2646 Yarmouth Drive, Wellington, FL 33414
To contact a resident: (561) 422-8120
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
A Compassionate Care Assisted Living Residence, LLC Costs & Pricing
A Compassionate Care Assisted Living Residence, LLC offers competitive pricing for its residents when compared to the broader market in Palm Beach County and Florida. For a one-bedroom suite, residents can expect to pay $2,583 monthly, significantly lower than the county average of $4,362 and the state average of $3,864. The facility's private room rates range from $3,255 to $6,000, which remains competitive despite Palm Beach County averaging at $4,444 and Florida at $3,699. Additionally, although semi-private rooms are priced at $4,800 - a bit higher than both the county ($3,592) and state averages ($3,009) - this reflects a commitment to providing quality care within a more personalized living space. Overall, A Compassionate Care Assisted Living Residence prioritizes affordability while maintaining high standards of care.
| Floor plans | A Compassionate Care Assisted Living Residence, LLC | Palm Beach County | Florida |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $2,583 | $4,362 | $3,864 |
| Private | $3,255 to $6,000 | $4,444 | $3,699 |
| Semi-Private | $4,800 | $3,592 | $3,009 |
Overall Review of A Compassionate Care Assisted Living Residence, LLC
Pros
The facility is clean.
The meals are healthy and delicious, prepared by a licensed dietician.
All rooms have LED flat-screen televisions, and laundry and housekeeping services, plus pharmacy and delivery services.
There is on-site doctor care.
Private and semi-private rooms are available.
24-hour supervision is provided.
The one-on-one care from the professional team is impressive.
The facility comes highly recommended for loved ones.
The place is nicely furnished and clean.
The staff patiently feed residents.
The facility allowed around-the-clock presence in the last week of life.
The kitchen and dining room were used to host meaningful events, such as a 90th birthday party.
The place is neat and clear, and the staff care for their clients.
Two young women run the facility with the greatest care.
Cons
Valrie did not follow through on what she said she would do for the mom.
There was an immediate price increase to provide the private room and extra care.
The extra-care staff privately asked for even more money.
The mother was placed in diapers and was never taken to the bathroom or to a shower.
She was bathed in bed and her hair was continually greasy and dirty.
There were no social or interactive activities for residents.
Valrie took 3.5 months to return the deposit and was rude when asked for the late fee.
Review
This community is best suited for seniors who prioritize medical oversight, nutrition-driven dining, and highly personalized attention within a clean, quiet environment. Families that want on-site doctor visits, pharmacy and delivery services, 24-hour supervision, and the option of private or semi-private rooms will find the core strengths of this residence compelling. The two strongest appeals are the professional, one-on-one care and the assurance that meals are designed by a licensed dietician, offering both health and flavor. However, for families where social engagement, a consistently transparent billing process, and a clearly stable leadership presence are non-negotiables, alternatives deserve careful consideration.
On the positive side, the facility earns credibility through a clean appearance and a demonstrated commitment to healthful living. The kitchen operates under the guidance of a licensed dietician, producing meals that residents and families alike describe as both healthy and tasty. Rooms come equipped with modern conveniences, including LED flat-screen televisions, and essential services such as laundry, housekeeping, and on-site pharmacy delivery help reduce daily stress for residents and their families. The presence of on-site medical oversight, including doctor visits, further strengthens the case for those who want a medical-oriented setting where concerns can be addressed promptly, rather than referred out to external providers.
Yet the most troubling concerns in the reviews center on governance and day-to-day care experience. One account describes a pattern of price increases tied to private rooms and additional care, followed by troubling conduct around extra charges and deposits. Even more alarming are reports of inadequate personal care: residents placed in diapers and not assisted to bathroom amenities or showers, with bed baths and greasy hair that suggest lapses in basic hygiene. There are also mentions of a lack of social or interactive programming, residents remaining in bed or in front of the TV, with little opportunity to socialize or participate in meaningful activities. Such experiences, if representative, challenge the facility’s ability to deliver a dignified, people-centered environment.
These conflicting threads force a nuanced assessment: the strong clinical and nutritional framework can offset certain logistical hurdles when staff consistently deliver high-quality, compassionate care and maintain transparent, fair billing practices. Where the positives shine, private and semi-private rooms, robust on-site services, and a dedicated approach to one-on-one care, they can substantially support a resident’s health stability and daily comfort. However, when payments feel opaque and care lapses occur, even the best-sounding program risks leaving families anxious and residents underserved. The contrast between the glowing testimony of long-term affiliation and the pointed cautions about billing and daily care underscores the need for rigorous due diligence.
For families weighing options, there are clear signals about who should look elsewhere. If social stimulation, structured activities, regular outings, or a consistently engaged activity calendar are essential, this community may fall short. If price predictability and scrupulous financial handling are priorities, the history described by one family warrants serious scrutiny and a candid discussion about billing policies, deposits, and what constitutes “extra care.” If leadership stability and predictable governance matter, the concerns raised about how concerns were handled and how deposits were managed should prompt calls for concrete assurances before committing. In short, this residence has strengths, but it will not satisfy every preference.
Actionable next steps are straightforward. Prospective families should request a candid meeting with the owners and care director to review staffing patterns, care plans, and response times for personal care needs. Ask to see a sample menu, a typical daily activity schedule, and a tour of the care areas to observe how staff engage residents individually. Seek a clear, written understanding of pricing, what triggers extra charges, and the exact policy on deposits and refunds. Speak with current residents and families who have firsthand experience, and verify the facility’s license status and recent state survey results. If these checks align with expectations, the residence can be an excellent choice for medically oriented, privacy-conscious seniors; if not, alternatives that emphasize social programming and billing transparency may better align with long-term goals.








Understanding Dementia Behaviors: Practical Insights and Strategies for Caregivers
When Dementia Sparks Anger and Aggression: Understanding the Connection and Ways to Cope
Dementia Behaviors: In-Depth Understanding and Effective Coping Strategies