Centracare Health System - Long Prairie
Save
20 Ninth Street Southeast, Long Prairie, MN 56347
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
Two separate accounts from people connected to Long Prairie care center describe troubling experiences tied to post-surgery rehabilitation and ongoing medical care. Both speak to concerns about staffing, responsiveness, and the quality of daily life for residents, with one focusing on a Memorial Day weekend that felt forgotten by the staff and the other detailing a family member's extended rehab stay that ended in worry, billing disputes, and questions about the facility's oversight. Taken together, the recollections sketch a picture of a facility where families feel stretched between the needs of patients and the limits of the day-to-day operations.
In the first account, a patient recovering from surgery arrived at Long Prairie with expectations shaped by a four-star rating they encountered, though they could not explain how that rating was earned. The visit occurred during Memorial Day weekend, a time the reviewer described as leaving the facility with "bare staff." The patient reported long waits for basic needs, sometimes 15 to 45 minutes before help arrived after pressing the call light. They described a stark lack of amenities: no television, and two straight-back chairs instead of a more comfortable setup. The bed lacked a hand control, so the patient could not adjust their own position and had to rely on staff to respond to calls for adjustments. Surgical site checks were infrequent - "one person checked my surgery site only one time" - and for pain management, there was a stark delay: after enduring significant pain, the patient initially declined narcotics in favor of Tylenol, but the pain intensified to the point where an hour passed before any relief was provided. The account notes a pattern of waiting, with pain management and basic comfort taking a back seat to other tasks. The patient did observe that the people who lived there and the staff seemed decent, but the overall operation - the management and the clock-like delays - were described as needing improvement. A broader complaint emerged about medication timing, with residents allegedly receiving medications late, sometimes around 10 PM, which added to the sense of neglect during an already difficult recovery period.
The same account also highlights environmental and procedural concerns that, to the reviewer, reflect systemic issues rather than isolated missteps. The reviewer pointed to a lack of air conditioning as part of the problem, insisting that a facility housing fragile post-surgical and medically complex individuals should not operate without climate control. While the heat is described more directly in the other account, this first narrative hints at an atmosphere of discomfort that compounds medical and logistical shortcomings. There is a palpable tension between the desire to rely on the facility's care and the frustration of watching basic dignity - timely pain relief, a calm environment, and accessible comforts - be compromised by what is portrayed as insufficient administration and staffing.
The second account shifts the focus to a family member who placed a parent in rehab following hospital care. Here the reviewer raises different red flags: staff shortages, expired licenses, and a lack of clear direction in care. The early days were described as disappointing, but the concerns intensified over the ensuing weeks. The reviewer recounts repeated ER visits and hospitalizations for their loved one, during which the patient moved farther from home and family support. They describe a frightening scene where the patient's oxygen saturation was dropping while staff continued with their duties, implying a disconnect between the acuity of the patient's condition and the level of attention being given. The family felt distressed by communications that were poor and inconsistent, with the sense that the patient was being kept in a compromised state to justify the admission and the continued stay. Even after the patient recovered sufficiently to move toward being closer to family, the plan did not materialize as hoped, and the family eventually moved their loved one elsewhere.
Billing is another thread in the second account that raises problems. The reviewer notes that after the last day of the patient's stay - on the 22nd - billing continued for the full month, despite requests for corrected statements. The reviewer offered a stark theory about the facility's purpose: if you place your loved one there, you might be sent there to die. While this is a strongly stated personal interpretation, it reflects the depth of worry and mistrust that the family experienced. The reviewer later asserts that their relative is now in a different setting - one where care is more properly monitored and safety is more clearly prioritized - and attributes the previous experience to a troubling misalignment of care quality, oversight, and communication. The pattern of expired licenses coupled with poor communication and ongoing billing disputes underscores a perception that regulatory and administrative gaps were contributing to unsafe or unsatisfactory care.
Across both accounts, several recurring themes emerge. First is the perceived gap between frontline care and facility administration. In the Memorial Day weekend scenario, long waits, lack of basic comforts, and delayed medications point to a fragile operating rhythm that makes it hard for patients to rest and recover. In the second account, persistent staffing shortages, license concerns, and unclear directives suggest deeper systemic strains that affect decision-making and safety. Second is the concern for patient safety and dignity, especially when signs of distress - like escalating pain or falling oxygen saturation - are not met with timely, appropriate responses. The combination of environmental discomfort (no air conditioning in a warm climate) and clinical lapses (delayed pain meds, inconsistent monitoring) seems to amplify the emotional toll on families who are already anxious about their loved ones' health. Third is the issue of trust and accountability, whether through the reliability of billings and statements or through the clarity of communications with family members. The second reviewer's billing dispute and the repeated requests for corrected statements highlight a frustration with administrative processes that feel opaque or inconsistent during vulnerable times.
For readers weighing care options, these accounts underscore several practical considerations. Verify staffing levels and shift coverage, especially around holidays when fatigue and shortages can be most acute. Check whether the facility maintains clear protocols for timely pain management and regular monitoring of surgical wounds or oxygenation, with transparent communication to families about delays and changes in care plans. Inquire about environmental conditions such as climate control, which can affect patients who are older or on certain medications. Finally, examine licensing and accreditation details, as well as how the facility handles billing, statements, and dispute resolution. While these accounts reflect individual experiences, they raise questions that prospective guests and their families may wish to investigate thoroughly before making a decision about where to pursue rehabilitation or post-acute care.
Ultimately, these narratives emphasize that the quality of rehabilitation and post-surgical care rests not only on staff skill, but also on the consistency of governance, communication, and infrastructure. Families deserve to feel that their loved ones are in a facility that is adequately staffed, properly licensed, and responsive to both medical and emotional needs. As care standards continue to evolve, prospective residents and their families may benefit from asking pointed questions about pain management policies, staffing rosters, environmental controls, and the mechanisms in place to ensure accurate billing and timely follow-up. In the end, careful due diligence can be a meaningful safeguard when navigating the challenging landscape of post-acute care.
The Centracare Health System - Long Prairie in Long Prairie, MN offers a comprehensive range of care services in a comfortable and well-equipped assisted living community. With a focus on skilled nursing facility care, residents can expect 24-hour supervision and assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. The staff is trained to provide specialized care for individuals with mild cognitive impairment and memory care needs.
The community boasts an array of amenities to enhance the comfort and well-being of residents. A beauty salon is available for personal grooming needs, while cable or satellite TV ensures entertainment options are readily available. Community-operated transportation is provided for both medical appointments and daily errands. For those who wish to stay connected online, there is Wi-Fi/high-speed internet access throughout the facility.
Residents can enjoy delicious meals served in a restaurant-style dining room, catering to special dietary restrictions. Additionally, meal preparation and medication management services are provided to ensure proper nutrition and medication adherence. Housekeeping services maintain the cleanliness of private bathrooms.
A variety of activities are offered to keep residents engaged and active. Planned day trips allow for exploration of the surrounding area, while resident-run activities foster social interaction within the community. Fitness programs promote physical well-being, and concierge services are available to assist with any additional needs or requests.
Located near cafes, parks, pharmacies, restaurants, places of worship, physicians' offices, and hospitals, Centracare Health System - Long Prairie offers convenience and accessibility to essential amenities within close proximity.
Overall, this assisted living community provides a caring environment that prioritizes the physical and mental wellness of its residents through high-quality care services and an abundance of amenities and activities.
Centracare Health System - Long Prairie is located at 20 Ninth Street Southeast, Long Prairie, MN 56347 in Todd County, Minnesota
Centracare Health System - Long Prairie offers a comprehensive range of features that significantly enhance the quality of life for residents with dementia or Alzheimer's disease. Assistance with dressing, bathing, and transfers ensures that individuals receive the support they need to maintain their personal hygiene and comfort, promoting dignity and self-esteem. Medication management is critical in ensuring the correct dosages are administered at the right times, which can alleviate confusion and potential health risks. Meal preparation and service cater to nutritional needs while fostering social interaction during meal times. Assistance with activities of daily living further supports independence within a structured environment. The provision of 24-hour supervision offers peace of mind for families, knowing that trained staff are always available to address any immediate needs or emergencies. Engaging residents through specialized memory care programming and mental wellness initiatives aids in cognitive stimulation, helping to slow progression and enhance mental clarity. Additionally, addressing mild cognitive impairment allows for early intervention strategies that can improve overall well-being and promote a sense of purpose among residents.
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
Vibrant Senior Living emphasizes active senior living communities that promote independence and engagement through diverse amenities and activities, fostering wellness and social interaction among older adults. These communities range from independent to assisted living, with a focus on personal growth, family involvement, financial planning, and leveraging technology to enhance residents' experiences.
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Assisted living provides moderate support for seniors seeking independence, while memory care offers specialized support for individuals with dementia or cognitive impairments through structured routines and trained staff. Key differences include care approaches, environment security measures, staff training levels, activity types, and cost considerations.
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Choosing between assisted living and nursing homes involves evaluating emotional and financial factors, with assisted living offering independence and support for daily activities at a lower cost, while nursing homes provide intensive medical care for individuals with significant health needs. The decision is influenced by personal preferences, health status, cognitive function, and varying Medicaid coverage across states.