17188 Oak Grove Lane, New Caney, TX 77357
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of J And D Personal Care Home
Pros
The son loves the care home.
Cons
The run-down, bed-bug-infested trailers ought not be licensed to shelter people with disabilities.- The place is described as a house of horror, eliciting sympathy for those affected.
- The facility would provide the lowest quality of living standards, with staff likened to a convicted felon and a meth lab vibe.
- It allegedly harbors bed bug infestations and staff would treat residents with the same care as a cockroach, risking emotional trauma.
- The trailers are in terrible shape and not worth 700 dollars per person.
- J and D Personal Care Home is a great disappointment, failing to meet ADA accessibility standards, nourishment, or care.
- The care offered is insufficient and cleanliness is lacking, with improvements only when requested.
Review
J And D Personal Care Home in New Caney, TX is best suited for families operating under a tight budget who accept a basic, home-like setting with uneven maintenance. This community can feel like a practical choice for residents with relatively low care needs who value familiarity and continuity, especially when a long-tenured resident relationship may provide a sense of stability. In essence, it serves households where cost is the primary constraint and expectations around pristine facilities and hospital-grade safety are reduced in exchange for something simpler and more affordable.
Those who should actively consider alternatives are families that require reliable cleanliness, strong safety standards, professional staff, and predictable nutrition. The reviews repeatedly raise concerns about health and upkeep, and any family prioritizing ADA accessibility, modern amenities, or a consistently high standard of care should look elsewhere. If a resident benefits from robust oversight, clear governance, and a facility that can demonstrate compliant infrastructure, this is not the right match. For many, the combination of safety risks and subpar conditions makes other options a wiser investment.
On the bright side, there is a defensible if narrow pro: one resident’s relative reports ongoing satisfaction and longevity, suggesting that for some individuals the people and routine may feel familiar and comforting over time. There is also an impression, at times, that staff will address basic needs when prompted, such as cleaning rooms after requests. These factors can translate into a sense of dependability for a few residents, but they stand in stark contrast to the louder, more pervasive red flags raised in other reviews and should not be mistaken for a reliable, top-tier care experience.
The weight of the cons is substantial and unlikely to be offset by the limited positives. Multiple accounts describe living spaces that feel dilapidated or unsafe, with grim portrayals of trailers and a sense of overall neglect. Reports of infestation and substandard housing practices evoke serious health concerns that any family must weigh against potential savings. Nutritional shortcomings, inconsistent grooming, and a perceived lack of professional, compassionate care further undermine trust in the routine operations. Add to that impressions of staff personalities that some reviewers characterize as uncaring or opaque, and the risk-to-benefit equation becomes unfavorable for most.
For families evaluating options, a practical decision framework is essential here. Request a full tour with a candid conversation about pest control, housekeeping frequency, and how frequently rooms are cleaned. Ask to see recent meal plans and to verify adherence to any dietary restrictions. Inquire about ADA accessibility features, emergency call systems, staffing levels at various shifts, and background checks for caregivers. Seek documentation on licensing, inspection results, and any corrective action taken. If these fundamentals cannot be demonstrated clearly, the balance tips decisively away from this community.
In the end, the prudent conclusion is clear: this facility is not a strong fit for most seniors seeking reliable care and safe, comfortable surroundings. The severity of the negative experiences documented, ranging from pervasive cleanliness and safety concerns to notable gaps in nutrition and professional care, outweigh any cost considerations. Alternatives that offer cleaner environments, well-maintained facilities, accessible design, and consistently attentive staff will serve families far better. If choosing J And D, it should be solely as a last resort, with explicit plans for ongoing oversight, rapid escalation if issues arise, and a clear exit strategy should conditions fail to improve.
16 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
George Bush Intercontinental (16 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities