115 Marrs Street, Chippewa Falls, WI 54729
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Our House Senior Living - Chippewa Falls Memory Care Costs & Pricing
Our House Senior Living - Chippewa Falls Memory Care offers competitive pricing for its memory care services compared to both Eau Claire County and the broader state of Wisconsin. For a studio apartment, the monthly cost stands at $3,475, which is notably lower than the county average of $4,023 and slightly above the state average of $3,999. In terms of one-bedroom accommodations, Our House charges $3,575, which remains affordable when compared to Eau Claire County's rate of $3,715 and is higher than the statewide average of $3,412. Overall, these costs reflect a commitment to providing quality care while remaining mindful of affordability within the local market.
| Floor plans | Our House Senior Living - Chippewa Falls Memory Care | Eau Claire County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $3,475 | $4,023 | $3,999 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,575 | $3,715 | $3,412 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$375 / mo
Azura Memory Care of Eau Claire
$3,850 / month11.9 miles away -
from -$475 / mo
Our House Senior Living - Chippewa Falls Assisted Care
$3,000 to $3,980 / month0.0 miles away -
from +$665 / mo
Our House Senior Living - Eau Claire Memory Care
$4,140 / month12.6 miles away -
from +$225 / mo
Family Tree
$3,700 to $4,200 / month11.1 miles away
Overall Review of Our House Senior Living - Chippewa Falls Memory Care
Pros
The staff are consistently warm and offer guests drinks and snacks.- Visitors enjoy volunteering and participating in activities with the residents.
- Visitors look forward to the facility reopening so they can visit again.
- Residents are seen sitting outside and chatting in the summer, and they warmly welcome others to join the conversation.
- The staff are pleasant and invite guests to share snacks and beverages.
- The staff are compassionate and communicate well with residents and their families; residents adjust well and enjoy their apartments and activities.
- Our House keeps things as close to normal as possible during lockdown, and families appreciate their efforts.
Cons
The Resident Director did not return multiple phone calls or e-mails from the placing agency, and the messages seemed to fall on deaf ears.- Leadership was described as very unprofessional.
- The locale was not appealing due to traffic.
- The dining area was crowded.
Review
This memory-care community is best suited for families seeking a warm, connection-driven environment where residents with memory impairment are treated like part of a close-knit, home-like community. It works well for seniors who thrive on daily social interaction, purposeful activities, and staff who invest time in building relationships with both residents and their families. The culture here emphasizes hospitality, with a vibe that feels welcoming to newcomers and reassuring to relatives who want to stay closely involved in care planning and daily routines.
The strongest positives are the tangible, day-to-day strengths: a staff that comes across as compassionate and consistently able to engage residents in meaningful activities, a resident community that openly welcomes new members, and an atmosphere that resembles a welcoming home more than a clinical facility. Residents are frequently seen chatting outdoors in warm weather, signaling the value placed on social connectedness. Families report that staff are approachable, communicative, and eager to include them in meals and events, which can ease the stress of transitions and ongoing caregiving. The sleeping rooms and common areas often look neat and inviting, and the dining area is described as clean and pleasant, reinforcing a sense of normalcy and comfort.
However, there are clear drawbacks that a family must weigh. Several reviews flag leadership responsiveness as a concern, with instances of the Resident Director not returning calls or emails in a timely way. That kind of leadership friction can complicate care coordination, assessments, and problem solving for a resident’s evolving needs. Another practical negative noted by some reviewers is the locale: while pleasant in many respects, the surrounding traffic and walking conditions may make outdoor activities less appealing for some residents who crave simplicity and safety on foot. A crowded dining area in at least one account can also detract from mealtime comfort, and while the food is described as acceptable, it is not universally praised as exceptional.
These pros and cons must be weighed against each other. The warmth of staff, the emphasis on social activity, and the home-like environment do a strong job of offsetting the occasional administrative lag and the less ideal locale. For memory-care residents who value consistent human connections, predictable daily programming, and a facility where staff seem to genuinely enjoy their work and care for residents as family, the positives often outweigh the imperfect leadership touchpoints. The social warmth and resident-to-resident engagement can significantly reduce anxiety and confusion for individuals living with memory challenges, making daily life smoother despite administrative quirks.
Alternatives become appealing for families who prioritize rock-solid, highly responsive leadership and a more walk-friendly setting, or who want a dining room with consistently ample space and a quieter environment during meals. If ongoing concern about leadership responsiveness is paramount, it’s prudent to compare administrative communication patterns, response times, and availability across nearby memory-care options. For residents who require a more serene or less densely trafficked neighborhood, or whose families place a premium on streamlined mealtime flow, exploring other facilities with a different layout or location could be worthwhile.
In the end, this community serves a practical, family-centered model of memory care: strong social programming, a genuinely welcoming staff, and a homey atmosphere that supports meaningful interaction. It is a compelling choice for families who can tolerate occasional leadership gaps and a few locale-related drawbacks in exchange for a warm, engaged environment where residents are seen, heard, and included. The recommended next steps are straightforward: arrange a visit with direct conversations to gauge leadership responsiveness, request a current schedule of activities and dining arrangements, and observe meal times and common areas for traffic flow and comfort. This approach will reveal whether the balance of pros aligns with the resident’s needs and the family’s expectations.
24 resident community capacity
Studio apartments
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities off-site
Bath tubs
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Financial aid
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Kitchenette
Laundry
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Resident parking
Respite or short term stays offered
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Chippewa Valley Regional (8 miles away)
24-hour call system
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Arts and crafts
BBQs or picnics
Birthday parties
Cooking club
Educational speakers / life long learning
Fitness programs
Games
Happy hour
Live dance or theater performances
Live musical performances
English
Comprehensive Guide to VA Nursing Homes: A Crucial Long-Term Care Resource for Veterans
Estimating the Expenses of At-Home Dementia Care: A Detailed Exploration
Comprehensive Insights on the Late Stages of Dementia: What to Expect and How to Provide Care