Sharon Health Care Elms

Pros

• The facility has made incredible improvements in the last six months.
• The new nursing staff contributes positively to the care provided.
• The quality of food in the kitchen has significantly improved.
• The author feels they received excellent help at this facility.
• Staff members are praised for their great work and dedication.

Cons

• The facility has a history of neglect, as indicated by past incidents involving choking hazards that were ignored.
• Despite recent improvements, concerns remain about the safety and care provided to residents.
• There have been serious incidents in the past, such as a resident choking on food due to inadequate precautions.
• The nursing home was fined for neglect, raising doubts about its current level of care.
• Families may feel uneasy leaving their loved ones in a facility with a troubling past related to resident safety.

Review

In a comparison of two vastly different experiences at a nursing facility, the reviews reflect a spectrum of sentiments, showcasing both commendable improvements and deeply concerning past incidents. One reviewer enthusiastically highlights recent enhancements made to the nursing home over the past six months. This individual expresses astonishment at how much progress has been achieved, particularly in terms of patient care and culinary offerings. They note that new nursing staff have joined the facility, indicating a refreshing change that seems to have positively impacted the overall environment. With renewed confidence, they brought their loved one back to this facility and were eager to share their positive observations with others.

The reviewer emphasizes that the quality of food served has drastically improved—claiming it is now "100% better." This transformation appears to play an essential role in enhancing residents' overall experience during their stay. The reviewer acknowledges that they received invaluable assistance from the staff during this transition, expressing gratitude for all the help provided. Their message serves as a beacon of hope for families seeking reliable care options, urging them to consider this facility based on its newfound dedication and performance.

Conversely, another review starkly contrasts with this optimistic perspective by recounting a tragic personal experience tied to inadequate care within the same establishment. This individual's father passed away choking on a peanut butter sandwich in 2014—a devastating event they assert could have been avoided had proper precautions been followed regarding his known choking hazard listed in his medical chart. The severity of neglect was grave enough that it resulted in a $50,000 fine imposed on the nursing home following this incident. Such a harrowing account raises critical questions about safety protocols and staff training at these facilities.

This review serves as an alarming reminder for families considering placing their loved ones in similar environments—underscoring that neglect can lead to grave consequences. The emotional weight carried by those left behind after experiencing such tragedy cannot be understated; frustration toward how systemic failures allowed such occurrences is palpable. It further highlights discrepancies between what may appear as operational improvement versus ingrained issues within organization practices and culture.

For families contemplating assisted living or skilled nursing care for their relatives, these reviews project an essential dichotomy: while some experiences illustrate marked improvements indicative of positive change, others reveal shadows from potentially disastrous oversight issues rooted deep within management or staffing methods. Clarity must be sought when evaluating facilities—not only relying on surface-level advancements but also thoroughly investigating historical performance records and ensuring adequate safeguards are implemented for vulnerable seniors.

Ultimately, both reviews serve critical roles in informing potential patients’ families about making educated decisions regarding long-term care facilities. It’s vital for readers to weigh both perspectives—the optimism rooted in recent changes against painful recollections of negligence—to take holistic view into account before placing trust in any particular institution's capacity to provide safe and compassionate care for their loved ones.

Places of Worship

• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (0.4 miles)
• Redeemer Presbyterian Church (1.5 miles)
• Church Of The Brethren-Peoria (2.4 miles)

Restaurants

• Taco Bell (0.7 miles)
• Hungry Moose (0.9 miles)
• Sonic Drive-In (0.9 miles)
• Kouri's Pub (0.9 miles)
• Chipotle Mexican Grill (1.1 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (1.1 miles)
• Red Lobster (1.1 miles)

Cafes

• Panera Bread (0.8 miles)
• Starbucks (1.2 miles)
• Starbucks (2 miles)
• One World Eats & Drinks (2.7 miles)
• Starbucks (3.1 miles)
• Thirty Thirty Coffee Co. (3.6 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.2 miles)
• Schnucks (2 miles)
• Walgreens (2.4 miles)
• Medicine Stop (2.8 miles)
• Walgreens (2.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.8 miles)
• Alwan Pharmacy and Compounding Center (3 miles)

Physicians

• Kurth Shanna PhD (1.5 miles)
• Soderstrom Skin Institute (1.7 miles)
• Soderstrom (1.7 miles)
• Soderstrom Dermatology Center (1.7 miles)
• Peoria Ambulatory Surgery Center (1.7 miles)
• OSFMG - Glen Park Family Medicine (1.9 miles)
• Bard Optical - Peoria Metro Centre (2 miles)

Hospitals

• Proctor Hospital (2.9 miles)
• UnityPoint Health - Proctor (3 miles)
• Methodist Medical Center of Illinois (3.4 miles)
• OSF Milestone Building (3.4 miles)
• Osf Forest Park (3.5 miles)
• OSF Healthcare System (3.5 miles)
• University of Il Department of Pediatrics (3.5 miles)

Theaters

• GQT Willow Knolls 14 (2.9 miles)