Absolute Homecare Services

Cons

• The review claims the agency has the worst caregivers.
• The review claims caregivers do not provide the services advertised.
• The review claims caregivers do not clean up after the client or assist with daily needs and sleep most of the day.
• The review claims caregivers display attitudes toward elderly clients who are already in a fragile state.
• The review claims complaints to management lead to the caregiver being told and then coming to work worse to confront the client.
• The review claims dismissed caregivers are allowed to return to confront the client about being dismissed.
• The review claims the agency does not care about client safety and only wants to get paid, with no follow-up and belief in caregivers' untruths.

Review

Across multiple accounts, a troubling pattern emerges about this home care agency. Families describe promises and advertisements that starkly contrast with the care actually delivered. The overarching impression is that the agency fails to provide the basic level of support that it touts, leaving clients and their loved ones feeling abandoned and underserved. The recurring theme is not just occasional lapses but a pervasive neglect of duties that are essential to daily living and well-being.

At the heart of the complaints is a consistent failure to deliver the services that are advertised. Caregivers are supposed to assist with daily needs and keep a home environment clean, yet reviewers report that these essential tasks are routinely left undone. Basic responsibilities such as helping with personal care, tidying living spaces, and ensuring a safe, comfortable routine for the client are described as neglected. In some cases, caregivers reportedly spend most of their time sleeping rather than attending to the client's needs, undermining the purpose of having support in the first place and leaving the client more vulnerable by the day.

In addition to neglect, the character and quality of the caregivers themselves are called into question. Reviewers describe workers who appear untrained and ill-equipped to handle the responsibilities of elderly care. The tone and demeanor toward the elderly clients are criticized, with comments about how some caregivers treat individuals who are already fragile. The described attitudes contribute to an atmosphere of disrespect and fear rather than care and reassurance, making what should be a comforting arrangement feel more like an ongoing source of stress for both clients and families.

The relationship between families and management is portrayed as fragile and counterproductive. When complaints are raised, the response from management seems to be to relay those concerns directly to the caregiver, which often worsens the situation. The reviewer notes that the caregiver returns to work with a heightened confrontational stance toward the client after such discussions, creating a cycle of tension and mistrust. There is also a troubling practice described where, if a new caregiver is assigned and then dismissed, the agency allows the old caregiver to return to the home to confront the client about the dismissal. This dynamic suggests a lack of accountability and a disturbing pattern of retaliation rather than resolution.

Safety concerns are a dominant thread in these narratives. The reviewers insist that the agency does not prioritize safety, and they accuse it of being motivated primarily by payment rather than the well-being of the client. There is a pervasive sense that financial gain is placed above the actual needs of the client, with little to no follow-up after visits. The agency is described as taking the caregivers' word at face value, even when those accounts may be untruthful, which erodes trust and increases risk for vulnerable clients who rely on oversight and verification.

Taken together, these experiences paint a bleak picture of a system that appears to lack effective training, supervision, and accountability. The combination of unfulfilled promises, inadequate care, disrespectful attitudes, retaliatory management practices, and a perceived prioritization of payment over safety creates an environment that is not only unsatisfactory but potentially dangerous for elderly clients. Families feel left to navigate a confusing and unresponsive structure, where concerns are dismissed or magnified by those entrusted with guardianship of their loved ones.

Ultimately, the narratives convey a deep frustration with how this agency is functioning and how it treats the people who depend on it most. The repeated failures - both in the quality of care and in the responsiveness of leadership - leave families questioning the reliability and integrity of the service. The result is a persistent sense of distrust, anxiety about daily routines, and a longing for a system that honors safety, dignity, and the actual needs of elderly clients rather than prioritizing appearances or profits.

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.1 miles)
• Walgreens (2.7 miles)
• Wegmans (2.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.8 miles)
• Walgreens (3.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4.4 miles)
• Walgreens (4.8 miles)

Restaurants

• Taco Bell (0.2 miles)
• Wendy's (0.4 miles)
• McDonald's (0.4 miles)
• IHOP (2.6 miles)
• McDonald's (2.7 miles)
• Burger King (3.5 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (3.5 miles)

Hospitals

• Fort Belvoir Community Hospital (1.8 miles)
• Inova Mount Vernon Hospital Emergency Room (2.5 miles)
• Inova Mount Vernon Hospital (2.6 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (2.2 miles)
• Panera Bread (3.5 miles)
• Starbucks (5.7 miles)
• For Five Coffee (6.5 miles)
• Mae's Market and Cafe (6.7 miles)
• Starbucks (6.9 miles)
• Junction Bakery & Bistro (7.4 miles)

Physicians

• Diagnostic Radiology (2.4 miles)
• Patient First - Alexandria (4.5 miles)
• Telegraph Corner Family Medicine (5.1 miles)
• Mount Vernon Medical Group (5.3 miles)
• Williamsburg Square Family Practice (5.3 miles)

Parks

• Fort Hunt Park (3.7 miles)
• Springfield Forest Park (4.2 miles)
• The Play Ground (6.5 miles)
• Waterfront Park (7 miles)
• Lake Accotink Park (7.2 miles)
• Huntley Meadows Park (7.6 miles)

Transportation

• Franconia-Springfield Metro Station (4 miles)
• Van Dorn Street Metro Station (5.3 miles)
• Eisenhower Avenue Metro Station (5.9 miles)
• Amtrak (6.5 miles)
• King Street - Old Town Metro Station (6.5 miles)
• Braddock Road Metro Station (7.2 miles)

Places of Worship

• Pohick Church (4.2 miles)
• Saint Bernadette C (5.9 miles)
• St Marys Catholic Church (8.2 miles)

Theaters

• Regal Springfield Town Center (4.6 miles)
• AMC Hoffman Center 22 (6 miles)