Rost-Huebner House in Crivitz, WI

Cons

• The place is not suitable for an adult in need.
• The staff is undertrained.
• There is drug use on the premises.
• The bathroom floors are deteriorating to the point of posing a hazard.

Review

Rost-Huebner House in Crivitz is not a fit for any resident who requires daily care. The lone review available paints a blunt, unacceptable picture: staff described as undertrained, a rumor of drug use, and bathroom floors so deteriorated that a homeowner or resident could literally put a foot through them. In practical terms, this is a facility whose core caregiving function appears unreliable, and whose physical plant presents ongoing safety hazards. For families seeking dependable assisted living with consistent supervision, this community does not meet the baseline expectations essential to safeguarding vulnerable adults.

Who may want to consider alternatives? Those who truly do not need any hands-on assistance may technically navigate a setting like this, but even that narrow possibility is fraught with risk. For anyone evaluating care for a loved one who requires reminders for medications, help with transfers, or monitoring for symptoms of chronic illness, this option should be immediately deprioritized. Families should focus on communities with clearly documented staff qualifications, reliable supervision, and a history of safe, well-maintained environments. Even independent seniors should proceed with extreme caution, given the reported safety hazards that could complicate even routine daily activities.

In terms of balancing positives and negatives, there are no evident pros in the cited account that could offset the main concerns. The review highlights a combination of undertrained staff, alleged drug use, and deteriorating bathroom floors, each factor undermining safety, dignity, and quality of life. Without verifiable strengths such as competent caregiving, consistent medication management, or a well-maintained physical plant, any potential upside (short-term cost savings, convenience, or location) is effectively nullified. The absence of corroborating positive feedback or improvements in the facility’s operations means the cons decisively dominate the decision calculus.

From a decision-making perspective, concrete steps should govern any further consideration. Prospective residents or their families should demand current licensing verification and a transparent outline of caregiver qualifications, training schedules, and on-site coverage hours. Request recent state inspection reports, incident and complaint histories, and occupancy-related disclosures. Insist on viewing up-to-date maintenance records, including the condition of flooring and bathroom fixtures, with a clear plan and timeline for any needed repairs. Schedule conversations with prospective administrators and direct care staff at different times to gauge consistency in service levels, and, if possible, speak with current residents about daily routines and safety responsiveness.

Alternatives deserve scrutiny that aligns with safety, reliability, and person-centered care. Look for facilities with visible, well-staffed operations: clearly licensed administrators, certified nursing staff on site, adequate caregiver-to-resident ratios, and active, well-documented quality assurance processes. Seek communities with modern, safe infrastructure, including maintenance protocols that prevent familiar hazards and robust safety features (non-slip surfaces, grab bars, accessible design). Programs should demonstrate meaningful engagement, predictable daily schedules, and transparent communication with families. In short, prioritize facilities that can prove consistent, compassionate care and a safe environment through objective evidence, not promises.

The bottom line is straightforward: Rost-Huebner House does not meet the needs of most seniors seeking assisted living. The combination of undertrained staff, alleged drug activity, and structurally unsafe conditions dramatically increases risk and undermines trust. For families prioritizing safety, reliability, and dignity, this community should be crossed off the shortlist in favor of proven options with verifiable staffing, proactive maintenance, and a track record of positive resident experiences. The prudent move is to explore other local communities that demonstrate clear commitment to care standards, transparent operations, and a safe, welcoming living environment.

Restaurants

• Sky Harbor 2-Go (1.4 miles)
• Subway (1.5 miles)
• Newinghams Supper Club (2 miles)
• The Gateway Bar & Grill (2.2 miles)
• HomeTown Buffet (2.2 miles)
• Skip's Place (3.8 miles)
• Beaver Saloon & Eatery (4.6 miles)

Places of Worship

• Trinity Assembly of God Church (1.6 miles)
• St Mary Catholic Church (2 miles)
• Wels (2.1 miles)
• Grace Ev Lutheran Church Wels (2.1 miles)
• St Mary Parish (2.1 miles)
• Faith Presbyterian Church (2.1 miles)
• First Baptist Church (4.6 miles)

Parks

• Littleland Community Playground (2 miles)
• Veterans Park Crivitz (2 miles)
• Lake Noquebay Park (5.9 miles)
• High Falls Park (10.2 miles)
• Veterans Memorial Park (10.6 miles)
• Badger Park (16.2 miles)
• Holt Park (16.4 miles)

Pharmacies

• Crivitz Pharmacy (2 miles)
• Village Pharmacy (8.9 miles)
• Peshtigo Pharmacy-Valu-Rite (16.5 miles)
• Peshtigo Pharmacy (16.5 miles)
• Home Town Pharmacy (17.5 miles)

Transportation

• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (2 miles)
• First 141 Railroad (15.4 miles)
• Big Woods Taxidermy (17.5 miles)
• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (18.6 miles)

Cafes

• Charlie's Island Cafe (2.2 miles)
• Sportsman's Cafe (10.4 miles)

Physicians

• CMH Primary Care Clinic (17.6 miles)
• John P Briody (18.8 miles)
• Aurora Occupational Health (19.1 miles)
• Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic (19.1 miles)