Cogir at The Quarry Costs & Pricing
Cogir at The Quarry offers competitive pricing for its residential accommodations, particularly when compared to broader market rates in Clark County and the state of Washington. For instance, the monthly cost for a studio unit at Cogir is $2,995, significantly lower than the average costs of $3,882 in Clark County and $4,126 statewide. Similarly, one-bedroom apartments at Cogir are priced at $3,795, which is more economical than both the county and state averages of $4,178 and $4,632 respectively. However, it's noteworthy that the semi-private rooms are priced higher at $4,975 compared to Clark County's average of $3,897; yet they remain competitive against Washington's average of $4,267. Lastly, two-bedroom units come in at $5,725 - slightly higher than Clark County's average but favorable compared to the lower state rate of $4,301. Overall, Cogir at The Quarry presents a balanced mix of affordability and quality within the local senior living landscape.
| Floor plans | Cogir at The Quarry | Clark County | Washington |
|---|
| Studio | $2,995 | $3,882 | $4,128 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,795 | $4,178 | $4,634 |
| Semi-Private | $4,975 | $3,897 | $4,272 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $5,725 | $4,528 | $4,301 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$495 / mo
A Gentle Care Home
$2,500 / month
10.8 miles away
-
from +$505 / mo
American Living Adult Family Home LLC
$3,500 / month
3.4 miles away
-
About the same
Elder Garden Care Home, LLC
$3,000 / month
6.9 miles away
-
from +$505 / mo
Northwest Home Health
$3,500 to $3,700 / month
11.4 miles away
-
About the same
Rivercrest Adult Care
$3,000 to $3,700 / month
20.1 miles away
Overall Review of Cogir at The Quarry
differentiator
10 reviews mention this
Food quality is a big draw
Restaurant-style dining and attentive wait staff stand out in reviews.
Residents and families repeatedly mention the food as a highlight, including âamazingâ meals and praise for specific dining experiences. Several reviews also call out variety for events and holiday meals, along with good service in the dining room. The community offers restaurant-style dining, room service, and special dining programs, which lines up with the way residents describe dining as more than basic cafeteria service.
common
11 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Many reviews mention a full calendar of activities.
A lot of reviewers say there are plenty of activities to help residents stay engaged and meet others. Some families describe their loved ones as happy and actively involved, while others mention specific kinds of programming they enjoyed. The community offers a broad set of activities, including live well programs, educational speakers, devotional services, wine tasting, and day trips.
common
18 reviews mention this
Staff warmth shows up often
Residents and families frequently describe the staff as caring and attentive.
Across reviews, families often talk about staff friendliness, responsiveness, and feeling supportedâespecially during transitions into the community. Even with some mixed experiences, many reviewers still describe the overall team as kind and helpful. The community also provides medication management plus incontinence and diabetic care services, which supports why families focus on staff attention when it comes to daily needs.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Care communication can fall short
Multiple reviews raise concerns about care follow-through and communication.
Some families describe problems after moving into higher-need care, including laundry mix-ups, housekeeping gaps, and difficulty getting timely attention. Several reviews also mention communication challenges with care planning and updates, including worries about how therapy and other care needs were handled. While the community lists diabetic, incontinence, and medication management support, residents describe inconsistent day-to-day coordination in memory-care situations.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Parkinsonâs support feels uneven
Residents mention a Parkinsonâs-focused offering, but not everyone felt it matched needs.
At least a couple of reviews reference a Parkinsonâs specialty, but one family specifically felt the support wasnât knowledgeable enough for advanced symptoms beyond general exercise and a support group. In that same account, the residentâs care plan and follow-through were described as slow to appear and uneven as needs increased. This doesnât align with residents who felt strongly about cleanliness and caregiver kindness elsewhere, so it appears most relevant for higher-acuity Parkinsonâs situations.
caveat
3 reviews mention this
Cost feels high for some families
Some reviewers say the pricing and experience didnât match expectations.
A few reviews explicitly call the community too expensive or frame the experience as being âall about the money.â One review also describes concerns about service levels and fees as needs increased. Even though the published price range can be benchmarked below county and state averages, the reviews show that value perception depends heavily on care follow-through and day-to-day support.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.