116 Cherry st, Williams Bay, WI 53191
To contact a resident: (262) 245-7320
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Sherwood Lodge LLC Costs & Pricing
Sherwood Lodge LLC offers monthly rates that reflect a premium for its unique amenities and services, with costs significantly higher than both Walworth County and the broader Wisconsin market. For instance, their one-bedroom unit is priced at $3,520, which exceeds the county average of $2,851 and the state average of $3,412. Similarly, their two-bedroom accommodations are listed at $5,535, starkly surpassing Walworth County's more affordable rate of $2,252 and Wisconsin's average of $3,111. This pricing structure suggests that Sherwood Lodge LLC positions itself as a high-end option for those seeking enhanced living experiences in comparison to local alternatives.
| Floor plans | Sherwood Lodge LLC | Walworth County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $3,520 | $2,851 | $3,412 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $5,535 | $2,252 | $3,111 |
Overall Review of Sherwood Lodge LLC
Pros
The staff and management at Sherwood Lodge are impressive, ensuring residents have activities and feel involved in an active life.
The facility is clean, the apartments are gorgeous, and the staff are accommodating and friendly.
The care at Sherwood Lodge has been great, and residents' families are happy and would highly recommend it.
The kitchen staff is great, and residents enjoy the food.
The new dietary aide is really nice, and the food was excellent.
Kim, the previous manager, was second to none.
The community is close to home and offers private apartments with care, while keeping residents well informed and providing transportation to appointments.
The activities department offers a variety of enjoyable activities for residents.
The director Heather is personally involved in residents' care and communicates with families.
The maintenance staff is prompt and respectful.
Cons
The facility has had problems keeping a decent cook, so meals are not the best some days.
Although the facility is nice, many apartments lack outside-facing windows, which negatively impacts residents' mental health.
The lack of windows diminishes the value overall given the cost.
Management ignores residents and their concerns.
The new manager won't speak to anyone and won't look at residents in the eye; she is mean to residents.
The place is described as having homeless and terrible working conditions; staff is a joke; the place is dirty; employees look high.
The facility does not provide baths or showers as scheduled.
Nurses steal narcotics.
It takes up to an hour to answer call lights.
One reviewer calls the facility one of the worst nursing homes; a family member was hospitalized after care; there was no therapy and not fed; concerns about survival; a complaint is being filed.
Review
Sherwood Lodge is best suited for seniors who want an active, socially rich living environment with you-are-there care, and for families near Williams Bay who value accessibility, clean surroundings, and a plausible mix of independence with support. The community shines when it comes to programming, personal attention from staff, and a sense of daily purpose: residents can participate in a broad slate of activities, outings, and spiritual offerings, and they benefit from on-site amenities such as a theater, chapel, and regularly scheduled events. Apartments are private and comfortable, with the added perk of in-unit laundry for many residents, reinforcing a feeling of home while still receiving care. For someone who prizes daily engagement and a warm, community-oriented vibe, Sherwood Lodge delivers.
Those considering alternatives should weigh several cautions. The most decisive red flag for many is the inconsistency in governance and responsiveness. Multiple reviewers report that management can be hard to reach or appear to ignore concerns, and a transition in leadership left some families uneasy about accountability and communication. There are also troubling anecdotes about staff reliability and safety issues raised by a minority of residents and families, including long delays for assistance, uneven caregiving, and, in extreme statements, allegations about understaffed conditions. Prospective residents who require a consistently visible, hands-on administrator and a spotless safety record may find this tension material enough to explore other options. Also note the design reality: several apartments do not face outside windows, a factor some families deem important for mood and cognitive well-being.
The strongest offsets to these concerns come from the genuine care demonstrated by many front-line staff and from the programmatic strengths. The facility is repeatedly described as clean, aesthetically pleasing, and well maintained, with friendly, accommodating staff who are willing to go the extra mile. Families highlight caregivers who coordinate with doctors, arrange transportation to appointments, and keep loved ones engaged through a robust calendar of activities, crafts, movies, and social outings. The executive leadership, when present and engaged, is praised for listening and resolving issues, and certain managers have earned lasting trust by handling problems promptly and personally. Food quality is variable but can be excellent, and when the kitchen is at its best, residents and families notice the difference in taste and portion size.
However, the main con, the perception of uneven leadership presence and reliability, does not vanish simply because some residents thrive. The combination of shifting management, reputational concerns about staffing norms, and a few highly negative resident experiences create a legitimate sense of risk for families seeking a uniformly high-standard experience. When problems do arise, the response can be inconsistent: one reviewer credits the director with hands-on involvement, another notes a lack of eye contact and approachability from a newer manager. Add in a few harsh anecdotes about maintenance, cleanliness, or safety, and the argument for caution becomes persuasive enough to warrant direct scrutiny during tours and conversations with current residents.
In practical terms, Sherwood Lodge can be a strong choice for those who prioritize an active lifestyle, family-like staff interactions, and a homey apartment setting, provided the family is comfortable with a degree of leadership variability. The upside, vibrant activities, accessible transportation, a sense of community, and clearly willing caregiving staff, often translates into meaningful quality of life gains for residents who fit that profile. The downside, occasional management gaps, mixed experiences with care consistency, and design considerations like limited exterior light, can erode perceived value if these factors matter most. The decision hinges on whether social engagement, personal connections with staff, and a pleasant physical environment outweigh the risks associated with leadership visibility and care reliability.
For families seriously considering Sherwood Lodge, a disciplined due-diligence plan is essential. Schedule multiple visits at different times, and insist on meeting both the administrator and direct caregivers. Talk to current residents about call-light response times, bath and hygiene routines, and how concerns are handled. Inspect the apartments personally to confirm window orientation and overall livability, and request a transparent breakdown of all costs, including any add-ons, to assess true value given the variability in meal quality and reported inconsistencies in service. Finally, compare against nearby options with stronger governance structures or more uniform clinical oversight to ensure the chosen path aligns with the residentās care needs, budget, and expectations for daily life.























Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs






