Information last verified:
6415 6th Avenue, Tacoma, WA 98406
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
This community is best suited for crisis-stabilization under tight external oversight, not for long-term placement. In practical terms, Kleiner Group Home reads as a setting that might appeal only to families with no viable alternatives at the moment and who are prepared to supervise care decisions closely. The recent accounts describe safety and rights concerns that undermine trust in routine care, not merely in isolated incidents. Without demonstrable, consistent safeguards, predictable caregiver responses, or transparent processes, residents face a real risk of unsafe handling and poor judgment. This is not a sustainable or appropriate option for anyone who needs steady, respectful, legally compliant support.
Those facing a choice should explicitly consider alternatives. Families prioritizing safety, autonomy, and lawful treatment of adults with special needs should look elsewhere. If the resident has medical complexity, behavioral differences, or a need for coordinated oversight with clinicians and protective services, a more regulated facility is essential. The reported actions, police involvement, abrupt hospital transfers, and concerns about rights violations, signal an environment where oversight is inconsistent. In short, options with licensed operations, clear governance, and guardianship-friendly procedures are strongly warranted whenever possible.
On balance, the few apparent positives are outweighed by the core failings. Any mention of activities or seasonal events does little to compensate for the risk factors present in daily care. The main red flags, unreliable crisis responses, an abrupt termination of services via email, alleged theft, physical contact, and attempts to involuntarily commit a resident without family notification, constitute serious safety and rights violations. When such fundamental issues arise, any superficial advantage related to programming or social events quickly loses relevance. In practical terms, safety and legal protections take precedence over momentary engagement.
Evaluating viable alternatives requires a disciplined, criteria-driven approach. Seek facilities that are fully licensed and regulated, with transparent staff qualifications, stable staffing ratios, and documented, supervisor-approved crisis protocols. Prioritize settings that provide clear incident reporting, proactive family communication, and explicit policies governing hospital transfers, consent, and involvement of protective services. Look for independent reviews or regulatory citations that corroborate strong safety records. During visits, assess resident dignity, staff responsiveness, and whether the environment feels orderly and supportive rather than reactive or punitive.
Action steps for families are concrete and urgent. If choosing to explore, arrange an independent care assessment from a licensed social worker or care manager and request the most recent licensing inspection results, including corrective action plans. Develop a transition plan with realistic timelines and clear hospital/medical coordination to prevent ad hoc, facility-driven decisions. Ensure transportation and logistics are secured by the guardian or family, not left to the facility, and insist on written policies detailing steps in emergencies and rights protections. Begin the search for alternatives promptly, prioritizing environments with proven safety, compassion, and continuity of care.
Bottom line: the cons here substantially outweigh any potential benefit. For families seeking reliable, respectful, rights-protective care, this community should be a last resort. Safer, more stable options exist, facilities with verified licensing, consistent staffing, stringent safety protocols, and a culture of transparent, collaborative care. A decision anchored in safety, predictability, and long-term well-being will steer families toward those alternatives that align with high standards of care for adults with special needs.
Located in Tacoma, Washington, this small group home offers a comfortable and supportive environment for individuals in need of board and care services. The home provides fully furnished accommodations, with amenities including a dining room, outdoor space, and access to Wi-Fi/high-speed internet.
Residents can expect personalized assistance with activities of daily living, such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. The staff is experienced in coordinating with health care providers to ensure comprehensive care for each individual's unique needs. Medication management is also provided to promote the well-being of residents.
The dining experience at this group home is tailored to accommodate special dietary restrictions, including diabetes diets. Nutritious meals are prepared and served by the staff, allowing residents to enjoy delicious food without worry.
Engaging activities are scheduled daily to encourage socialization and mental stimulation among residents. Additionally, the community benefits from its proximity to various amenities in the surrounding area. With six cafes, eight parks, 17 pharmacies, 39 physicians' offices, 17 restaurants, one place of worship nearby as well as theaters and hospitals within close distance.
Overall, this assisted living community offers a nurturing environment where individuals can receive personalized care while enjoying a range of amenities and conveniences nearby.
Kleiner Group Home is located at 6415 6th Avenue, Tacoma, WA 98406 in Pierce County, Washington
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Choosing between assisted living and nursing homes involves evaluating emotional and financial factors, with assisted living offering independence and support for daily activities at a lower cost, while nursing homes provide intensive medical care for individuals with significant health needs. The decision is influenced by personal preferences, health status, cognitive function, and varying Medicaid coverage across states.
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Assisted living in 2025 offers a crucial balance of independence and support for seniors, with costs varying from $2,500 to over $7,000 per month based on factors such as location and care level. Understanding pricing complexities, including regional differences and potential hidden fees, is essential for families to plan financially while ensuring quality care for their loved ones.
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
The guide outlines the complexities of Medicaid coverage for assisted living, highlighting significant state-to-state variations, limited coverage often restricted to personal care services, and the existence of specialized waivers for certain needs like memory care. It advises families to consult local Medicaid offices for options while emphasizing the importance of understanding state-specific regulations and facility policies.