13046 30th Ave. NE, Seattle, WA 98125
To contact a resident: (206) 786-9125
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Home Sweet Home Care II Costs & Pricing
Home Sweet Home Care II offers competitive pricing for its residential care services, making it an appealing choice in the context of King County and the broader Washington state. For semi-private accommodations, Home Sweet Home Care II charges $4,000 per month, which is notably lower than both the county average of $4,430 and the state average of $4,267. Similarly, their private room rate of $4,500 also positions them favorably against King County's average of $5,034 and Washington's average of $4,772. This pricing strategy reflects a commitment to providing quality care while remaining accessible to families seeking affordable options in a challenging economic landscape.
| Floor plans | Home Sweet Home Care II | King County | Washington |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $4,000 | $4,430 | $4,272 |
| Private | $4,500 | $5,034 | $4,774 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Home Sweet Home Care II
Pros
The care provided to Gloria was compassionate and attentive.
Taye greeted Gloria at move-in and remained with the family before and after her passing.
Margeret and Penny provided amazing care for Gloria.
Gloria was kept clean, and the meals were amazing.
A family member would never regret living at this home.
The reviewers highly recommend this home for care, family, and love.
Cons
None. The review is entirely positive in its portrayal of care and staff.
Review
Home Sweet Home Care II in Seattle is best suited for families that prize a tightly woven, home-like care experience where caregivers become fixtures in daily life and form lasting, personal connections with both residents and their families. The standout testimonial centers on a mom named Gloria, with staff who greeted her on move-in, stood beside the family through her illness, and remained present in the days after her passing. The narrative highlights Taye’s welcome, Margeret’s and Penny’s steady hands, and a rhythm of care that keeps residents clean, well-fed, and treated with genuine warmth. For families that want a setting that feels like a careful extension of home, reinforced by consistent kindness and tangible affection, this community checks many boxes.
Those weighing alternatives should consider how much emphasis is placed on medical intensity, structured programming, and professional nursing presence. The single review does not address more formal clinical capabilities, rehab services, or memory-care specifics, which can be decisive for residents with complex medical needs or dementia requiring specialized routines. Prospective families with expectations of robust on-site medical oversight, routine therapy, or highly regimented schedules may want to compare with larger, more clinically oriented communities. In short, when the priority shifts toward institutional-scale medical resources, this home-like model may not fully align.
The major strengths are clear and compelling: a personal, almost family-infused approach to daily care, palpable staff investment, and a culture that treats care as a collaborative, loving endeavor. The care team’s willingness to engage beyond the typical duties, supporting the family before and after a loved one’s passing, speaks to a level of empathy that is rare to find in larger settings. Cleanliness and food quality emerge as practical, everyday markers of respect for residents, reinforcing a sense that life remains dignified and enjoyable even as needs evolve. These elements create an emotional safety net that can ease transitions for anxious families and residents alike.
Where the reasoning tightens is in the absence of documented breadth. A single testimonial can illuminate extraordinary moments, but it does not confirm consistency across shifts, weekends, or different staff personalities. The lack of reported clinical details leaves questions about how the home handles increasingly complex med regimens, emergency response, or care coordination with outside providers. Still, the review’s emphasis on love, family, and care suggests that, for residents who thrive on intimate attention and a predictable, affectionate routine, the offset of potential gaps in medical depth may be substantial. The risk, then, is that expectations around medical capabilities are unmet if needs escalate.
Practical next steps for families are clear: perform a first-hand visit focused on the day-to-day vibe, how staff interact with residents, the pace of meals, and the tone of conversations around caregiving. Inquire specifically about staffing patterns, how caregiver roles are assigned, and what nursing support looks like on evenings and weekends. Ask about trial stays or transition support, and request opportunities to speak with other families about their experiences. Confirm licensing, safety protocols, and the availability of additional services as needs evolve, so the fit can be judged not only in moments of praise but across a broader trajectory of care.
Bottom line: Home Sweet Home Care II stands out for residents and families who value a warm, intimate, and emotionally engaged approach to daily living. The care conveyed in the testimonial, marked by hospitality, attentiveness, cleanliness, and excellent meals, paints a compelling portrait of a setting where a loved one can feel cherished. However, for anyone whose priority is intensive clinical oversight, rehab services, or specialized memory-care programming, exploring additional options is prudent. When the goal is to preserve dignity, warmth, and a sense of family, this Seattle home offers a powerful, distinctive fit that should be seriously considered.















Comprehensive Guide to Blood Pressure Charts for Older Adults: Understanding Normal and High Readings by Age
Financing Long-Term Nursing Home Care Through Social Security: A Thorough Exploration
Essential Knowledge on Pneumonia in Older Adults