Assumption Nursing Care

Pros

• The instructors are amazing and the school is great.
• The LVN program is great because it screens students well.
• The program helps graduates secure a job after graduation.

Cons

• They claim the school robbed them of their money and call it a scam.
• The facility is dirty and unprofessional.
• Communication among staff is poor; no updates are provided, and they are told to call back or that someone will call.
• They were charged an extra $500 on top of the $1,700 already paid.
• CNA CEUs prices were doubled.
• The school takes money but does not issue certificates; CEU certificates are not emailed within 7?10 days, and the student has to chase them.
• They allege discrimination: non-Filipino individuals are not helped.

Review

Across several accounts from students who pursued health-education programs at this location, the experiences run a broad gamut. Some describe a program that promises flexibility for working adults, while others recount a cascade of financial and logistical issues that undermined trust and left them scrambling to find alternative training pathways. The common threads, however, are inconsistent communication, unclear or shifting pricing, and a facility experience that many found unprofessional or unsanitary. Taken together, the narratives paint a picture of a place where outcomes appear to depend as much on who you are as on what you sign up for.

One of the most troubling stories centers on payment and scheduling promises. A prospective student says the program advertised an accommodating schedule that would work around their full-time job. They paid the entire course in cash, about $1,700, with the understanding they could complete the training on a flexible timetable. When they had to be absent four times due to work obligations and later because they contracted COVID, they expected some accommodation or at least a fair process for catching up. Instead, they allege the school retroactively penalized them: they were told to pay an additional $500 on top of what they had already paid. They ultimately completed their certification elsewhere and chose not to return, feeling they had been taken advantage of financially. The grievance centers on the sense that absence was penalized rather than supported, and that the institution leveraged the situation to demand more money rather than facilitating remediation.

Other accounts amplify concerns about transparency and organization. Several reviewers describe a facility that felt dirty or unprofessional, paired with a systemic inability of staff to communicate effectively. They recount long delays, vague promises to "call back later" or "someone will call you," and a persistent lack of clarity about where their enrollment, progress, or certificates stood. The repeated refrain is that staff members cannot provide timely updates or keep reliable track of students' progress. In practice, this translates into a frustrating loop where students spend more time chasing information than engaging with the coursework, which naturally erodes confidence in the program's reliability.

Pricing practices appear to be a recurrent source of discontent as well. In at least one reaction, the same location reportedly doubled the prices for CNA continuing education units (CEUs), forcing students to face a higher cost for the same or a portion of the same services they had expected to receive. The sudden price increase left some students feeling blindsided, especially if the new rate did not come with a commensurate improvement in service or assurances about timeliness and certification. This kind of price volatility, when paired with inconsistent communication and unclear deadlines, compounds the sense that the institution is not fully aligned with students' practical needs.

Despite the negative reports, there are complimentary voices that highlight different aspects of the institution. A few reviewers praise the instructors themselves, with phrases like "Amazing instructors" and "great for LVN programs." They credit the school with screening students effectively and claim that graduates receive tangible help in securing employment after completion. These remarks imply that, on a separate track, the educational quality and job-placement assistance can be strong - enough to warrant engagement for some learners who prioritize instruction quality and career support over administrative processes.

But even positive notes are sometimes tempered by cautionary details. Another reviewer who tried to pursue CEUs for CNA licensing reported a mismatch between promises and outcomes: after eight classes, they were told certificates would be emailed within seven to ten days, yet weeks passed without receipt. The frustration is palpable - being told to expect contact or delivery that never arrives, followed by repeated assurances that someone would get back to them, only to experience radio silence. The overall message is clear: when certificates or licenses are at stake, delays and poor follow-through become a major red flag, undermining the perceived value of the program.

A particularly troubling line from one account hints at broader equity concerns. The reviewer claimed that support was not available to everyone and that language or ethnicity may factor into how services are delivered, explicitly stating, "Unless you are Filipino they won't help you." If accurate, such a sentiment points to a troubling lack of inclusive practice and raises questions about the consistency and fairness of the student experience. It's a claim that would warrant careful investigation by the institution and by prospective students evaluating whether to enroll.

Taken together, the compiled experiences sketch a clinic of contrasts: some students note fertile ground for learning and career outcomes, while others describe a program beset by misaligned incentives, opaque policies, and operational shortcomings. The recurring themes - financial disputes and additional charges after initial payments, inconsistent or non-existent updates on progress or certificates, and a perception of dirty facilities or unprofessional conduct - shape a cautious takeaway for anyone considering enrollment. The stories underscore the importance of transparent pricing, reliable administrative processes, and timely fulfillment of credentialing promises.

For prospective students weighing this option, the central guidance derived from these accounts is to conduct thorough diligence before committing. Ask for a clear, written fee schedule, including any penalties for absences and exact conditions under which price changes can occur. Request a detailed timeline for completing the course, including how make-up sessions are handled, how attendance will be tracked, and what your rights are if you must miss days due to work or illness. Verify the communication standards: who will be your point of contact, how often you should expect updates, and how they will be delivered. And crucially, confirm the institution's track record for issuing certificates or CEUs, with explicit timelines and guarantees in writing.

In short, the range of experiences at this location illustrates why prospective students should proceed with caution. While some instructors and content may be strong, the overall reliability of administrative processes, transparency around costs, and timeliness of credential fulfillment appear to be inconsistent enough to merit serious scrutiny. If you decide to enroll, go in well-prepared with questions, demand concrete timelines, and consider comparing with other programs to ensure you receive the value, support, and credentials you expect for your investment.

This part of Glendale, California offers a variety of amenities and conveniences that may be appealing for senior living. With several hospitals in close proximity, including Glendale Adventist Medical Center and Providence St Joseph Medical Center, residents have access to quality healthcare services. Additionally, there are numerous dining options such as Din Tai Fung and Porto's Bakery & Cafe, as well as pharmacies like CVS and Walgreens for easy access to medications. For entertainment, seniors can enjoy nearby theaters like AMC The Americana at Brand 18 and Universal Cinema AMC at CityWalk Hollywood. Parks like Elysian Park and Hahamongna Watershed Park provide opportunities for outdoor recreation. With transportation options available from Union Station just 6.1 miles away, this neighborhood offers convenience and accessibility for seniors looking to reside in Glendale.

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.3 miles)
• Din Tai Fung (0.8 miles)
• In-N-Out Burger (0.8 miles)
• Porto's Bakery & Cafe (0.9 miles)
• In-N-Out Burger (0.9 miles)
• McDonald's (3.1 miles)
• Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (4.1 miles)

Hospitals

• Medical 2 unit (0.8 miles)
• Glendale Adventist Medical Center (0.8 miles)
• Providence St Joseph Medical Center (5.1 miles)
• Huntington Memorial Hospital Nicu (5.2 miles)
• Usc-Norris Cancer Hospital (6.1 miles)
• LAC+USC Inpatient Tower (6.3 miles)

Theaters

• AMC The Americana at Brand 18 (0.9 miles)
• AMC Burbank 16 (4.8 miles)
• Universal Cinema AMC at CityWalk Hollywood (6.3 miles)
• TCL Chinese Theatre (6.4 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.1 miles)
• Walgreens (1.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.5 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.6 miles)
• Walgreens (1.6 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.9 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (1 miles)
• Proof Bakery (2.2 miles)
• Starbucks (2.9 miles)
• Lamill Coffee Boutique (4.1 miles)
• Charlie's Coffee House (4.7 miles)
• Starbucks Reserve (4.8 miles)
• Starbucks (4.9 miles)

Parks

• Glassell Park Recreation Center (2 miles)
• Cleland Ave Bicentennial Park (2.7 miles)
• Elysian Park (4.2 miles)
• Brookside Park (4.5 miles)
• Arroyo Seco Park (4.7 miles)
• Echo Park at the Lotus Festival (4.8 miles)
• Hahamongna Watershed Park (5 miles)

Transportation

• Union Station (6.1 miles)