2498 Bluestone Place, Green Bay, WI 54311
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Century Ridge Of Green Bay I Costs & Pricing
Century Ridge of Green Bay I offers its one-bedroom units at a competitive rate of $3,200 per month. This price is slightly above the average for Brown County, which sits at $3,094, but remains in line with the broader state average of $3,412 for similar accommodations. The facility provides a supportive living environment that prioritizes resident comfort and care, justifying its pricing within this context. Overall, residents can expect quality service and amenities that may enhance their living experience beyond what basic cost comparisons might suggest.
| Floor plans | Century Ridge Of Green Bay I | Brown County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $3,200 | $3,094 | $3,412 |
Overall Review of Century Ridge Of Green Bay I
Pros
The staff are very nice.- The quality of care is great and the value is excellent.
- They would recommend this community to other families.
- The food is scrumptious and the staff are awesome and friendly.
- The environment feels safe and comfortable for residents.
- The caregiving staff is wonderful, kind, cheerful, and helpful.
- The entire crew has been extremely helpful and respectful toward Mom and the family.
Cons
The administrator Jennifer hires criminals with dangerous backgrounds.- The staff do not seem to care when a family member asks for help or condolences after a loved one passes away.
- The caregiving staff is understaffed and not always fully trained; management is lacking.
- They do not deliver on promised activities, and the food was horrible.
- The facility kicked residents out without the required 30-day notice.
- They would rate the facility a zero if possible.
Review
Century Ridge of Green Bay I is best suited for seniors who want a small, home-like setting where attention feels personal and meals and social life are accessible without navigating a large campus. Families drawn to a low-key environment with a tighter-knit community, where residents can be treated more like individuals than numbers, will find value here. Those seeking robust clinical oversight, a bustling activities calendar, and highly standardized administrative processes may want to consider alternatives. The mix in reviews suggests this is not a one-size-fits-all option, but rather a choice that rewards the right priorities with meaningful, intimate care.
Positive signals abound for the right resident profile. Several reviewers praise the caregiving staff as kind, cheerful, and genuinely helpful, creating a warm atmosphere that can feel like a safe, supportive home. The setting’s smaller footprint, ten rooms across two ranch-style buildings, promotes visibility and accountability, allowing families to feel that their loved ones are getting more personalized attention. Food occasionally earns high marks, with residents describing meals as homemade and satisfying, and the social life includes holiday parties, live entertainment, and on-site gatherings that foster a sense of community without overwhelming residents. For families prioritizing value and a less crowded environment, those elements can translate into real peace of mind.
Yet the picture is not uniformly rosy. A recurrent thread points to staffing realities: caregivers are often described as caring and capable, but the workforce is perceived as undersized and not consistently trained. That combination can yield intermittent gaps in coverage, slower response times, or inconsistent execution of activities and routines. Management appears as a more contested ingredient in this mix: several reviews flag deficiencies in leadership, with one critique alleging troubling hiring practices and another noting that management “lacks” in the same areas where staff shine. These tensions matter deeply when needs shift from routine assistance to more complex or urgent care scenarios, and they warrant serious scrutiny before any move-in decision.
The most troubling experiences can offset otherwise strong positives. Instances cited by families, kicked-out notices without the standard 30-day transition period, reports of subpar food in some periods, and stretches with little to no activities despite promises, underline how quickly trust can fray when governance and program execution diverge from expectations. These episodes matter, particularly for residents who depend on predictable schedules, consistent nutrition, and a stable care plan. They also raise legitimate questions about the facility’s ability to honor resident rights and to communicate clearly when problems arise. While such incidents are not universal, their presence in multiple reviews signals a cautionary flag that cannot be ignored.
From a decision-maker’s standpoint, the pros and cons crystallize into a practical calculus. If a family values a small, intimate environment where staff camaraderie and a friendly, almost apartment-like vibe are paramount, Century Ridge can deliver resilience and comfort, provided staffing and management gaps are actively monitored and mitigated. The offsetting strengths, personal attention, meaningful social events, and good-value pricing, can outweigh the downsides for residents who do not require high-intensity medical oversight or a rigorously structured activity calendar. However, for anyone prioritizing rock-solid administration, consistent programming, and guaranteed rapid escalation of concerns, this community may fall short.
Alternatives should be considered for those with more demanding clinical needs or firmer expectations around governance. Larger, better-staffed communities with reputations for consistent programming and transparent management may offer greater peace of mind for families navigating complex care requirements. Before deciding, prospective families should conduct rigorous, in-person due diligence: ask about current staffing ratios, turnover, and training; review the activity calendar against actual delivery; request recent resident rights policies and move-out procedures; and speak directly with both frontline caregivers and the administrator to gauge responsiveness and alignment on care philosophy. A well-informed choice will hinge on confirming that the community’s strengths align with the resident’s needs, and that potential gaps are being actively addressed.
20 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Activities on-site
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services on-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Ground floor units
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Austin Straubel International (9 miles away)
24-hour call system
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Hospice waiver
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Catholic services
Day trips and outings
Happy hour
Live dance or theater performances
Live musical performances
Live well programs
Wii bowling
Understanding Dementia Behaviors: Practical Insights and Strategies for Caregivers
When Dementia Sparks Anger and Aggression: Understanding the Connection and Ways to Cope
Dementia Behaviors: In-Depth Understanding and Effective Coping Strategies