213 Halland Avenue, Po Box 430, Stanton, IA 51573
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Accura Healthcare Of Stanton Costs & Pricing
Accura Healthcare of Stanton offers competitive pricing for its services, aligning closely with the costs observed in Montgomery County and throughout Iowa. The facility charges $3,700 per month for a semi-private room, matching the local county rate but notably lower than the state average of $3,885. For those seeking greater privacy, the private room option is priced at $4,440, which also corresponds to the county's fee and remains below Iowa's average of $4,670. Interestingly, their studio rooms are listed at $4,810 - a price point that exceeds both the county and statewide averages, with Iowa's typical studio cost being significantly lower at $3,613. Overall, Accura Healthcare of Stanton presents a balanced approach to pricing that reflects their commitment to providing quality care while remaining mindful of regional market trends.
| Floor plans | Accura Healthcare Of Stanton | Montgomery County | Iowa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,700 | $3,700 | $3,885 |
| Private | $4,440 | $4,440 | $4,670 |
| Studio | $4,810 | $4,810 | $3,609 |
Overall Review of Accura Healthcare Of Stanton
Pros
They are determined to advocate for accountability and improvements in elder-care facilities.
They believe that proper pain management and compassionate care must be prioritized for every resident.
They value documenting experiences and sharing information to protect others.
They hope their efforts will raise awareness and prevent future residents from suffering neglect.
They remain hopeful that systemic changes and stronger oversight will enhance patient safety.
Cons
The facility is described as horrible and abusive toward residents, with claims of neglect.
It is alleged that pain medication was not given as scheduled, causing the mother's suffering and death.
An aide who abused the mother was allowed to continue working there.
There are photographs showing bruises and bed sores on the mother, with witnesses to mistreatment.
The facility allegedly lied about having a pain management protocol in place and denied its existence.
The care for the mother-in-law allegedly caused severe suffering, including breathing difficulties, leading to her death and PTSD in a family member.
Residents were afraid because doors were shut at night, preventing them from calling for help.
Basic care tasks, such as dressing bed sores and brushing dentures, were neglected for extended periods.
Review
This community is best suited for families that are confronted with limited local options and must operate within a tight budget, while simultaneously committing to rigorous, ongoing oversight of care. In practice, that combination is rare to justify given the reports that have surfaced. The captured experiences describe serious safety and care failures, making it clear that this facility can require constant monitoring and assertive advocacy from family members to prevent harm.
Those evaluating options should understand who may want to look elsewhere. Multiple families allege neglect and dangerous lapses in basic care, including delayed or withheld pain meds, deteriorating wounds, and fear-inducing staffing behavior. A pattern emerges of insufficient medication management, inadequate response to distress, and a lack of timely assistance during shifts. The strongest warnings come from state-level concerns about care quality, and from accounts of an aide accused of abuse and the facility’s response to reporting. Given these concerns, alternatives with transparent safety records, reliable pain control, and proven wound care are worth priority.
In weighing any potential positives against these serious drawbacks, the positives do not meaningfully offset the core risks. While two reviews grant high marks, the overwhelming majority of accounts describe repeated, consequential harm, pain and breath support compromised by medication delays, bedsores and bruising, and pervasive fear of nighttime confinement. The absence of consistent, verifiable evidence that pain management and medical needs are reliably addressed undermines any presumed benefits from ratings elsewhere. When safety and dignity are at stake, a few favorable anecdotes cannot erase the risk.
The real-world implication is clear: even plausible staff attentiveness or a responsive administrator does not erase documented failures to provide timely medication, proper wound care, or respectful, humane treatment. Families should not assume a “best effort” approach without firsthand confirmation of daily routines, medication administration times, and clear escalation protocols. Without transparent performance data and consistent improvement, the reported negatives remain systemic concerns rather than anomalies. In other words, the pros, where they exist, fail to counteract the depth and repetition of the cons.
For families actively comparing options, concrete steps matter. Review state inspection findings and complaint histories, request the most recent care plans and medication administration records, and observe a full day of routine, including med passes, meals, and wound care if applicable. Speak directly with front-line staff and the nurse in charge, and ask to see the facility’s escalation pathway for pain management and urgent needs. If choosing this community, insist on a formal, binding care agreement with daily family updates, 24/7 on-call access, and guaranteed response times. Consider a back-up plan that involves hospitalization or transfer if signals of neglect or insufficient pain control reappear.
Ultimately, the balance of evidence strongly favors pursuing alternatives in most cases. Accura Healthcare Of Stanton presents substantial safety concerns that compromise core expectations for elder care, reliable medication management, prompt attention to distress, and dignified daily living. If a decision rests with this location, it requires aggressive oversight, an ironclad care plan, and ongoing vigilance. For families with viable options offering demonstrated safety records, those paths are preferable; only pursue this facility if there is a concrete plan to secure constant oversight, measurable improvements, and an unambiguous commitment to patient rights and safety.









Supportive Employee Benefits That Help Caregivers Attain Better Work-Life Harmony
Top Cars for Senior Drivers and Essential Safety Innovations
A Closer Look at Private Pay Home Care