2325 Madison Ave, Ogden, UT 84401
To contact a resident: (801) 399-5846
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Aspen Park Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Aspen Park Assisted Living offers competitively priced accommodations in comparison to both Weber County and the broader state of Utah. The monthly rates for studio apartments at Aspen Park are an attractive $2,500, notably lower than the county average of $2,805 and significantly less than the state average of $3,206. For one-bedroom units, Aspen Park's pricing at $3,200 is closely aligned with Weber County's rate of $3,135 while still being more economical than the state's typical cost of $3,556. Both semi-private and private room options reflect similar trends; the semi-private rate at Aspen Park is set at $3,200, which is more affordable than the county's average of $3,574 and nearly on par with the state's figure of $3,596. However, it's worth noting that the private room option is priced at $6,000 at Aspen Park - higher than both Weber County's average of $6,500 and Utah's state average of $3,782 - suggesting a premium for enhanced privacy and amenities. Overall, Aspen Park provides a range of options that cater to different budgets while maintaining a standard of care that residents appreciate.
| Floor plans | Aspen Park Assisted Living | Weber County | Utah |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $2,500 | $2,805 | $3,206 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,200 | $3,135 | $3,556 |
| Semi-Private | $3,200 | $3,574 | $3,596 |
| Private | $6,000 | $6,500 | $3,782 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Maple Springs
$2,550 to $3,400 / month18.6 miles away -
from +$495 / mo
Our House Of Ogden
$2,995 to $4,200 / month3.0 miles away -
from +$495 / mo
Whisper Cove Assisted Living Center
$2,995 to $3,895 / month14.0 miles away -
About the same
Treeo South Ogden
$2,530 to $4,100 / month5.1 miles away -
from +$495 / mo
Hidden Valley Assisted Living & Memory Care
$2,995 to $3,500 / month4.0 miles away
Overall Review of Aspen Park Assisted Living
Pros
The facility is an awesome place that loves its residents.- It is a nice, clean place where everyone seems happy and laughing.
- The staff at Aspen Assisted Living has worked very hard to help residents feel at home and keeps families informed about their progress.
- Kelly is an amazing administrator whom everyone loves, and Debra is a fabulous nurse.
- The facility has a great staff, is always clean and well maintained, and has a family-like feel.
- It offers a small, home-like atmosphere with good food and good people.
Cons
The staff can be mean and neglectful at times.- A former resident claimed that a tablet and $900 were taken after staff entered the room without informing them.
- A resident was exposed to black mold for over three years and developed related health symptoms.
- The state of Utah is currently investigating them.
- The facility treats its employees like dirt and overworks CNAs and kitchen staff.
- Promises were never followed through.
- Money is more important than residents.
- The facility went downhill after Kelly left.
Review
Aspen Park Assisted Living in Ogden is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like environment where residents are known by name and staff work to create a warm, neighborly vibe. The community can feel intimate and unhurried, with an emphasis on social connection and a dining experience that encourages residents to mingle in a pleasant setting. When leadership is steady, families report attentive care, clean spaces, and a sense that residents are genuinely cared for. This configuration tends to suit seniors who value personal touches, regular interaction with staff, and a lifestyle that mirrors a well-run, cozy home rather than a large institutional setting.
That said, alternatives should be on the radar for anyone who prioritizes consistent governance, rigorous safety oversight, and transparent operations. Several reviews raise red flags about management stability, accountability, and safety incidents, including concerns about room access and even mold exposure. The seeming willingness of leadership to listen and respond fluctuates, which means that for a senior with complex needs, or for families who cannot tolerate turnover or opaque processes, a larger, more standardized community with proven regulatory compliance may be a wiser choice. In short, stability and rigorous oversight matter more here than in some other options.
The positives paint a compelling picture when things are running smoothly: a smaller facility with a family-like feel, a reputation among many residents for kindness, and staff who are described as attentive during peak moments. Cleanliness and a generally pleasant atmosphere emerge as consistent themes, and administrators who are praised by residents and families contribute to a sense of partnership in care. However, the most consequential downside surfaces in the records and anecdotes about turnover, sporadic responsiveness, and episodes where promises were not kept. When the leadership shifts or employees feel overworked, the warmth can fray, and the daily experience for residents can veer toward uneven quality.
Those competing forces, homey ambiance and responsive care on good days versus leadership instability and safety concerns on others, must be weighed carefully. The small size that creates intimacy can also magnify problems if management is inconsistent or if staff morale dips. Families should not assume that a friendly front means all core risks are mitigated; the possibility of miscommunication, delayed repairs, or gaps in safety protocols is repeatedly cited. The balance hinges on current leadership and the facility’s present compliance posture. Pros offsetting cons only when current administration demonstrates clear, continuous commitment to resident welfare and transparent operations.
For families exploring Aspen Park, a pragmatic path is essential. Schedule a current tour and insist on speaking with several residents and their families about latest experiences. Request the most recent state inspection and any corrective action plans, and verify who the on-site administrator is today and what changes have occurred recently. Probe about staff-to-resident ratios, turnover rates, and how emergencies and housekeeping issues are handled. Observe the dining area, activity programming, and whether staff seem consistently available and engaged. Above all, confirm that leadership has a stable, verifiable track record of addressing concerns promptly and openly, rather than promising improvements that do not materialize.
Ultimately, Aspen Park is a viable option for seniors who prize a warm, small-community feel and can anchor their decision in a current, solid report on management stability and safety practices. If current leadership cannot be verified as stable and proactive, and if there is any lingering doubt about safety, transparency, or staff morale, pursuing other communities with a longer track record of consistent governance is prudent. The decisive move is to balance the appeal of a homey atmosphere with an unambiguous commitment to resident safety and reliable, responsive care. Gather firsthand impressions, verify governance, and choose based on who can sustain quality care over time.
Assisted Living
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities on-site
Air-conditioning
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Ground floor units
Handicap accessible
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Respite or short term stays offered
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Gluten-free
Art classes
BBQs or picnics
Birthday parties
Day trips and outings
Gardening club
Live musical performances
Live well programs
Visiting Rabbi
Visiting chaplain or priest
Wii bowling
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps