The Care Center Of Honolulu

Pros

• The reviewer is concerned about the well-being of others and wants to protect future clients from negative experiences.
• The reviewer acknowledges their sister's cooking skills, highlighting her knowledge of food quality and preparation.
• The reviewer demonstrates a strong sense of responsibility by advocating for better treatment in care facilities.
• The reviewer is observant and aware of the issues faced by residents, indicating a desire for improvements in care standards.

Cons

• The facility is understaffed and unresponsive, leading to poor care for patients.
• Daily therapy was promised but only provided once or twice a week, indicating a lack of commitment to patient needs.
• The staff showed disrespect by shooing a patient away and reacting angrily when the call button was used.
• Food served to residents was of low quality, overly salty, and not suitable for diabetics, reflecting inadequate dietary standards.
• Recycling food items raised concerns about hygiene and proper food handling practices in the facility.
• Overall, the Care Center of Honolulu failed to provide appropriate care and support for residents, demonstrating negligence in their responsibilities.

Review

The experiences shared by the reviewers highlight significant concerns regarding the quality of care and overall environment at the Care Center of Honolulu. The overwhelming sentiment expressed is one of distrust towards the facility, primarily due to understaffing issues and inadequate responsiveness from staff when patients require assistance. One reviewer notes that using the call button for help often results in unresponsiveness, leading to feelings of abandonment and frustration. This lack of attention not only undermines the sense of security that individuals in a care facility should feel but also raises alarms about patient safety and well-being.

A critical point raised involves the scheduling and frequency of therapy sessions promised to residents. According to one account, daily therapy was expected, yet only occurred once or twice a week throughout several weeks. Such a discrepancy between what is promised and what is delivered can have profound implications on a patient's recovery or maintenance of their condition. It speaks volumes about potential deficits in communication within the staff as well as an apparent disregard for individual patient needs, which every care facility should prioritize.

Furthermore, disturbing allegations regarding staff conduct were made by one reviewer who described an incident involving a male orderly who exhibited inappropriate behavior after being asked for assistance. This incident reflects not just poor treatment but also raises concerns about staff training and professionalism within the facility. Throwing the call button at a resident signifies an alarming lack of empathy and respect for those who are vulnerable—a clear violation of ethical standards expected in healthcare settings.

The quality of food served at the Care Center also came under scrutiny. Reviewers indicated that meals provided to residents were overly salty and not tailored to meet dietary restrictions common among seniors, such as diabetes management. Additionally, there were claims that food was being recycled improperly—where remnants from previous meals could be found in new servings—further compounding worries about hygiene standards and overall nutrition quality in care facilities renowned for catering to specific dietary needs.

Apart from food quality issues, other general conditions within the building itself drew negative comments from reviewers, which adds another layer of concern regarding resident comfort and safety within such an important space meant for healing and care. When combined with reports of understaffing, subpar meal preparation, inadequate personal attention during vital moments, and disrespectful staff interactions, these elements portray a troubling picture of neglect.

Finally, it is evident that both reviewers are motivated by a genuine desire to protect future clients from experiencing similar hardships faced by their loved ones while under care at this facility. Their accounts underline deeper systemic issues that need addressing—not merely for compliance sake but more importantly for ensuring dignity, respect, and comprehensive care are afforded to all residents moving forward. Sharing these experiences serves as crucial feedback not only aimed at improving service delivery at the Care Center but also advocating accountability across similar institutions caring for vulnerable communities.

Hospitals

• Kuakini Medical Center (0.1 miles)
• Hmce (0.6 miles)
• The Queen's Medical Center (1 miles)
• Queen's Medical Center (1.1 miles)
• Honolulu Clinic (1.6 miles)
• Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children (2.1 miles)

Physicians

• Dr Eugene Lee , MD (0.1 miles)
• Cataract & Vision Center of Hawaii (0.2 miles)
• Honolulu Diagnostic Imaging (0.2 miles)
• Dr Christina Spiers (0.4 miles)
• June Uyehara-Isono (0.5 miles)
• Dr Jason Lam's Office (0.5 miles)
• Maluhia Health Center (0.6 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.3 miles)
• Zippy's Vineyard (0.6 miles)
• Sakana Grill (1.1 miles)
• Liliha Bakery (1.1 miles)
• McDonald's (1.2 miles)
• Aloha Beer Company (1.5 miles)
• McDonald's (1.5 miles)

Pharmacies

• Times Pharmacy - Liliha (0.4 miles)
• Walgreens (0.4 miles)
• Longs Drugs (0.7 miles)
• Longs Drugs (1 miles)
• Queen's POB I Pharmacy (1 miles)
• Walgreens (1.1 miles)
• Longs Drugs (1.2 miles)

Places of Worship

• Izumo Taishakyo Mission of Hawaii (0.6 miles)
• Sacred Heart Church (2.1 miles)

Theaters

• Regal Dole Cannery ScreenX, 4DX, IMAX & RPX (1.1 miles)

Cafes

• The Bishop Museum Café by Highway Inn (1.2 miles)
• Mariposa at Neiman Marcus (2.4 miles)
• Honolulu Coffee Experience Center (2.6 miles)

Parks

• Makiki District Park (1.8 miles)
• Tantalus Lookout (2.4 miles)
• Magic Island (2.7 miles)