Pruitthealth - Eastside

Pros

• The staff seemed nice and were polite when interacting with the reviewer.
• The room itself was fine and met basic expectations.
• The reviewer took proactive steps to ensure their husband's safety by requesting bed rails.

Cons

• The facility did not have safety rails on the bed, putting the husband at risk of falling.
• There was inadequate monitoring of residents, as he was placed too far away for staff to check on him effectively.
• The staff appeared agreeable but were quick to deny any issues when problems arose.
• Two falls occurred due to the lack of proper supervision and equipment in place.
• The overall concern for resident safety was insufficient, leading to significant worry for the family.

Review

The reviewer shares a concerning experience regarding their husband’s stay at Rosewood, a facility that appears to have fallen short in terms of ensuring safety and proper monitoring for its residents. The careful attention given by the reviewer highlights various aspects of care that can be pivotal in a residential setting, particularly when dealing with vulnerable individuals.

According to the reviewer, they initially placed their husband in Rosewood around 5:00 PM and remained with him until 9:00 PM. During this time, they seem to have sensed an alarmingly inadequate level of supervision and support. Later that evening, the reviewer received distressing news prompting them to return to the facility; it was reported that their husband had fallen out of bed. Such incidents raise significant concerns about patient safety protocols and necessary precautions within care facilities.

Upon arriving back at Rosewood, the reviewer discovered that their husband had not only fallen once but had struggled multiple times, which points to alarming lapses in care and oversight during his stay. This situation highlighted the absence of critical safety measures—specifically bed rails—which could have mitigated the risk of falls. It is evident from the reviewer's perspective that such preventive measures are essential in safeguarding residents who may have mobility issues or require additional support.

Moreover, the reviewer expressed frustration over what they perceived as insufficient monitoring within the room where their husband was staying. The fact that he was positioned too far away from staff members who could promptly attend to him serves as an indication of poor planning regarding resident placement and care strategies. This lack of proactive management raises serious questions about patient welfare and how well staff understands individual needs.

While commenting on the staff's demeanor, the reviewer noted that although they were generally pleasant during interactions, there seemed to be a predisposition among them towards denial when problems arose. This aspect contributes to an unsettling atmosphere for family members concerned about loved ones' safety and wellbeing in a facility meant for care. It further complicates trust between caregivers and relatives, especially when incidents like falls occur without adequate explanations or accountability from staff.

Ultimately, due to these compounded issues surrounding safety equipment and monitoring protocols—or rather the lack thereof—the reviewer made the decision to remove their husband from Rosewood altogether after his initial night there. Their experience underscores a broader discussion regarding standards in assisted living or nursing facilities: how essential it is for such environments to prioritize both physical safety measures and robust monitoring systems designed specifically for those who may be unable to advocate for themselves.

In conclusion, while Rosewood may possess some favorable qualities—such as polite staff interaction—the overarching narrative depicted through this review reflects serious shortcomings related to patient safety protocols and practical caregiving solutions. Families placing loved ones into care facilities must feel assured that comprehensive systems are firmly implemented for protection against potential hazards like falls—an assurance sadly lacking according to this account—and strive toward creating more supportive environments requiring vigilance from both caregivers and administrative personnel alike.

Pharmacies

• Express Rx Pharmacy (1.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2 miles)
• Scott's Health Mart Pharmacy (2.4 miles)
• Anco A Division of Chem-Aqua (4.3 miles)
• Walgreens (6.3 miles)

Restaurants

• Old Times Country Buffet (1.9 miles)
• Burger King (2.2 miles)
• Vintage Restaurant - Marriott Macon (2.5 miles)
• Nu-Way Weiners (2.7 miles)
• El Sombrero Mexican Grill & Bar (2.7 miles)
• American Feel & Wings (3.1 miles)
• Waffle House (3.1 miles)

Parks

• East Macon Park (1.9 miles)
• G. Bernd Park (3.4 miles)
• Macon Dog Park (4.1 miles)

Places of Worship

• Real Life Church (2.2 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (2.2 miles)
• Immanuel Baptist Church (2.2 miles)
• Swift Creek Baptist Church (3.1 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (3.8 miles)
• St Peter Claver Catholic Church (4.2 miles)
• St James Ame Church (4.5 miles)

Physicians

• Coppage A Taylor III MD (2.4 miles)
• Coliseum Heart, Lung And Vascular (2.4 miles)
• Obgyn Specialists (2.4 miles)
• Georgia Cancer Specialists (2.4 miles)
• Skin Care Physicians of Georgia (2.4 miles)
• Dermatologic Surgery Specialists (2.4 miles)
• Internal Medicine Associates (2.5 miles)

Hospitals

• Coliseum Medical Center Radiology/X-Ray (2.4 miles)
• Coliseum Diagnostic Center (2.4 miles)
• Albert Luce Heart Tower (3.6 miles)
• PICU- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (3.7 miles)
• North Macon Healthcare (6.3 miles)

Transportation

• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (2.4 miles)
• Macon Station (3.1 miles)

Cafes

• Chevys Cafe (2.5 miles)