112 S. River Blvd., Plymouth, WI 53073
To contact a resident: (920) 893-8334
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
KindredHearts of Plymouth Costs & Pricing
KindredHearts of Plymouth offers competitive pricing for its one-bedroom accommodations, with a monthly cost of $3,948. This rate is slightly above the average for Sheboygan County, where similar options are available at approximately $3,898. Comparatively, the broader Wisconsin market reflects an even lower average cost of $3,412 for one-bedroom units. While KindredHearts may be positioned at a premium relative to both county and state averages, this pricing can often be indicative of the specialized services and personalized care that residents receive, ensuring a supportive and enriching environment.
| Floor plans | KindredHearts of Plymouth | Sheboygan County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $3,948 | $3,898 | $3,412 |
Overall Review of KindredHearts of Plymouth
Pros
It is a very nice place.- The staff are very pleasant and informative.
- The grandmother seems happy in the home.
- KindredHearts allows her to have her cat in her room.
Cons
Guests and families feel unwanted by the caregivers and faculty.- They are talked down to.
- The reviewer would not send anyone they know or love there.
- The staff sometimes fails to contact her grandmother's health Power of Attorney after a fall.
- The center is understaffed, resulting in less-than-perfect care.
- Her grandmother was given the wrong medication for an entire day.
Review
KindredHearts of Plymouth is best suited for seniors who want a small, home‑like feel, where staff warmth and a pet-friendly environment can translate into everyday comfort. It fits residents who are moderately independent and require light assisted-living support rather than intensive medical oversight. Families seeking an affordable option with a personal touch will likely appreciate the welcoming atmosphere and the ability to keep a beloved pet in the room. The setting can feel less clinical and more homelike, which matters for everyday happiness. The caveat is clear: the moment care needs begin to include frequent medical monitoring or rapid response to health changes, this community’s fit starts to narrow. It is not the right choice for escalating care demands.
Those who should consider alternatives are families prioritizing consistent, proactive medical oversight, strong staffing levels, and dependable communication with family members after falls or medical events. If staffing appears variable or if information flow between caregivers and relatives is unclear, seek a community with a reputation for seamless family coordination and higher care acuity. For residents whose standard of living hinges on rigorous medication management, regular safety checks, and a culture of clear accountability, more established operators may deliver greater peace of mind. In short, this community can work when expectations align with a modest level of care and a lower budget; it raises red flags for higher medical needs or demanding communication standards.
On the upside, the setting earns praise for being a very nice place with pleasant staff and informative communications. The pet‑friendly policy, allowing a cat in the room, addresses a meaningful emotional need for many residents and families. Observers note a genuine warmth among some caregivers, and one example shows administration willing to acknowledge and take responsibility when mistakes occur. A grandmother who moved in reportedly seems happy enough, which signals that daily life can be comfortable for many residents. These advantages matter because they offset, to some degree, the intangible benefits of a home‑like environment and friendly faces. Yet these positives do not erase the real risk of care gaps when staff are stretched thin or when critical health decisions hinge on timely follow‑up.
However, the cons are substantial enough to influence a decision away from this community for many families. Understaffing translates into less‑than‑ideal oversight, slower responses, and the potential for routine mishaps such as medication errors. Instances where falls were not followed up with timely POA notification raise questions about governance and accountability. A pattern of caregivers talking down to families erodes trust and makes daily care feel impersonal, not supportive. While one family notes accountability after an incident, the overall impression remains that staff availability and professionalism can be inconsistent. The reality is that more expensive or larger operators often offer stronger care coordination and higher safety standards; for families weighing long‑term plans, those differences can be decisive.
To navigate these realities, prospective residents should insist on concrete assurances before move‑in: clear staffing ratios during day and night shifts, defined protocols for falls and medication administration, and explicit lines of communication to POAs or family designated contacts. Request a trial period or a staged move‑in to observe how caregivers engage with residents and families under pressure. Verify that any incident, especially medication changes or misfills, receives prompt review, documentation, and accountability. Speak with current residents or families about daily interactions with staff, and set expectations for respectful, informative updates. By pressing these questions, families can determine whether the warm veneer translates into consistently reliable care or remains a welcome but imperfect backdrop.
When the priority is a warm, pet‑friendly, financially accessible setting and the willingness to tolerate occasional care gaps, KindredHearts of Plymouth can be a workable choice. It delivers daily comfort, a humane atmosphere, and friendly faces that matter to seniors seeking dignity and independence. However, for those whose nonnegotiables include unwavering medical oversight, flawless medication management, and consistently respectful family engagement, alternatives deserve serious consideration. In such cases, families should prioritize communities with proven staffing stability and tighter care protocols, even if that means a longer search or a higher price tag. In practical terms, this is a community to shortlist for careful evaluation, with clear go/no‑go criteria anchored in care reliability and family communication.
Assisted Living
Memory Care
Skilled Nursing Facility
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities on-site
Beautician on-site
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Laundry
Respite or short term stays offered
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
English
22 Remarkable Caregiver Support Groups Available Online and In-Person
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs