, and unsafe conditions emerges in several accounts, and remote families may struggle to verify care without frequent, in-person oversight. If the ability to visit regularly is limited, Resthaven becomes a risky proposition rather than a stabilizing home. Competing options cited by families, Forest Manor, Heritage, Good Samaritan, are presented as benchmarks for steadier staffing, more predictable outcomes, and better day-to-day reliability. For residents who need unwavering safety and continuity, diverting to those alternatives is prudent.
On the upside, when the staff are aligned, real advantages appear. Multiple reviews emphasize staff warmth and a sense of family among residents, and Brookside Rehabâs physical therapy program earns praise for helping some residents regain mobility. The morale of residents and staff, sustained despite tight budgets and stringent regulatory demands, signals a work culture that cares and tries hard. These strengths can translate into better daily experiences for some residents and provide a foundation for meaningful engagement. Yet these positives are fragile and do not erase the core concerns about consistency and safety that recur in many accounts.
The weight of the cons is hard to ignore. Reports describe dirty conditions, moldy water machines, and unsanitary environments, alongside episodes of inadequate assistance and even physical harm. Several families recount missed doctor visits, delayed diagnoses, and limited medical oversight, culminating in life-threatening situations that required emergency intervention. Communication is inconsistent, with some lines going unanswered for extended periods, leaving relatives isolated and uncertain about a loved oneâs status. Taken together, these patterns point to a facility where good moments exist but are easily overshadowed by episodic neglect, slow responsiveness, and safety lapses that cannot be dismissed as rare incidents.
Decision-making should center on certainty and transparency. Prospective residents must demand current, detailed care plans, direct access to the administrator and nurse manager, and clear staffing ratios for each shift. A thorough, multi-time-of-day inspection of the environment is essential to verify cleaning, sanitation, and laundry procedures. Enquire into emergency protocols, response times for calls, and management of medical needs such as infections, wounds, or IV therapy. If answers feel hedged or inconsistent, the prudent move is to pursue alternatives with urgency rather than tests of patience.
Bottom line: Resthaven Living Center can be workable for families who stay engaged, are budget-conscious, and are prepared to actively supervise daily care. For those requiring reliable long-term safety, consistent clinical oversight, and pristine living conditions, stronger options exist. The ultimate choice hinges on the ability to monitor care continually and tolerate uneven performance. If Resthaven is chosen, enter with a concrete plan: scheduled visits, explicit care goals, and a demand for measurable improvements, while exploring higherâreliability facilities in parallel. This approach protects loved ones from the facilityâs most serious vulnerabilities while still leveraging whatever dependable care it may offer on good days.












Comprehensive Insights and Practical Strategies to Help Older Adults Avoid Falls
6 Crucial Ways an Elder Law Attorney Assists Families
Navigating the Tax Landscape of Caregiving: Credits, Deductions, and Beyond


