4600 Humboldt Ave N, Minneapolis, MN 55412
To contact a resident: (612) 588-2303
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Shingle Creek Commons Costs & Pricing
Shingle Creek Commons offers competitive rental rates that stand in stark contrast to the broader housing market in Hennepin County and Minnesota as a whole. For example, a one-bedroom unit at Shingle Creek Commons is available for just $724 per month, significantly lower than the county's average of $3,550 and the state average of $2,893. Similarly, two-bedroom units are priced at $1,015, compared to Hennepin County's average of $3,848 and Minnesota's statewide rate of $2,955. This affordability positions Shingle Creek Commons as an appealing option for individuals and families seeking quality housing without breaking the bank in a challenging market.
| Floor plans | Shingle Creek Commons | Hennepin County | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $724 | $3,550 | $2,893 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $1,015 | $3,848 | $2,955 |
Independent Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Shingle Creek Commons
Pros
The Minneapolis community is particularly nice.
The communities are comfortable, clean, and well maintained, with friendly and accepting residents and staff.
The library is comfortable for reading and study, with an organized and accessible collection.
The homes are beautiful, and the director is informative, providing a grand tour.
The setting feels homey and like a place to call home, with a clean and clear atmosphere that fosters ease.
Shingle Creek Neighborhood Association does great things in the community.
Cons
The building does nothing for its residents.
The library collection is not grand.
The library has few paperbacks.
The library has few reference volumes.
The building needs an upgrade.
The building has no air conditioning in the summer.
There is no regular communal dining.
Review
Shingle Creek Commons in Minneapolis is best suited for independent seniors who want a warm, home-like atmosphere with a clearly welcoming staff and a resident community that feels comfortable and accepting. This is not a facility built around high-end amenities or heavy programming; it is a practical, low-stress option for those who value cleanliness, a tidy living environment, and a neighborhood feel. Prospective residents who want a straightforward, independent living arrangement with a friendly, approachable team will find this community aligns with those expectations, especially in the Minneapolis area where the personal touch from staff and leadership is evident.
Those weighing alternatives should note where this community may fall short for certain needs. If daily meals and structured dining experiences are a priority, or if medical or caregiver support beyond routine housekeeping is required, this setting may not meet expectations. Potential residents who require consistent climate control, modern infrastructure, or more extensive on-site programming will likely want to explore other options. The absence of regular communal dining and the limited notion of library resources suggest a preference for self-directed routines rather than a fully supported senior living plan.
The most tangible positives revolve around comfort, cleanliness, and a welcoming demeanor. Residents and staff are described as friendly and accepting, and the environment feels well maintained with a reassuring level of tidiness and a clean, home-like smell. The space projects a sense of ease from the moment of entry, and a director who provides thorough tours helps set clear expectations for what independent living here entails. For families seeking reassurance that their loved ones will be in a calm, respectful setting, these elements carry substantial weight and can offset practical gaps in services or amenities.
Library access, while not expansive, offers a usable nook for reading and study, organized with clear categories and author-based shelving. It signals a community that values quiet, personal space as a complement to independence. This aligns with residents who are content to curate their own leisure activities rather than rely on a bustling activity calendar. The overall cultural vibe, neighborly associations, local community engagement, and a sense of belonging, reinforces the appeal for residents who prize a calm, intimate environment over a dynamic, resort-style setting.
Yet the building itself shows signs of aging and would benefit from upgrades, particularly in climate control, as there is no air conditioning noted in the warm months. For households sensitive to heat or seeking modernized infrastructure, this is a meaningful drawback. The lack of regular dining options also means the community isnāt a one-stop solution for social meals or assisted living supports; residents must plan meals independently or seek off-site dining. These practical gaps temper the otherwise strong, homey appeal and make it essential for families to weigh comfort and community against the need for more comprehensive care and contemporary amenities.
In decision terms, this community is a strong fit for independent seniors who prize a welcoming, well-kept home base in Minneapolis and who can live with occasional gaps in services, dining options, and climate-enhancing features. It is less suitable for those who require regular assistance, scheduled meals, or robust on-site programming. Alternatives with built-in dining, stronger climate control, and newer infrastructure will serve those needs more completely. With its 4 out of 6 rating, Shingle Creek Commons earns trust for its atmosphere and staff, but families should clearly map the expected level of daily support against the comfort and independence they require.










Supportive Employee Benefits That Help Caregivers Attain Better Work-Life Harmony
Top Cars for Senior Drivers and Essential Safety Innovations
A Closer Look at Private Pay Home Care