601 Sugar Hollow Road, Tunkhannock, PA 18657
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Ann S Grove Personal Care Home Costs & Pricing
Ann S Grove Personal Care Home offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly in comparison to the broader market rates in Wyoming County and the state of Pennsylvania. For semi-private rooms, residents can expect to pay $1,400 per month, a significant savings compared to the county's average of $2,914 and the statewide average of $3,542. Likewise, studio accommodations are available at $1,700 per month, which is notably lower than Wyoming County's average of $2,300 and Pennsylvania's average of $3,737. These cost advantages reflect Ann S Grove's commitment to providing affordable personal care options without compromising on quality or comfort.
| Floor plans | Ann S Grove Personal Care Home | Wyoming County | Pennsylvania |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,400 | $2,914 | $3,542 |
| Studio | $1,700 | $2,300 | $3,737 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Ann S Grove Personal Care Home
Pros
Ann's Grove is a unique and remarkable place.
The staff are very nice.
The food is good.
The facility offers bingo, crafts, and a library.
The rooms are clean.
The home is very caring and clean.
The atmosphere is homey and cozy, and residents are content and happy.
Cons
The staff do not shower patients as often as they should.
There isnāt enough staff to assist the number of patients.
The place smells like urine and feces.
The facility serves only one hot meal a day for lunch and does not offer enough food to patients.
The staff and owner yell at patients and call them retarded.
No one would bring a loved one here, and the facility should not be in business.
Review
Ann S Grove Personal Care Home in Tunkhannock is best suited for seniors who want a compact, home-like setting where staff interactions feel personal and routines stay predictable. It serves residents who need help with daily tasks but do not require intensive nursing care, and who prize social engagement and a cozy, family-style atmosphere. The environment tends to be clean and comfortable, with residents who respond well to informal activities, and families seeking a smaller, more intimate alternative to a large campus will find this community aligns with that preference.
That said, prospective residents should weigh alternatives if safety and consistent care are non-negotiable. Several reviews celebrate warmth and friendliness, but there is a clear warning embedded in one strong critique about rude behavior, insufficient staffing, and lapses in basic care and hygiene. For anyone whose loved one requires steady supervision, regular showers, or more systematic attention to nutrition, a facility with higher staffing ratios and stricter oversight may be a wiser choice. In short, the homey appeal is real, but it comes with caveats that matter when care needs are higher or more complex.
On the positive side, the strongest assets are tangible and predictable. The food is described as good, and the staff is consistently characterized as pleasant, approachable, and capable of forming meaningful connections with residents. Clean rooms and a clean, comfortable overall environment reinforce a sense of safety and dignity. The social fabric also matters: a routine of bingo, crafts, and a modest library provides meaningful engagement and daily structure that can ease transitions for families and help residents feel occupied and valued.
However, concerns voiced by at least one reviewer cannot be ignored. Reported issues include perceived staffing shortages, infrequent personal care such as showers, and an odor that suggests sanitation lapses. Equally troubling are allegations of staff or owner communication that crosses professional boundaries, including hostile remarks toward residents. While it is important to weigh these reports alongside the many positive comments, they point to gaps in consistent quality that could escalate risk if not carefully monitored or addressed.
The practical takeaway is that the positive climate and intimate setting can offset some drawbacks for residents who prioritize companionship, routine, and a warm, homelike vibe. If these factors matter most and the resident tolerates potential variability in day-to-day care, Ann S Grove can be a good fit. Conversely, for families prioritizing consistently robust cleanliness, reliable daily nutrition, and respectful, professional handling of all care tasks, it would be prudent to explore alternatives with stronger staffing guarantees and stricter oversight.
To make an informed decision, focus the inquiry on concrete, visit-level observations. Check current staffing levels during peak hours, review how showers and personal care are managed, and verify who supervises daily routines. Ask to see recent inspection findings, inspect common areas for odors, and talk directly with several residents about their day-to-day experiences. If the answers align with a dependable, respectful standard of care and you observe a genuine, caring staff culture, Ann S Grove offers a viable, heartfelt option. If not, itās worth continuing the search for a setting that delivers more consistent hygiene, nutrition, and professional conduct.








Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs
