Assumption Nursing Care in Glendale, CA

Pros

• The instructors are amazing.
• The school is great for LVN.
• They screen the students really well.
• They help graduates get jobs after they graduate.

Cons

• The reviewer paid the full course in cash for phlebotomy certification and felt robbed by the institution.
• They were charged an extra $500 on top of the $1,700 already paid after being absent for four sessions.
• They state the place is a scam and advise others not to go there.
• The facility is described as dirty and unprofessional.
• Communication between staff is poor, with no one providing timely updates.
• They stopped attending because CNA CEU prices were doubled.
• They claim the school takes money but does not issue certificates.
• They report that promised CEU certificates were never emailed or delivered after the stated timeframe.
• They allege discriminatory treatment, saying help is not offered unless the client is Filipino.
• They recommend finding another school.

Review

This Glendale program is best suited for motivated adults who want a fast, outcomes-focused path into nursing-related credentials and who prize strong classroom instruction and concrete job-placement support. When instructors are praised as exceptional and the program emphasizes screening for student readiness and facilitating post-graduate employment, the value proposition is real for learners ready to invest time and money in phlebotomy certification, CNA CEUs, or LVN pathways. The upside is a defined track and potential workforce connections; the downside is a landscape of opaque pricing and administrative friction that can derail plans if expectations aren’t matched by transparency and consistency.

For families navigating assisted living decisions, this offering functions more as a training program than a resident-care option. Those who need predictable costs, reliable certificate delivery, clean facilities, and steady, forthright communication will want to consider alternatives. Several reviews describe the campus and offices as dirty or unprofessional, a warning sign for anyone seeking a respectful, orderly learning environment. If pursuing this route, insist on verifiable accreditation, a clear schedule of refunds or rescheduling, and recent student testimonials beyond marketing materials to gauge real-world results.

The strongest positives, noted as instructors’ quality and the program’s selective screening, can materially support success on paper. A good instructor cadre can drive mastery, keep training rigorous, and help graduates land jobs after completion. That value, however, is threatened by major cons that repeatedly surface in reviews: dramatic price increases, unexpected mid-course charges, and aggressive attempts to collect fees. Administrative lapses compound the risk, with poor or inconsistent communication, delays in updates, and a lack of reliable systems to track student progress and enrollments. In this environment, educational gains may be real, yet they live alongside a fragile operational foundation.

Further, the credential delivery story adds another layer of caution. Some experiences point to job-ready preparation and credible employment pathways, while others recount repeated failures to issue certificates or long delays in delivering CEUs, sometimes after substantial time has passed. The inconsistency makes outcomes hard to predict. Learners counting on timely paperwork to advance to the next career step can find themselves stalled while the program’s internal processes stumble. That tension between strong teaching and flaky administration is the central friction point for families weighing this option.

Practical steps help mitigate risk. Request written confirmation of all current tuition and every fee, including any nonrefundable deposits and penalties for late payments. Obtain a documented refund and rescheduling policy, plus a clear timeline for when certificates will actually be issued and who will handle status updates. Verify accreditation and licensing with the appropriate regulatory bodies, and demand recent outcomes data from graduates to validate claims of job placement. Visit the campus to observe facilities firsthand, and speak with current students about admin communication and certificate processing. Specifically question how absences are handled, what make-up options exist, and whether language or cultural considerations are accommodated. Above all, insist on written agreements rather than verbal promises.

In the end, this community will work best for learners who value high-quality instruction and the potential for employer connections, and who can manage a nontrivial level of administrative risk with a proactive, evidence-based approach. If transparent pricing, timely credential delivery, a clean environment, and consistent communication are non-negotiable, then look for alternatives with steadier operations and clearer policies. The prudent choice is to pursue a program that pairs robust teaching with predictable administrative practices, ensuring financial and credential outcomes are secure rather than contingent on tireless follow-up.