13542 Second Street, Yucaipa, CA 92399
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Calimesa Post Acute
Pros
The facility is described as very kind and comforting, with residents being well cared for.
The staff are great, very friendly, and take excellent care of residents.
Calimesa Post Acute has phenomenal, caring staff who are professional and attentive.
The CNAs are very helpful and nice.
The nursing staff are advocates for residents and their families.
The facility is safe and clean and recommended to others.
The rehab department staff are dedicated to helping residents return to daily living.
The director is accessible and hands-on with patient care.
Cons
It was the worst home to place a family in.
A dead man's phone was stolen after only two weeks there.
They neglected to answer call lights.
The facility had peeling paint and was run by people youâd see at a nightclub.
It was the most unprofessional establishment.
One should not send loved ones to this place.
There were rats in the kitchen during the state review.
Belongings were stolen and staff did not investigate who stole them.
A roommate attacked him, knocking him out of his wheelchair.
He was told to return to the hospital, but he wasnât healthy enough to leave and medication was not provided.
The staff were uncooperative and argumentative, preferring excuses over action.
A nurse used a wooden stick to clear a blockage in a feeding tube, leading to hospitalization within 24 hours.
Review
Calimesa Post Acute in Yucaipa is best suited for families that value a personal, caregiver-facing approach and a rehab team that can show tangible progress with the right oversight. It is not ideal for seniors who require consistently high-level medical management, strict safety standards, or uniformly reliable operations. Families should be prepared to supervise care closely and demand clear accountability, because the strongest advantages here hinge on the quality of frontline staff and the dedicated rehab professionals, not on a uniformly dependable system of care.
Several reviews flag real strengths in the caregiving culture. When the facility is functioning at its best, the nursing and rehab teams are described as kind, comforting, and highly engaged. Patientsâ families repeatedly praise the skilled staff who advocate for loved ones, the accessible administrators, and the cohesive rehab department that pushes for recovery and daily functioning. Dietary staff often negotiates individual preferences, and several accounts highlight administrators and case managers who stay involved in care planning. In short, the humans on the ground can be excellent and can drive meaningful improvement for residents who benefit from hands-on, attentive care.
But the positives sit alongside a troubling set of persistent problems that undermine reliability and safety. Repeated reports describe call lights ignored, medications mismanaged or delayed, and critical communications failures that leave families in the dark about a loved oneâs status. The facility is also described as understaffed at times, with consequences that include hospital transfers or extended gaps in treatment. Beyond clinical missteps, several reviews recount personal losses of belongings, including phones and clothing, and even dangerous roommate conflicts. There are alarming mentions of a dirty environment and a state finding related to rodents, which together raise serious concerns about infection control and general safety.
The core tension is that the laudable care ethic and strong rehab focus do not consistently translate into dependable operations. The best-case picture features compassionate nurses who advocate for residents and a rehab program that helps people regain daily living skills. The worst-case picture, frequent missed treatments, unreturned calls, and safety lapses, dominates the decision for most families. When weighed, the consistent absence of reliability in critical areas (medication administration, urgent communication, and patient safety) tends to eclipse the meaningful moments of high-quality care. The resulting impression is a facility that can deliver excellent moments, but often fails to hold a safe, predictable standard over time.
Families who should consider alternatives are those for whom reliable medical oversight and total safety are non-negotiable. If a loved one requires meticulous diabetes or IV antibiotic management, constant supervision of call bells, or a consistently clean and secure environment, other post-acute options will likely outperform Calimesa Post Acute. For dementia care where wandering risks or aggression may arise, or for households unable to monitor care around the clock, the risk profile here is too high. Even moderate concerns, like the possibility of belongings going missing or delayed responses to asks for help, should prompt a comparison with facilities known for stronger staffing patterns and stricter operational controls.
For decision-making, approach Calimesa Post Acute with a plan that emphasizes accountability and transparency. Request exact nurse-to-patient and aide-to-patient ratios, define a guaranteed response time for call lights, and insist on daily updates from the DON or administrator. Obtain a clear policy on safeguarding personal belongings and a detailed incident-report process. Review recent state or licensing inspections and ask to see implemented corrective actions, particularly around cleanliness and food-preparation areas. If choosing to proceed, set a defined trial period with formal milestones, and ensure a clinician or advocate remains engaged in monitoring care. The facility is not universally doomed, but it is not a safe default choice without rigorous oversight and explicit guarantees.









Supportive Employee Benefits That Help Caregivers Attain Better Work-Life Harmony
Top Cars for Senior Drivers and Essential Safety Innovations
A Closer Look at Private Pay Home Care