Ardmore Village

Pros

• The people were very friendly even the residents.
• A wonderful place full of friendly people.
• Great food, fun activities, hard working staff.
• This is a very nice assisted living facility. Very pretty. Staffed with kind and caring personnel to care for your family members.
• Very nice people very nice and professional.
• It's beautiful and clean. The weekly day staff were usually nice and friendly.
• Retirement home very nice.
• The village is very appealing. Clean and quiet with many amenities.

Cons

• They are going to end up killing her.
• Their rules are overdone and decrease the quality of life for the elderly.
• They will not allow her to lower the AC below 75?, and the apartment temperature regularly rises above 90?, causing heat exhaustion.
• They intimidate her on a consistent basis.
• The facility is abusive.
• There are many threats toward residents.
• The weekend staff did not perform their duties and could not be reached for hours.
• A nurse left the resident on the floor for hours and did not ensure meals were delivered.
• The nurse should have called 911, but did not.
• The mother died two days later.

Review

The overall picture painted by these notes is one of a place that many people choose for its promise, and yet where real experiences can diverge dramatically. On one hand, the Lodge at Ardmore Village is described as a welcoming, attractive community that feels like a hopeful home for seniors who can no longer manage on their own. Several voices praise its beauty, its quiet atmosphere, and the sense of safety that comes from a structured living environment. Reviewers highlight friendly residents and a staff that some visitors find genuinely kind and professional. In these accounts, the village is described as clean, pleasant, and full of life, with a strong emphasis on social activities and engagement. The presence of a memory care neighborhood is repeatedly noted as a positive development, suggesting a facility that is paying attention to the different needs of its residents and expanding its care capabilities.

Yet beneath that pleasant surface runs a stark countercurrent of frustration, fear, and outright concern for the wellbeing of residents. One recurring theme is a sense that rules and routines, however well-intentioned, can become oppressive and dehumanizing. The narrator who is most distressed describes a daily environment that feels more controlling than caring, with temperature rules that seem to ignore the health needs of an elderly person who is sensitive to heat. The claim that the thermostat cannot be turned lower than 75 degrees, paired with reports of apartment temperatures spiking above 90 degrees, paints a troubling picture of living conditions that could compromise health. The fear is not just about discomfort but about the real risk of heat exhaustion for someone with vulnerabilities, which makes the described conditions feel perilous rather than peaceful.

This tension becomes even more acute when the acutely distressing issue of perceived abuse enters the narrative. The same account speaks to ongoing intimidation and threats directed at a resident with mental disabilities, a combination that raises red flags about the quality of care and the protection of residents' rights. The author expresses a sense of desperation, explaining that they intend to seek help from family members and external supports to secure a safer living situation for their mother. The emotional intensity of these claims is matched by specifics - such as the deployment of five staff members to inspect a one-bedroom unit - suggesting a climate of fear and control rather than a calm, respectful caregiving environment.

Interwoven with these concerns are other experiences that emphasize the complexity of long-term care. Some reviewers focus on the warmth of the staff and the overall quality of life that the facility can provide. They describe the lodge as a "very nice" place, full of friendly people and well-managed operations, where meals, social activities, and general care contribute to a fulfilling life for many residents. The presence of cheerful interactions between staff and residents, together with praise for the amenities and the social atmosphere, creates a perception of Ardmore Village as a viable option for families seeking structured care. For these voices, the environment is a place where a resident can thrive if they fit the right care plan and engage with the program offerings.

There are also accounts that reflect more mixed experiences, where reviewers acknowledge positive attributes but point to gaps in consistency and follow-through. One note, for instance, simply calls the environment "OK," which in context signals that while the facility has redeeming qualities, there may be frequent variability in the quality of care depending on the shift, the staff on duty, or the particular situation. Other reviewers emphasize the positive potential of the village - its beauty, clean surroundings, quiet atmosphere, and the availability of amenities - as features that make it appealing for long-term living. These pieces contribute to a nuanced picture: Ardmore Village can be a desirable home for many residents under the right circumstances, but not every experience guarantees that standard of care or comfort.

Perhaps the most heart-wrenching aspect of the collection comes from a reflection on a specific, troubling incident. One account recounts a severe breakdown in care during a period when the resident had pneumonia and tested positive for COVID. The narrative alleges systemic failures: difficulty reaching staff, a nurse who did not check on the resident, meals that were not delivered, and a resident left unattended for an extended period. The crisis culminates in a sequence where a staff member finally intervenes, but the effects are grave - the resident allegedly died two days later, with the restrictions surrounding COVID further complicating family access. This stark portrayal underscores how fragile and perilous moments in elder care can become if communication, staffing, and oversight falter, and it challenges any assumption that a pleasant public image necessarily reflects daily reality for every resident.

Against this backdrop of praise and peril, other testimonies emphasize the aspirational aspect of Ardmore Village. There are expressions of personal longing and hope, including statements that align with the idea of the village as a future home for someone who can no longer live independently. The reflections convey a sense that, despite the serious concerns raised elsewhere, the concept of a community designed for aging with support remains compelling. The positive tone about the care possibilities, the environment, and the structured lifestyle resonates with families looking for safety nets and opportunities for social engagement as they plan for the years ahead.

Taken together, the collection presents a layered portrait of The Lodge at Ardmore Village. On the plus side, the facility is praised for its aesthetics, its friendly residents, the warmth of several staff members, its organized activities, and its investment in memory care options. These points illustrate why families may choose Ardmore Village as a viable option for seniors who want companionship, activities, and professional care. On the minus side, there are deeply troubling concerns about how residents are treated, how rules are enforced, and how care is delivered in moments of medical distress. The temperature control issues, the alleged intimidation, and the reported lapse in critical care during an illness point to serious gaps that would understandably alarm any family member hoping for safety and dignity for a loved one.

For families currently evaluating Ardmore Village, these contrasting experiences suggest a careful, nuanced approach. It may be worth visiting multiple times, speaking with staff across shifts, asking for recent care plans and incident reports, and consulting an independent elder care ombudsman or regulatory authority to understand current compliance and quality standards. If you are worried about a loved one, documenting concerns, seeking a second opinion on livability and safety, and exploring alternatives that might offer stronger protections could be prudent steps. Above all, the stories here emphasize that while a senior living community can offer warmth, community, and care, the true measure of its value lies in consistent, compassionate, and vigilant support for every resident's health, dignity, and autonomy.

Restaurants

• Carl's Jr. (0.5 miles)
• Wendy's (0.6 miles)
• A&W Restaurant (0.6 miles)
• Burger King (0.7 miles)
• Taco Bell (0.9 miles)
• Taco Bueno (1 miles)
• El Tapatio Mexican Restaurant (1 miles)

Physicians

• Ardmore Medical Center (0.7 miles)
• Pulmonary Medicine Clinic (0.7 miles)
• Fore Baker DO (0.7 miles)
• Memorial Medical Clinic (0.8 miles)
• Jeffrey A Rother Md (0.9 miles)
• Valerie Nicole Jolly, MD (0.9 miles)
• Ardmore Surgical Associates (0.9 miles)

Places of Worship

• House of Prayer (0.7 miles)
• Water Willows Fire Metaphysical & Reiki (0.8 miles)
• Crystalrock Cathedral (0.9 miles)
• Maxwell Avenue Church of Christ (0.9 miles)
• McLish Avenue Church of Christ (1.8 miles)
• The Diocese of Oklahoma (1.9 miles)
• Faith Family Church (2 miles)

Hospitals

• Mercy Memorial Health Center (0.7 miles)
• Davita Healthcare (1.6 miles)
• Oklahoma Families First (1.8 miles)
• Ellis Health Center (6.3 miles)
• Mercy Health-Wilson (16.2 miles)
• Mercy Health Love County (17.7 miles)
• O'Connor J T Jr DO (17.7 miles)

Cafes

• Uncle Louie G's (0.8 miles)
• Starbucks (1.4 miles)
• Fat Billy Cafe (5.5 miles)

Pharmacies

• Homeland (1.3 miles)
• Steele Drug Co. (1.4 miles)
• Sunny Stretch Medical Dispensary (1.4 miles)
• Medicine Shoppe Pharmacy (1.7 miles)
• Reed Family Pharmacy (1.7 miles)
• Lone Grove Drug (6.7 miles)
• Total Returns-Rx-Outdated Products (18.1 miles)

Transportation

• Railroad Crossing (2.8 miles)
• Ardmore Aviation (3.3 miles)
• U-Haul (4.5 miles)

Parks

• Lake Murray State Park (9.1 miles)
• Turner Falls Park (16.1 miles)