8014 South East Lambert Street, Portland, OR 97206
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Mt. Scott Residential Care Home Costs & Pricing
Mt. Scott Residential Care Home offers a range of accommodation options at competitive prices compared to the broader market in Multnomah County and the state of Oregon. For those considering semi-private rooms, Mt. Scott's monthly cost of $3,630 is notably lower than the county average of $4,011 and significantly below the state average of $4,457. However, for private rooms, while Mt. Scott's rate is $4,356, it exceeds both the county's average of $3,227 and the state's average of $3,424. Additionally, studio accommodations at Mt. Scott are priced at $4,719, which again surpasses local and state averages - $3,455 and $3,815 respectively. This pricing structure showcases Mt. Scott's strategic positioning within the residential care market: providing affordable semi-private options while reflecting higher costs for more individualized living arrangements.
| Floor plans | Mt. Scott Residential Care Home | Multnomah County | Oregon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,630 | $4,011 | $4,457 |
| Private | $4,356 | $3,227 | $3,424 |
| Studio | $4,719 | $3,455 | $3,815 |
Overall Review of Mt. Scott Residential Care Home
Pros
The staff are caring.- Any concerns are taken care of.
- The location is convenient, being close to grocery, coffee, and restaurants.
- The new housekeeper is good.
- The building is old, but improvements have been made.
- There are a couple of good caregivers.
Cons
The facility is terribly administered.- The caregivers are mostly poor; only a couple are good.
- The food is unappetizing.
- Management is poor.
- There is a lack of parking.
- The building is old and needs more improvements.
- The facility transferred a patient to another hospital without notifying the family or sharing personal information; the patient was left for months without eyeglasses or basic contact information.
Review
Mt. Scott Residential Care Home in Portland is best suited for families with tight budgets who need a convenient, central location and are willing to accept uneven care quality and administrative oversight. The strongest selling points here are affordability and proximity to groceries, cafés, and other daily conveniences. This community does not deliver a consistently high-touch care model, and that reality colors every assessment. For residents who can tolerate fluctuating staff responsiveness and dining experiences that are inconsistent at best, the location and cost may feel workable. In short, the appeal rests on practicality and price rather than a promise of dependable, superior care.
Explicitly, alternatives should be considered for residents with memory impairment requiring stable routines or for families who cannot tolerate vague communication and delayed responses. If safety, transparent transfer procedures, consistent meals, and dependable staff are non-negotiables, this house should not be the first choice. Those prioritizing a modern, well-maintained building with ample parking and clearly documented care plans will likely feel frustrated here. Even for those drawn to its central location, governance and daily operations shortcomings make pursuing other options a prudent step.
On the upside, there are modest positives that may matter to certain residents or families. Some staff members are described as caring, and when concerns arise, responses can be timely. A new housekeeper has earned some positive notes, and the building has seen incremental improvements. The location remains convenient for errands and social visits, and a subset of caregivers can form meaningful connections with residents. These elements offer a modest foundation for daily life if expectations are modest and if the resident’s basic needs do not require specialized supervision or a tightly coordinated care plan.
Yet the core liabilities overwhelm these small gains. Administrative missteps are cited repeatedly, with caregivers often described as inadequate and management labeled as poor. The most grave failure involves transferring a resident with advancing Alzheimer’s to a state hospital without family notification or proper handoff, leaving the family in the dark for months and the resident without essential items like eyeglasses. Such gaps touch safety, privacy, and respect, severely eroding trust and complicating any attempt to implement coordinated care. A practical drawback, parking scarcity, further complicates day-to-day routines and family involvement, adding friction to an already fragile balance.
When evaluating options, families should test several hard questions. What is the governance structure, and how are concerns escalated and tracked? What are the documented transfer and discharge procedures, and who must notify families? How is meal quality addressed, and is there an ongoing plan to elevate nutrition and variety? How often is the building updated, and is there a reliable parking strategy? Is staff turnover stable, and what training supports memory care or dementia-related needs? The answers to these questions will distinguish whether the apparent weaknesses are manageable or constitute material, ongoing risk.
Ultimately, the balance here favors caution. The combination of weak administration, inconsistent caregiving, and troubling safety lapses means this community will rarely meet expectations for reliable daily support and transparent, respectful communication. For most residents, especially those with cognitive impairment, complex medical needs, or those requiring predictable routines, alternatives with stronger governance and a proven track record should be pursued. If the exploration continues, insist on a thorough tour, request conversations with current residents and families, and obtain written policies on transfers, meal programs, and incident reporting. A prudent choice honors safety and dignity, and that demands moving beyond proximity and price to a facility that demonstrates steady, accountable care.
46 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Activities on-site
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Financial aid
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Portland International (8 miles away)
24-hour call system
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs