Golden Ages

Pros

• Lynette did an amazing job with her and her staff, and made the final years of my mother-in-law's life very good.
• They did an awesome job taking care of her from beginning to end, and they're definitely good people.
• Lynette has stayed in touch with my wife off and on.
• They truly care.
• Lynette the owner/operator/caregiver, gives outstanding care and direction to her caregivers who are under her employment.
• Everyone is respectful of each other and they provide a loving atmosphere.
• The owner provides a safe and caring environment for her 4 residents.
• My sister-in-law enjoys the daily living and social activities with the other residents and the caregivers.

Cons

• Lynette is described as the epitome of a power trip, demanding all the attention and threatening to ban visitors who don't comply.
• The reviewer states they would not keep their dog there and would not feel good about it.
• They claim they have witnessed abuse and verbal abuse toward residents.
• They say they reported the situation to Adult Protective Services and hired a lawyer to help their mother.
• They allege that Jennifer Wick is their niece and that negative actions toward her mother led to State Ombudsman involvement and a ban on visits to the property.

Review

A look across the various online impressions of Golden Age Adult Family Home reveals a striking split in how people describe life there. For some families, the home feels like a safe, with-it place where a caring owner and her team create a sense of family and continuity for residents who need daily support. The stories emphasize years of devoted care, moments of personal connection, and a belief that the people running the home do their best to look after residents and their loved ones. In these accounts, Lynette is portrayed as the central figure - hands-on, involved, and deeply invested in making sure both residents and their families are well taken care of. The caregivers are described as a consistent and respectful team, and the overall atmosphere is presented as loving and familial.

Several reviewers recount long-term stays for their relatives, where the experience went beyond routine caregiving to feel like home. One family member notes that their mother-in-law lived there for several years and that Lynette and her staff did an amazing job from beginning to end, treating the elder with care and dignity. They describe ongoing personal outreach, including keeping in touch with the family after the elder's death and continuing to offer support through hospice care. The sentiment across these stories is that the caregivers not only delivered practical care but also offered emotional warmth, often building a sense of community among residents that felt almost like a second family. These accounts highlight small details - staff stepping in to manage needs, coordinating with family members, and maintaining a cooperative spirit with relatives - that paint the home as a nurturing environment.

Another thread comes from a person who holds power of attorney for a wife residing at Golden Age. This perspective emphasizes the quality of care and the professionalism of Lynette as owner, operator, and caregiver. According to this account, Lynette provides outstanding direction to her staff, and residents are treated with respect in a loving atmosphere. The commenter asserts that there is no physical or verbal abuse at any time, and that the resident enjoys close relationships with both other residents and caregivers. They describe frequent visits with the wife - three days a week - and portray the home as a place where input from the family is welcomed and where the daily life of residents is supported with care and attention. In this narrative, the home is framed as a stable, safe environment where the elder's well-being is the priority.

The discussion is complicated, however, by a rebuttal from another family member who insists that a widely seen post by Jennifer Wick is not accurate. This commenter, who also appears to be a relative, argues that as the power of attorney for their wife, who has been a resident for about 1.5 years, they have witnessed a different reality. They claim that Lynette runs the home with care and positive energy, and that there has never been any abuse. They emphasize the respectful atmosphere among staff and residents and assert that the wife enjoys her daily life and social activities, with the family visiting regularly. This account also mentions that a State Ombudsman was involved in a separate, personal dispute connected to Jennifer Wick, and that Jennifer Wick was no longer allowed to visit the resident on the property. The implication here is that the disputed review may stem from family tensions and personal conflicts rather than the day-to-day care reported by others.

A starkly different voice adds yet more complexity to the overall picture. This reviewer presents Lynette as someone who exercises power in a way that feels controlling or intimidating, calling it a "power trip." They claim that visits can be policed to the point where family members fear being banned from seeing their loved ones. Allegations of abuse - both verbal and physical - are raised, with the reviewer stating they reported concerns to Adult Protective Services and asserting that they even hired a lawyer to help secure their relative's safety and freedom from the alleged mistreatment. The language is urgent and charged, and the reviewer offers themselves as a resource for others who might be weighing the decision to place a loved one in the home, signaling a strong belief that the facility should be avoided and possibly shut down.

Taken together, these reviews illustrate a community divided by personal experiences and expectations. For some families, the home is a cherished place where a dedicated owner and a compassionate caregiver team deliver long-term, high-quality care that feels like family support built around the resident's needs. For others, a different set of experiences - rooted in concerns about management style, visitor access, and potential neglect or mistreatment - creates lasting mistrust and fear. The presence of formal actions, such as involvement by a State Ombudsman in one side of the discussion and the explicit claims of protective agency involvement in another, underscores the seriousness with which these concerns are treated by some families.

What emerges is a reminder of how varied care experiences can be in a small, home-like setting. Personal chemistry with staff, the perceived attentiveness of the owner, the day-to-day routines, and the transparency of communication with families all seem to color how each resident and family member experiences life at Golden Age. When evaluating such a home, readers are left weighing stories of extraordinary compassion and stability against accounts of power dynamics and conflict. The divergent narratives suggest that prospective families should undertake thorough, multi-faceted due diligence: visit in person, speak with multiple staff members and residents, review official inspections or complaints, and consider how the home handles visits, safety protocols, and dispute resolution. In the end, these reviews offer a mosaic of experiences rather than a single, uniform picture - one that invites careful consideration and direct inquiry from anyone considering Golden Age for a loved one.

This part of Tacoma, Washington offers convenient access to a variety of amenities and services that may be appealing to seniors considering the area for living. With several pharmacies, physicians, and hospitals located within a short distance, residents can easily access healthcare services when needed. Additionally, there are numerous cafes and restaurants nearby for dining options, as well as parks for recreational activities such as Kandle Park and Point Defiance Park. Places of worship like Christ Episcopal Church provide opportunities for spiritual fulfillment, while the Grand Cinema offers entertainment options for cultural enrichment. Overall, this neighborhood in Tacoma provides a well-rounded community with essential resources for senior living.

Pharmacies

• Rite Aid (0.5 miles)
• Walgreens (0.8 miles)
• Bartell Drugs (1.3 miles)
• Walgreens (1.5 miles)
• Pharmacy Compounding Solutions (1.7 miles)
• Good Neighbor Pharmacy (1.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.1 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (0.7 miles)
• Starbucks (3.2 miles)
• Starbucks (3.6 miles)
• Panera Bread (3.7 miles)
• Alfred's Cafe (4.1 miles)
• Panera Bread (4.2 miles)
• Starbucks (5.6 miles)

Parks

• Kandle Park (0.7 miles)
• Titlow Park (2.1 miles)
• Dune Peninsula at Point Defiance Park (2.9 miles)
• Point Defiance Park (3.1 miles)
• Sheridan Park (3.2 miles)
• Five Mile Drive (3.6 miles)
• Conservation Park (4.1 miles)

Physicians

• Northend Optical (0.9 miles)
• Eye MDs of Puget Sound (1.2 miles)
• Anesis Spine and Pain Care (1.3 miles)
• Carol Milgard Breast Center - Tacoma, WA (1.3 miles)
• University Place Pediatrics (1.4 miles)
• Tacoma Oral Surgery & Implants (1.6 miles)
• Northwest Family & Spinal Clinic (1.7 miles)

Restaurants

• Peaks and Pints (1.4 miles)
• Ale House Pub & Eatery (1.5 miles)
• Dirty Oscar's Annex (2.1 miles)
• The Beach Tavern At Titlow (2.1 miles)
• Boathouse 19 (2.3 miles)
• Frisko Freeze (2.6 miles)
• McDonald's (3.1 miles)

Hospitals

• MultiCare (1.8 miles)
• Group Health Cooperative (2.8 miles)
• MultiCare Regional Cancer Center - Tacoma (2.8 miles)
• Gig Harbor Ambulatory Surg Center (5.2 miles)

Places of Worship

• Christ Episcopal Church (2.7 miles)

Theaters

• Grand Cinema (3.1 miles)