25141 Highspring Ave, Newhall, CA 91321
To contact a resident: (661) 755-4128
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Majestic Senior Living, Inc Costs & Pricing
Majestic Senior Living, Inc offers competitive pricing for its services compared to both Los Angeles County and the broader California market. The monthly costs for a semi-private room at Majestic are $2,200, which is significantly lower than the county average of $3,349 and the state average of $3,333. For those seeking a studio, Majestic's price of $3,600 remains attractive when compared to Los Angeles County's $4,172 and California's $4,145. Interestingly, while Majestic charges $4,000 for a private room - slightly below the county's average of $4,197 - it is higher than the state average of $3,939. Overall, these figures suggest that Majestic Senior Living provides cost-effective options for residents looking for various accommodations in a competitive market.
| Floor plans | Majestic Senior Living, Inc | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,200 | $3,349 | $3,333 |
| Studio | $3,600 | $4,172 | $4,145 |
| Private | $4,000 | $4,197 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$400 / mo
Green Valley Home Care
$1,800 to $2,000 / month13.5 miles away -
About the same
Granada Hills Gardens
$2,200 to $3,500 / month8.1 miles away -
from +$300 / mo
Familycare Cottage IV
$2,500 to $4,500 / month20.9 miles away -
from +$300 / mo
Sunrise Guest Home
$2,500 to $3,000 / month13.3 miles away -
from +$200 / mo
Leisure Living
$2,400 to $3,000 / month20.2 miles away
Overall Review of Majestic Senior Living, Inc
Cons
The place sucks.- Workers smoke all day in the backyard.
- There is no parking.
- The owner is a jerk.
- The owner dismissed the neighbor’s complaint and accused him of harassing him.
- The reviewer questions why anyone would place elderly family members there.
Review
Majestic Senior Living in Newhall, California is best suited for families that must operate with a high degree of hands-on oversight and are prepared to tolerate a small, potentially under-resourced operation. The published experiences depict a setting where resident welfare depends more on relatives monitoring staff than on consistent, proactive care on site. The environment, as described, points to a tightly run operation where issues around staff behavior and management style can spill into daily life. For seniors who require stable routines, reliable supervision, and clear, respectful communication with leadership, this community is unlikely to deliver without significant family involvement.
Alternatives should be strongly considered for families prioritizing dependable staff, professional leadership, and convenient access for visitors. If parking is a practical hurdle for daily visits or if concerns about staff conduct and ownership approach are non-negotiable, other communities will likely offer a safer, more predictable experience. For seniors who value straightforward management, accessible parking for guests, and a welcoming, professional atmosphere, continuing the search elsewhere is prudent.
From the available feedback, there are no evident advantages documented that counterbalance the substantial drawbacks. The reviews do not present consistent signs of strong resident satisfaction, robust programming, or steady administrative support. In this context, the alleged smoking by staff in outdoor areas and the persistent parking challenge magnify core reliability concerns. A strained relationship with ownership, as described, further erodes confidence that care will be delivered with the expected degree of continuity and accountability. When positives are not apparent, the stated negatives take on decisive weight.
Families evaluating this option should insist on a thorough, in-person tour accompanied by conversations with frontline staff and with leadership. Clarify the staffing model: shift patterns, turnover, and how supervision is maintained during off-hours. Probe the property’s no-smoking policies in outdoor spaces and how those rules are enforced to protect residents with respiratory sensitivities. Assess parking logistics: visitor access, whether overflow arrangements exist, and how parking constraints affect emergency egress and staff safety. Request copies of recent state inspections, incident reports, and a sample care plan to gauge resident engagement, safety protocols, and the dignity afforded to residents on a day-to-day basis.
The resident experience appears particularly vulnerable in such an environment. Limited or compromised air quality from outdoor smoke can worsen health outcomes for seniors with heart or lung concerns. The parking shortage not only affects family visits but also complicates any need for urgent off-site appointments. A manager-employee dynamic that’s described as frictional or unprofessional raises serious questions about accountability, consistent care standards, and how complaints are addressed. In practical terms, the combination of these factors elevates risk for miscommunication, service gaps, and resident dissatisfaction, outcomes that should be unacceptable for a community entrusted with elder care.
The bottom line is that Majestic Senior Living, as reflected in the two negative reviews, presents substantial reasons to look elsewhere. If choosing a senior living option, prioritize communities with proven track records of steady staffing, professional leadership, ample and reliable parking for families, and a welcoming, well-regulated environment. Prospective residents should compare facilities by requesting detailed caregiver ratios, observing resident interactions during peak activity times, and verifying that leadership is accessible and responsive. In markets like Newhall, where choices exist, the prudent path is to favor options with transparent operations, consistent resident satisfaction, and a demonstrated commitment to safety, dignity, and family-friendly visitation.
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Activities on-site
Beautician on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Private
Respite or short term stays offered
Wheelchair accessible showers
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena (16 miles away)
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Meals provided
Small, intimate setting with personalized care
Understanding Dementia Through Its Seven Stages: A Comprehensive Look at Progression and Expectations
A Holistic Dementia Care Guide: Effective Strategies for Memory Support
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment