Woodcrest Apartments

Pros

• Great affordable housing option for low-income families.
• Maintenance was always prompt, respectful, and professional.
• Manager at the time keep grounds clean and quite.
• Awesome management and Maintenance.

Cons

• The gym lacks air conditioning, the staff are rude and unfair, and things are constantly being turned on and off, with workers laughing at customers asking for help.
• The apartments need remodeling and are described as a mess.
• Management's solution to a water leak involved replacing toilets in four units, with tenants told they could move to a unit that was infested with roaches and bed bugs, and they were not allowed to view the unit before work.
• The manager is said to have lied and created more problems, with warnings that the place isn't safe or healthy.
• The office is frequently closed and staff seem lazy, making it hard to submit applications or get assistance.
• The HVAC has been broken for multiple summers, leaving an elderly resident sweating and management seemingly uncaring.
• Office staff are rude and unavailable to assist, and some units have mold with slow maintenance responses.

Review

The collection of reviews paints a picture of a property that inspires strong, conflicting feelings from its residents. A recurring thread is the mismatch between what some tenants expect from a modern, comfortable living environment and what they actually experience day to day. For many, the vibe is chaotic: ongoing remodeling efforts, patchy air conditioning, and a sense that amenities and infrastructure are unreliable or poorly managed. One reviewer captures a sense of misalignment between promises and reality, describing a space that seems stuck in a state of constant disruption - from the gym remodel to the climate control - and noting that these issues are accompanied by a staff culture that feels rude and unhelpful when residents seek assistance. The sentiment, at times, is decisively negative, with some tenants saying they would not renew their leases because the inconsistency and lack of responsiveness make living there untenable.

Amenities and building conditions are a focal point of discontent. Several reviews mention the absence or unreliability of key comforts, such as a functioning air conditioning system, especially during hot seasons. The pools, which should offer relief and recreation, did not come online until August in one season, leaving residents with very limited access during the prime summer period and, when available, concerns about cleanliness. A few testimonies emphasize a broader sense that the property is not meeting basic health and safety expectations, with complaints about mold and general maintenance neglect contributing to ongoing unease about the living environment. The tone across these accounts suggests that for some families, especially those with stricter budgets, these conditions are a persistent stress rather than a temporary hiccup.

The most troubling threads revolve around serious maintenance issues and how management handles them. Reports describe a years-long water leak situation that eventually led to a controversial "solution" of replacing toilets in several apartments. The proposed accommodations for residents who would be moved were criticized, with accusations that the alternative units included infestations. There are detailed accounts of residents being denied the opportunity to view units before work began, with the option to see them only after completion. Such experiences fuel a perception that the leasing and maintenance processes are reactive and opaque, rather than collaborative and transparent. When roaches and bed bugs enter the picture, it compounds health concerns and erodes trust in management's ability to protect tenant well-being. One neighbor's move to a unit beside a recently infested apartment, and the assertion that additional spraying would await the pest-control schedule, underscores a sense of ongoing vulnerability and delayed remediation.

Office accessibility and staff reliability emerge as another major point of friction. A number of reviews describe the on-site office as frequently closed, unresponsive, or unwelcoming. There are specific anecdotes about the office being hard to reach - phone calls not answered and applications not being processed in a timely manner. In some cases, tenants felt that the staff's behavior bordered on lazy or disorganized, making the process of leasing or addressing concerns feel frustrating and fruitless. The inconsistency in staffing and access to management appears to amplify the negative experiences, leaving residents feeling unheard and unsupported during times of need.

The sentiment is not uniformly negative, however. A minority of reviews celebrate the property as a strong option for certain residents. One reviewer notes that it can be an excellent affordable housing choice for low-income families, hinting at a beneficial price-to-value balance when other factors are not weighed as heavily. Another resident speaks warmly about a long tenure - four years - describing quiet surroundings, friendly neighbors, prompt and respectful maintenance, and an overall sense that the management and grounds were kept in good order during that period. These positive voices emphasize dependable maintenance, a well-kept environment, and a level of stability that contrasts with the more chaotic or problematic experiences reported elsewhere. They suggest that when conditions are right - and perhaps when certain staff members are aligned with residents' needs - the living experience can be quite solid.

Yet even within those positive memories, hints of variability persist. Some reviews that acknowledge positive experiences still flag broader concerns: over time, office staff vulnerabilities, claims of mold in some apartments, and references to particular staff members who were perceived as unhelpful or problematic. The overall tone across the mixed spectrum is that quality and service are not consistently reliable; experiences appear to depend heavily on which unit you're in, who is managing the property at the time, and whether critical maintenance issues are being addressed promptly. For potential tenants evaluating this property, the takeaway is a nuanced one: there are pockets of good maintenance and quiet, stable living, but these are interspersed with serious complaints about pests, health concerns, and inconsistent customer service that can dramatically affect daily life.

In sum, the reviews sketch a complex portrait of a community with mixed outcomes. A subset of residents report serious, ongoing problems - air conditioning failures, delayed plumbing repairs, infested units, dirty pools, and a management culture perceived as unresponsive or even hostile at times. These experiences are tempered by occasional praise for affordability, solid maintenance when it happens, and periods of quiet, well-kept living. The range of experiences suggests a property where tenure and satisfaction may hinge on factors like unit location, the timing of renovations, the specific on-site staff in charge, and the effectiveness of pest control and maintenance programs. For anyone considering moving in, the landscape is clearly mixed: there are attractive features and genuinely positive moments, but a pattern of unresolved issues and inconsistent management can create significant headaches for residents who require reliable comfort and responsive service.

This part of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma offers a variety of amenities and services that would be beneficial to seniors looking for a comfortable living environment. There are several places of worship nearby for spiritual fulfillment, as well as numerous restaurants and cafes for dining options. Additionally, there are several pharmacies and physicians within close proximity for easy access to healthcare services. The area also boasts several parks for outdoor recreation and relaxation. In terms of medical care, there are multiple hospitals in the vicinity, including VA hospital and St Anthony Hospital. Overall, this area provides a well-rounded community with convenient resources that cater to the needs of seniors.

Places of Worship

• Life Church TV Midwest City (0.9 miles)
• St Luke's United Methodist Church (5.1 miles)
• First Baptist Moore (7.8 miles)

Restaurants

• Pelican's Restaurant (1.2 miles)
• Sonic Drive-In (1.2 miles)
• Taco Bell (1.3 miles)
• Applebee's (1.3 miles)
• Sonic Drive-In (1.4 miles)
• Holliday Donuts (1.4 miles)
• IHOP (1.6 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.6 miles)
• Walgreens (2.2 miles)
• Walgreens (2.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3.3 miles)
• Walgreens (3.8 miles)
• Walgreens (4.4 miles)
• Homeland (6 miles)

Physicians

• Muhammad Amin MD (2 miles)
• Ruffin Jr Larry DO - Alliancehealth Medical Group (3.3 miles)
• Midwest Pain Consultants (3.3 miles)
• The Children s Hospital Ophthalmology (4.1 miles)
• Oklahoma Allergy and Asthma Clinic (4.2 miles)
• Tinker AFB Medical Clinic (4.2 miles)
• Oklahoma Blood Institute (4.3 miles)

Parks

• Kiwanis Park (2.3 miles)
• Happy Tails Dog Park (2.6 miles)
• Edgemere Park (6.5 miles)
• Davis Park (8.4 miles)

Hospitals

• VA hospital (4 miles)
• Cedar Ridge (4.1 miles)
• St Anthony East (4.1 miles)
• Presbyterian Hospital (4.2 miles)
• St Anthony Hospital (5.4 miles)
• Valir Rehabilitation Hospital (5.5 miles)
• Kimzey Mike-Oklahoma Center-Orthopaedic (7.5 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (4.6 miles)
• Harvey Bakery & Kitchen (5.2 miles)
• Starbucks (8.2 miles)
• Starbucks (8.3 miles)

Theaters

• Tinsel Town USA (5.4 miles)