3802 N. 35th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85018
To contact a resident: (602) 279-2679
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Sinai Assisted Living Home Costs & Pricing
Sinai Assisted Living Home presents a range of accommodation options with monthly fees that reflect both its quality and the local market. For semi-private rooms, the cost is $3,000, which is slightly above the county average of $2,801 and the state average of $2,820. Private rooms and one-bedroom apartments are priced at $4,500 each, notably higher than Maricopa County's respective averages of $3,318 for private rooms and $3,473 for one-bedroom units. These pricing structures suggest that Sinai Assisted Living Home offers enhanced services or amenities that may justify the premium compared to other facilities in both Maricopa County and across Arizona.
| Floor plans | Sinai Assisted Living Home | Maricopa County | Arizona |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $2,801 | $2,820 |
| Private | $4,500 | $3,318 | $3,345 |
| 1 Bedroom | $4,500 | $3,473 | $3,532 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Sinai Assisted Living Home
Pros
The food looked very good.
The front patio courtyard was beautiful and clean.
The mother-in-law enjoyed sitting outside under the umbrella during meals.
They had a nice virtual tour experience, and the facility looked nice.
Delilah showed nicely sized rooms with nearby bathrooms and accessible showers, and the common space was roomy and pleasant for wheelchairs and walkers.
The home has a nice covered patio and a grassy area out back for everyone's enjoyment.
Residents could help with some meal preparations, and everyone ate together in a community setting.
The home felt homey and pleasant.
The staff and the owner quickly became a second family, delivering extra-mile care.
Cons
The reviewer found it hard to understand the person in charge due to a heavy accent.
The reviewer felt the facility seemed full.
The reviewer noted there were no private rooms available and that the private-room price kept rising, exceeding their budget.
The reviewer stated the facility falsely advertised a pool and hot tub that residents cannot use.
The grounds were described as horrible, with a dried, dead lawn.
The reviewer noted the backyard had huge dogs and was not resident-friendly.
The reviewer described being asked to pay extra for Medicaid clients, leading them to choose another home.
The reviewer felt the home was not recommended and that the owners lacked competence.
The reviewer said care was not adequate, with multiple safety issues and high caregiver turnover.
The reviewer stated the owner did not deliver on promises, there were verbal fights and police involvement, a deposit was not returned, and they would not recommend the facility.
Review
Sinai Assisted Living Home in Phoenix is best suited for families seeking a compact, homey environment where a dedicated ownerâoperator team delivers attentive, family-style care and residents share meals in a warm, communal setting. This community tends to resonate with seniors who value homemade food, a neighborly atmosphere, and the reassurance of caregivers who feel like part of the family. Itâs a humane, low-key option for those who want closeness and personal touch over formal programming or gleaming campus amenities. However, it is not the right fit for families needing a tightly regulated, highly transparent operation with rigid price protections or a large-scale facility with advanced memory-care infrastructure. For those demanding maximum predictability in pricing or highly structured care plans, alternatives should be explored.
The strongest positives here are the human connections and the crafted, home-like ambiance. Families consistently note that meals are well-regarded and that residents feel included and valued, with caregivers and the owners going the extra mile to create a loving atmosphere. The property affords pleasant outdoor spaces, a covered patio and grassy areas, that invite residents to sit, socialize, and enjoy the fresh air. Inside, rooms are described as adequately sized with nearby, accessible bathrooms and equipment to assist when needed, while common areas are generous enough for wheelchairs and walkers to move about comfortably. The routine of shared meals and opportunities to participate in light meal prep contributes to a sense of normalcy and belonging that many families prize in a residential care setting.
Yet the downsides cannot be ignored. Several reviews flag pricing inconsistencies and a lack of timely, clear communication on room availability and rates, with private rooms fluctuating in cost and some discussions ending without a satisfactory resolution. This makes it essential for prospective families to demand a detailed, written breakdown of charges, inclusions, and any potential write-ups before committing. Other practical concerns include a perception among some visitors that the facilityâs grounds or common spaces do not always meet expectations, one assessment cites a neglected lawn and dogs in the yard, while others praise a clean, homey interior, highlighting how subjective impressions can be. Safety and staffing concerns also surface in multiple accounts: caregiver turnover and past safety incidents point to inconsistency in day-to-day supervision, and a minority of reviews describe conflicts or governance pressures that colored a guest experience.
The key pros, caring, attentive staff; a warm, family-style culture; and welcoming, livable spaces, often offset these cons for families prioritizing personal connection and day-to-day comfort. For someone who sees a serene, intimate residence as a primary value, the sense of being treated like a welcomed guest in a family home can compensate for occasional friction over price or minor amenities. The consistent thread of caregivers forming genuine bonds with residents helps counterbalance the more troubling notes about administration or cost disputes, provided transparency is achieved early and expectations aligned. In short, when the residentâs well-being hinges on emotional warmth, the positives tend to be decisive.
Alternatives are worth considering for those who need more formal oversight, clearer pathways for memory-care support, or a facility with thicker guarantees around pricing and service guarantees. Families weighing options should be mindful of the reported issues around price changes, potential for staffing turnover, and the occasional perception of prioritizing revenue over care. If a smaller, quieter, and highly structured environment is preferred, or if you require a facility with a proven track record for consistent medical oversight and fewer reported governance concerns, exploring other Phoenix-area options may yield greater peace of mind and financial predictability.
For families committing to a tour, use the visit to gauge whether the personal touch truly translates into daily practice: observe caregiver interactions with residents, ask for current staff-to-resident ratios, request a sample weekâs menu, and insist on a detailed, written plan covering services included in the base rate. Clarify how safety incidents are managed, how often care plans are updated, and what happens if a resident needs more intensive assistance. Finally, demand a current, itemized ledger of all charges and a clear explanation of any anticipated price changes. If these align with your expectations, Sinai can deliver the comfort of a true home setting; if not, the search should continue with a sharper eye on transparency, cost stability, and formal care protocols.

























How to Communicate with a Loved One Living with Dementia: 10 Supportive Strategies
Comprehensive Guide to VA Nursing Homes: A Crucial Long-Term Care Resource for Veterans
Estimating the Expenses of At-Home Dementia Care: A Detailed Exploration
