1316 D N. Hume Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449
To contact a resident: (715) 384-9054
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Deerview Meadows Marshfield Costs & Pricing
Deerview Meadows Marshfield offers competitive pricing for its residential care services, particularly when compared to both Wood County and the broader state of Wisconsin. For a semi-private room, residents at Deerview Meadows pay $2,900 per month, which is significantly lower than the county average of $4,174 and also below the state average of $3,977. Similarly, for private accommodations, the monthly fee at Deerview Meadows is set at $3,000, making it more affordable than Wood County's rate of $3,970 and Wisconsin's average of $4,339. This pricing structure reflects Deerview Meadows' commitment to providing quality care that is accessible and economically feasible for families seeking long-term residential options in a supportive environment.
| Floor plans | Deerview Meadows Marshfield | Wood County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,900 | $4,174 | $3,977 |
| Private | $3,000 | $3,970 | $4,339 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$300 / mo
Cedar Ridge IV
$2,600 / month24.1 miles away -
from -$340 / mo
InnCare of Abbotsford
$2,560 to $2,915 / month20.1 miles away
Overall Review of Deerview Meadows Marshfield
Cons
The reviewer believed it was the worst choice they had ever made for their parent.- The community showed poor management and substandard living conditions, with residents left unattended.
- The community was not clean, and the staff did not seem to know what they were talking about.
- The home and its workers were not kept clean, and the workers should not be in this line of work.
- The community needed many adjustments to be able to care for someone needing assistance.
- The home was in poor condition and needed remodeling.
- The daily menu consisted of hot dogs and mac and cheese, which the reviewer would not place their father there.
- The reviewer felt that no stars would be more fitting.
- They attempted to call the community, but their call was never answered.
Review
Deerview Meadows Marshfield in Marshfield, WI is best avoided for any senior who requires reliable daily care. If pressed to identify a group for whom it might be marginally tolerable, it would be families with no viable alternatives and a willingness to endure substandard care. In practice, this community should be treated as a last-resort option only. For any family evaluating options, alternatives should be pursued aggressively. Look for facilities with demonstrable cleanliness, proactive maintenance, and staff who communicate clearly and promptly. It is essential to compare state inspection histories, read multiple independent reviews, and schedule unannounced visits. In short, the profile this community presents is not compatible with dependable support for most residents.
Across the eight reviews, a consistent verdict emerges: care quality and facility upkeep are unreliable. The star distribution tells the story: seven one-star judgments amid a single outlier that cannot redeem the overall impression. Reviewers describe dirty conditions, neglected spaces, and a building that feels worn rather than cared for. Several accounts allege residents were left unattended, with management failing to address serious safety concerns. Communications are repeatedly described as broken, calls not answered, staff lacking clear answers, and a sense that staff training and accountability are insufficient. Taken together, these threads suggest persistent operational instability rather than the routine challenges that accompany any aging property.
Safety and daily living collapse under the weight of these issues. The most alarming notes center on residents being unattended or inadequately supervised, which elevates fall risk and medication safety concerns. Management is repeatedly criticized for poor handling of problems and for a perceived lack of accountability to residents and families. The physical environment is described as not clean and in need of remodeling, with basic maintenance seemingly deferred. Such conditions not only erode dignity but also undermine the ability to support someone with needs for assistance with bathing, dressing, or mobility. In a setting where vigilance is critical, these lapses translate into real and recurring safety hazards.
Food quality and daily routines come under fire as well. Reviewers report disappointing menus and meals that feel out of step with basic nutritional expectations, including low-effort items like hot dogs and macaroni and cheese. While not every family can demand gourmet service, the standard implied by these choices signals a disconnect from resident wellbeing. Coupled with poor cleanliness and unresponsive staff, meals take on a symbolic weight: they reflect a broader sense that resident comfort and dignity are deprioritized. When care staff are uncertain or unavailable, the small routines of daily life, meals, housekeeping, and social opportunities, are left vulnerable to inconsistency and neglect.
From a decision-making standpoint, the absence of notable pros means the cons should drive the conclusion. The only argument some might make is convenience or proximity, but such factors are overshadowed by cleanliness problems, safety risks, and questionable management. Prospective residents should not expect robust engagement, reliable communication, or dependable care. If a family still considers it, it becomes essential to interrogate every benchmark: staffing ratios and turnover, caregiver training, incident reporting, and the steps taken when needs escalate. Insist on multiple in-person tours, ask to speak with current residents and families, and demand recent inspection or survey documents. Without tangible evidence of improvement, the risk is simply too high.
Bottom line: this community does not meet the basic expectations for assisted living, and alternative options should be pursued vigorously. The reviews point to a pattern of neglect, poor maintenance, and unsafe conditions that are not acceptable for someone needing daily support. Families should move toward facilities with demonstrated cleanliness, proactive communication, reliable staffing, and clear accountability. Use a structured checklist during tours, verify licensure and inspection outcomes, and seek out neighborhoods with active resident councils or strong caregiver engagement. If staying local is unavoidable, demand a formal action plan from the administrator with measurable targets and a defined timeline. In all likelihood, better choices exist, and they should be pursued before committing.
17 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cats allowed
Activities off-site
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services on-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Central Wisconsin (25 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Hospice waiver
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Lower-than-average pricing for 1- and 2-bedroom units.
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
How to Communicate with a Loved One Living with Dementia: 10 Supportive Strategies