717 Cindy Drive, Columbia, SC 29203
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Reese's Community Care Home 2
Cons
Dhec had to get involved and relocate most of the residents.- They should lock up every one of the employees for taking advantage of the elderly.
Review
Reese's Community Care Home 2 in Columbia, SC operates as a small, home-style residence rather than a sprawling assisted living campus. It is best suited for seniors who value a tightly knit, low-key environment where caregiving feels personal and unobtrusive, and where daily routines can be tailored with a lighter touch than in larger facilities. Families weighing this option should expect a setup that emphasizes close-day-to-day contact with a smaller caregiving team and a more autonomous feel for residents who do not require intensive medical management. The upside for the right resident is simple: easier access to caregivers, greater familiarity with staff, and a setting that can feel more like a private home than a clinical residence.
However, this type of setting also carries caveats. For seniors who require extensive medical oversight, complex cares, or strong regulatory assurances, Reese's Community Care Home 2 may not measure up to alternatives. Those who insist on transparent, consistently reliable staffing, robust incident reporting, and assured abuse safeguards should look toward larger, fully licensed facilities with documented oversight and regular inspections. Families expecting high-touch programming for memory care, or those who want a facility able to quickly scale up services during a health crisis, should consider other options. In short, the community may fit a specific niche, but not all who need assisted living.
Three key positives emerge across the available positive feedback: residents can experience a more intimate daily rhythm, caregivers are potentially more accessible, and the atmosphere tends to feel less institutional. The favorable reviews imply a setting where staff know residents by name and can respond quickly to small needs. For families prioritizing warm, personal interactions and a predictable routine, those attributes become meaningful advantages that can translate into real comfort and continuity of care. Yet these positives rely on stable staffing and consistent practice, two factors that the less favorable reports hint at fragility around.
On the downside, the two one-star accounts cast a long shadow. They describe serious concerns about how residents are treated, with claims of exploitation and external intervention by the state health department to relocate residents. Such allegations are not minor weather vanes; they signal potential safety and ethical red flags that require rigorous verification. Even if not representative of the majority, they raise questions about governance, supervision, and whether vulnerable residents are adequately protected from mistreatment. The presence of state-level involvement suggests that independent oversight found issues significant enough to require action.
Given this mix, the decision should weigh the gravity of the safety concerns against the upside of a home-like setting. Pros offsetting the main cons only hold if the operator demonstrates sustained improvements, transparent reporting, and spotless compliance history going forward. Prospective buyers should demand current licensing status, inspection summaries, incident-report logs, and direct conversations with staff, residents, and families who recently left or transitioned from the home. Practical steps include visiting at different times, reviewing meal and activity schedules, inspecting living areas for cleanliness, and asking about staffing ratios, training, and how abuse complaints are handled and resolved.
The bottom line is clear: Reese's Community Care Home 2 can be a good match for a resident who prioritizes a small, homelike atmosphere and who has strong assurances that safety and staff accountability are actively managed. For families that cannot tolerate reports of mistreatment or regulatory intervention, alternatives with more transparent oversight and proven protections are strongly advised. This isn’t a blanket rejection of the setting, but a call for rigorous due diligence and a stringent comparison against other licensed options in Columbia. A careful, two-test approach, visit with questions, then check licensure and complaint histories, will yield the most reliable forecast for a continued, dignified life.
5 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Columbia Metropolitan (12 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Intimate 10-bed home with comprehensive caregiving (24-hour supervision, ADL assistance, medication management, meals, and medical transport).
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained