10320 South Hummingbird Lane, Oak Creek, WI 53154
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Auberry House Costs & Pricing
Auberry House offers a competitive monthly rate for private accommodations at $2,800, which is significantly more affordable compared to the average costs in Milwaukee County and throughout Wisconsin. In Milwaukee County, similar private rooms are priced at approximately $4,513, while the state averages around $4,339. This substantial difference in pricing positions Auberry House as a cost-effective option for individuals seeking quality care without compromising on comfort. It provides an attractive solution for families exploring assisted living options that balance value with essential services in a welcoming environment.
| Floor plans | Auberry House | Milwaukee County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $2,800 | $4,513 | $4,339 |
Overall Review of Auberry House
Pros
The staff were very friendly and helpful.
The place was nice and the visit went very well.
There is a very positive feeling regarding the whole experience.
The food has received very favorable comments.
The security has been very good so far.
Cons
The facility is not a good place for someone with dementia or Alzheimer's, and the staff are not trained to help these clients.
There are no activities for residents.
The care for a loved one is poor.
The facility is run like an army camp, where residents are told when to wake up, what to wear, and how to behave.
Residents are expected to go to the bathroom on command because staff are removing trash and do not want solid waste in the bins.
They even remove residents’ Depends before you can sit on the toilet.
Residents are told what to do and how to do it, and staff do not want residents to use their own judgment.
Residents are not allowed to get a drink of water without asking staff.
There is a language barrier.
The staff and management allow resident bullying.
The staff leave the building to smoke, make personal phone calls, and move cars.
Residents are left unsupervised for 30 to 45 minutes, while eating and sleeping.
This caused many falls and accidents.
The reviewer would not recommend this place.
The manager is rude.
One resident said there are barely any activities.
Review
Auberry House in Oak Creek is best suited for seniors who want a clean, secure, and routine-oriented living environment where meals and safety are reliable, and who do not require intensive memory-care or highly engaging programming. The community appears to deliver on basic housing needs, with quiet rooms, decent security, and consistently favorable impressions on food and overall accommodations. It is especially aligned with residents who value predictability, a straightforward daily rhythm, and a setting that emphasizes a contained, orderly atmosphere over stimulation. In short, this is a sensible option for someone who is largely independent or needs light assistance and does not require dementia-specific support.
Those weighing Auberry House should explicitly consider alternatives if memory challenges are a primary concern or if a highly interactive activity calendar is non-negotiable. The reviews indicate that a resident with dementia or Alzheimer’s would be poorly matched here, due to a lack of staff training in memory-care needs and a defensible risk of insufficient supervision. Families seeking robust, person-centered cognitive support, highly responsive care plans, and proactive engagement outside the dining room should look at facilities with dedicated memory-care tracks. Additionally, anyone who prioritizes a warm, consistently respectful management style and a vibrant activity program may find options elsewhere more compelling.
The strongest positives, cleanliness, solid security, and staff friendliness, do provide a solid foundation for comfort and peace of mind. When residents are capable of maintaining routines with limited assistance, these attributes translate into reliable daily life: safe navigation, predictable meal experiences, and a sense of being cared for by approachable staff. The favorable impressions on food quality further support day-to-day satisfaction, reducing the stress of mealtime for families and residents alike. These advantages offset some concerns insofar as a resident’s needs stay within basic custodial and security limits, and when interactions remain courteous and respectful.
However, the weight of the drawbacks cannot be overstated. The most consequential risk is the facility’s suitability for individuals with cognitive impairment, given reports of inadequate dementia-specific training and supervision gaps. The perception of an overly controlled, “army camp” routine, combined with claims that residents are told exactly how to behave and when to use the bathroom, points to a disempowering environment that can exacerbate confusion or agitation for some seniors. Add in suggested language barriers, episodes of bullying among residents, staff stepping away to smoke or make personal calls, and long periods without supervision during meals or sleep times, and the potential for falls or neglect grows uncomfortably large for memory-care needs or mobility concerns.
Decisive steps for families evaluating Auberry House include probing frontline training in dementia care, exact staff-to-resident ratios during peak hours, and the degree of daily activity programming. It is essential to request specifics on hydration policies, spontaneous access to water, and how incidents are documented and addressed. Visitors should directly observe activity offerings, staff engagement with residents, and the ease with which residents can participate in social or therapeutic programs. A candid exchange about management style, responsiveness to concerns, and any recent improvements or commitments from leadership will reveal whether the understated strengths can withstand future care demands.
Ultimately, Auberry House can be a practical choice for a subset of seniors: those who prize a clean, secure environment, reliable meals, and courteous service, and who do not require memory-care support or a richer activity calendar. For families facing dementia-specific needs, or for residents who crave robust, proactive engagement and a consistently warm, empowering atmosphere, more suitable options exist. The verdict hinges on the resident’s cognitive status, mobility, and desire for meaningful daytime structure; when those fit the facility’s profile, Auberry House delivers solid value. When they do not, alternatives with stronger clinical capability and more expansive programming are worth pursuing.







How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing