202 Lakewood Terrace, Marshall, WI 53559
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
So Close To Home Costs & Pricing
So Close To Home offers competitive pricing for its room types, with costs that generally align closely with both Jefferson County and the broader Wisconsin market. For private rooms, residents can expect to pay between $3,850 and $6,112 monthly, which places their offerings slightly below the county average of $4,385 and the state average of $4,339. Meanwhile, studio accommodations are available at a flat rate of $3,850 - more affordable than the county's average of $4,197 and comfortably in line with Wisconsin's average of $3,999. This pricing structure highlights So Close To Home's commitment to providing value while ensuring residents can enjoy a comfortable living experience within a nurturing environment.
| Floor plans | So Close To Home | Jefferson County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $3,850 to $6,112 | $4,385 | $4,339 |
| Studio | $3,850 | $4,197 | $3,999 |
Overall Review of So Close To Home
Pros
Katrina makes it feel like home.
The facility is clean, comfortable, and well maintained.
The staff are caring, compassionate, and professional.
Katrina is wonderful, helpful, kind, and professional.
So Close to Home feels like family.
The food is amazing.
Residents feel safe and welcomed in a home-like environment.
The management is awesome and responsive.
The atmosphere is homey, organized, and well run.
The care is high quality and residents are well cared for.
Cons
The facility is not a nice place and is run very poorly.
The reviewer would not recommend this place to anyone.
Review
So Close To Home in Marshall, WI is best suited for seniors who want a clearly home-like, small-community atmosphere where staff know residents by name, routines feel familiar, and caregivers form personal connections. The leadership of Katrina shapes daily life here, and her hands-on, caring style anchors trust for families seeking reliable consistency. This is not a flashy campus; it is a practical setting where comfort, safety, and predictable daily rhythms matter as much as basic medical oversight. For families prioritizing warmth, transparent communication, and a sense that a loved one is part of a caring family, this community checks the right boxes.
Alternatives become worth considering for those whose priorities include deeper clinical capabilities, larger campuses, or a more polished corporate feel. Residents with substantial memory-care needs or complex medical conditions may require more intensive nursing coverage and formal protocols than a small, home-centered operation typically provides. A small minority of reviews express concerns about management or operations, signaling that expectations on organization and responsiveness can differ from person to person. In short, families should assess whether a smaller, intimate model aligns with the level of medical structure their loved one requires.
The strongest positives here drive a compelling case. The environment feels homey and safe, with staff who are genuinely compassionate and well-trained. The manager’s presence is consistently highlighted as a defining asset, responsive, respectful, and deeply committed to residents and the team. Cleanliness and organization are clear from common areas to resident rooms, and meals receive frequent praise for taste and variety. Activities are described as meaningful, helping residents stay engaged and connected. While a small clutch of reviews questions some operational aspects, the overall tone, driven by Katrina and the caregiving culture, suggests that everyday life is well-managed and consistently supportive.
Practical due diligence during visits will reveal how the strengths translate into day-to-day life. Prospective families should observe how residents interact with staff, sample a meal or two, and review the activity schedule to gauge vibrancy and cadence. Inquiries about staff-to-resident ratios, shift patterns, and the availability of memory-care supports as needs evolve are essential. A tour that features Katrina’s hands-on approach, time spent touring, returning calls, coordinating appointments, offers a window into how responsive communication feels for families. Verifying these elements during a visit helps ensure the lived experience aligns with the strong impressions voiced in reviews.
From a decision-making perspective, the value rests in emotional security and continuity. For families prioritizing a warm, low-stress transition, this community presents a meaningful level of comfort, clarity, and reliability in daily care and communication. The caveat lies in the potential for outlier dissatisfaction to reflect reality in rare cases; thus, the fit hinges on matching the resident’s desire for personal attention with the family’s tolerance for a smaller-scale operation. When the balance tilts toward a home-like atmosphere, dedicated staff, appealing meals, and engaging activities, the positives overwhelmingly offset the handful of negative voices.
Bottom line: So Close To Home serves best those seniors who crave a genuine home vibe, where staff become familiar faces, meals delight, and daily routines offer reassurance under compassionate leadership. It may not satisfy families seeking extensive clinical depth, a large, impression-heavy campus, or a rigid, highly standardized environment. The strong, consistent praise for leadership, care, and day-to-day life makes this a compelling option for households that value warmth, transparency, and a trusted manager guiding the care narrative. Prospective residents should schedule a thoughtful visit, engage Katrina in candid conversations about care plans, and verify alignment with medical needs and personal preferences before deciding.










Dementia, Paranoia, and Caregiver Guidance: Understanding the Connection
Engaging Memory Care Activities That Enhance Quality of Life
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community