Riverbend Apartments

Pros

• The townhome is recently renovated and nice.
• The property is beautiful.
• The roof doesn't leak.

Cons

• The management is messy and can't keep up with paperwork.
• Tenants are evicted based on rumors rather than proof.
• The townhomes are filled with drug addicts, with overdoses in the parking lots.
• They take the word of vulnerable tenants first (like toothless ladies) over others.
• A meth lab was busted in the parking lot, indicating unsafe conditions.
• Residents say the Edgewood management sucks.

Review

In Edgewood, Maryland, there's a townhome community that on the surface gleams with the sort of updated interiors and clean-looking fa?ades you'd expect from a recently renovated property. One observer calls the place "super nice" and notes that the townhomes are recently renovated, painting a picture of a bright, modern living space. Another reviewer echoes that sentiment, calling the property "beautiful" and implying that the upgrades have indeed refreshed the look and feel of the homes. Taken together, these comments set up a contrast: a visually appealing property that invites positive first impressions, even before you peel back the layer of everyday living in the community.

Yet the shine quickly dulls when the topic shifts from curb appeal to daily operations and safety. The same voices that praise the homes' aesthetics describe a management situation that feels chaotic and unorganized. The word "messy" appears repeatedly, with a blunt claim that management "can't keep up with any paperwork." This lack of administrative discipline, they say, spills over into the tenants' lives in real, tangible ways - most notably in eviction decisions that are described as being made on a "say-she-say" basis rather than on transparent, proven grounds. The tone suggests a sense of insecurity among residents, as if the system governing leases and removals is painted by rumor rather than by consistent policy and documented proof.

Beyond the paperwork and eviction concerns, there is a deeper sense of unease about the social environment inside the community. Reviewers describe the townhomes as being "filled with drug addicts," painting a picture of ongoing substance-related challenges that influence day-to-day safety and windows of risk for residents. The parking lots, in particular, are characterized as spaces where overdoses have occurred, turning what should be a routine part of living in a community into scenes of distress and danger. The rhetoric is stark and unvarnished, and it emphasizes a perception that the property struggles to manage behavior and safety in a way that protects all residents.

An additional line of critique centers on how disputes and complaints are handled. One reviewer asserts that management "will take toothless ladies' word first," a phrase that underscores a perceived bias in how complaints are weighed and addressed. The implication is that vulnerable tenants - perhaps older women or those who might be physically disadvantaged - are not given equal footing in the process, and that their statements may be treated as less credible in the face of conflicting accounts. This perception contributes to an overall sense that residents must navigate a system that favors certain voices over others, with real consequences for how secure they feel in their own homes.

The tone isn't entirely dispirited, however. There's a blunt acknowledgment of a concrete positive: a roof that doesn't leak. In the second account, the writer lists "Pros: roof doesn't leak." It's a concrete, tangible benefit - one aspect of the property that does work as advertised - and it stands out in a narrative otherwise dominated by concerns about management practices and safety hazards. The same reviewer sums up the overall impression with a sparse reflection: "Cons: could only think of one pro." That line distills the sentiment that, despite a sturdily construing roof, almost every other facet of living there feels outweighed by the negatives described.

Together, the two viewpoints sketch a complex portrait of a property that looks good on the outside but provokes strong reservations once you consider the lived experience inside. The renovated interiors and the non-leaking roof suggest a property that has the potential to be comfortable and attractive. Yet those advantages are described as overshadowed by management inefficiency, questionable eviction practices, and a perceived safety risk stemming from drug activity and public-order concerns. The juxtaposition creates a paradox: a place that could be desirable for its physical attributes, but that many potential residents would approach with caution given the described administrative and safety issues.

In a broader sense, the narrative signals the importance of due process and reliable management in rental communities, even when the living spaces themselves are appealing. Prospective residents hearing these accounts might weigh the visible upgrades against the reported struggles with paperwork, eviction processes, and safety incidents. The juxtaposition of a sturdy, leak-free roof with a pattern of alleged neglect in administrative duties and community safety can lead to a careful, even skeptical, evaluation of whether the place will truly meet long-term needs. The takeaway is not simply about cleanliness or aesthetics, but about how a community is governed and how secure residents feel when they navigate leases, disputes, and common areas.

If you're considering this Edgewood townhome community, it would be prudent to approach with a balanced mindset. Picture the updated interiors, the potential for solid structural features like a reliable roof, and the comfort that clean, well-maintained living spaces can provide. At the same time, take seriously the reports of management difficulties, concerns about eviction practices, and the presence of drug-related activity in common areas. If possible, talk to current residents, ask about the policy framework for evictions and complaints, and verify what safety measures the management has in place to address drug activity and emergencies. A firsthand sense of the community's day-to-day atmosphere - beyond the surface aesthetics - will be invaluable in determining whether this property can truly meet your housing needs.

Places of Worship

• New Mount Olive United Methodist Church (1.3 miles)
• Freedom Fellowship Church (2.6 miles)
• Belspring United Methodist Chr (5.6 miles)
• Childress Church of God (5.8 miles)
• Belspring Presbyterian Church (5.8 miles)
• Valley Harvest (5.9 miles)
• Newbern Christian Church (6.5 miles)

Restaurants

• El Charro Mexican Grill (1.5 miles)
• Applebee's (2.2 miles)
• Long John Silver's (2.4 miles)
• Little Caesars Pizza (2.5 miles)
• Cook Out (2.5 miles)
• Domino's Pizza (2.5 miles)
• Sharkeys (2.7 miles)

Hospitals

• Carilion New River Valley Medical Center (1.7 miles)
• Carilion New River Vly Med Center (1.7 miles)
• Mobile Medical Diagnostic System (3.5 miles)

Physicians

• Radford Orthopedic Center PC (1.7 miles)
• Derm One (2.4 miles)
• NRV Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (2.8 miles)
• Lewis Gayle Clinics (3 miles)
• Summit Women's Health (4.5 miles)
• Children's Choice Business Office (7.4 miles)
• Children's Choice of the New River Valley (7.4 miles)

Cafes

• Radford Coffee Company (1.8 miles)
• Panera Bread (9.8 miles)
• Starbucks (9.8 miles)

Pharmacies

• Radford Drug (1.9 miles)
• Medicine Shoppe (1.9 miles)
• Carilion Community Pharmacy (2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.2 miles)
• Kroger Pharmacy (2.3 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (3 miles)
• Carilion Clinic Community Pharmacy (4.2 miles)

Parks

• Bisset Park Playground (2.3 miles)
• Sparky's Run Dog Park (3.2 miles)
• Claytor Lake State Park (5.5 miles)
• Harry Dehaven Park (5.9 miles)

Transportation

• Enterprise Rent-A-Car (2.7 miles)

Theaters

• Regal New River Valley & RPX (9.4 miles)