244 Highview Landing, Columbus, OH 43207
To contact a resident: (614) 492-1190
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Highview Place Costs & Pricing
Highview Place offers competitive monthly rates for its accommodations, particularly when compared to the broader market in Franklin County and the state of Ohio. For instance, a one-bedroom unit at Highview Place is priced at $595, significantly lower than the county's average of $3,645 and the state average of $3,712. Similarly, two-bedroom units are available for just $615 per month, standing in stark contrast to Franklin County's average of $3,237 and Ohio's average of $3,501. This positions Highview Place as an attractive option for individuals seeking affordable living arrangements without compromising on quality.
| Floor plans | Highview Place | Franklin County | Ohio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $595 | $3,645 | $3,712 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $615 | $3,237 | $3,501 |
Overall Review of Highview Place
Pros
The apartments are nice.- The complex is usually quiet.
- The property is quiet.
Cons
They have become a slumlord and don’t clear sidewalks of snow or ice.- They throw old furnaces in the grass and leave them there for over a week.
- They rarely answer the phone or return calls, and office hours are inconvenient.
- They take no pride in the property and show no idea how to run the business.
- Maintenance takes weeks to fix issues, with long waits and mismanaged repairs.
- They operate only two days a week, making it hard to get service.
- They neglect emergency repairs, even in hot weather when the A/C is known to be broken.
- There is no heat and no emergency maintenance available.
- They fail to address safety concerns, with trash in the parking lot, drugs being sold nearby, and cameras that don’t work.
Review
Highview Place in Columbus is best suited for tenants who value quiet, predictable living and can tolerate a hands-off management approach. The core appeal is a low-pressure, independent environment where on-site staff are infrequent and response times can be slow. For residents who can withstand ongoing maintenance delays and who can manage their own repair needs, the apartments themselves can be acceptable. In practical terms, however, the overall living experience hinges on the reliability of management and the property’s upkeep, which, in this case, is not consistently present. This is not a community built around proactive service; it is a place you endure rather than a place you feel supported.
Alternatives should be strongly considered by seniors or families that require dependable maintenance, regular communication, and robust safety measures. The most consistent red flags in reviews are limited office hours, open only two days per week, and phone access that frequently goes unanswered. Urgent issues recur with slow or no escalation, leaving residents to improvise. Problems range from heat and air-conditioning failures to roof leaks and pest activity, all of which have lingered for weeks or months. For anyone who values timely fixes, clear accountability, and a sense of security, this property should not be the default choice. A search for communities with on-site management and documented service standards is warranted.
Two small positives emerge in the critiques: the property is described as quiet, and some units are visually acceptable when first viewed. Yet these superficial advantages do little to offset the scale of the negatives. The real living risk lies in the combination of neglect and delayed service, no heat in cold weather, unreliable cooling in heat, malfunctioning plumbing, and leaky roofs that go unfixed for extended periods. Snow removal evaporates from the spring report, leaving icy, hazardous walkways. Parking area cleanliness and general curb appeal decline as well. When a residence’s external and mechanical systems deteriorate while management remains unreachable, the perceived niceness of interiors loses its staying power.
Maintenance is characterized as chronically delayed and poorly coordinated, with tenants repeatedly reporting unanswered calls and doors left unanswered at the office. The consequence is a persistent feeling of being ignored, especially for those balancing work or family obligations. The limited office presence compounds the frustration, making routine repairs and emergency response unpredictable. Reviews describe a degraded common area and unsafe conditions, including reports of rodents or wildlife in inaccessible areas and a roof that leaks. The landlord is disparaged as neglectful and disengaged, with accusations that the property is poorly cared for and mismanaged. In short, the operational culture here translates into ongoing instability and frequent disruption to daily life.
For families comparing assisted living options, this property functions more as a rental with risk than as a supportive community. Anyone who needs reliable maintenance, predictable safety, or access to timely emergency responses should rule it out in favor of facilities that offer on-site management seven days a week, clear remediation timelines, and actively maintained infrastructure. If exploration continues, demand a current service-level agreement, insist on written repair-response times, and verify HVAC and roof status, pest control measures, and exterior lighting. Visit during adverse weather to assess snow removal and exterior upkeep. Otherwise, align with communities that demonstrate consistent stewardship and a track record of resident welfare.
In practical terms, Highview Place does not meet the expectations of families seeking dependable, senior-friendly housing with proactive care. The dominant themes across reviews, unresponsiveness, maintenance delays, heating and cooling failures, and safety concerns, outweigh any quiet living advantages. The few perceived positives cannot compensate for ongoing service gaps and questionable management practices. For decision-makers, the prudent move is to pursue alternatives with proven management responsiveness, transparent maintenance policies, and safer, well-maintained environments. If a choice lands here, proceed with rigorous verification and a plan to address every deficiency; otherwise, redirect to communities with established commitments to resident welfare and reliable on-site support.
Active Adult Communities (55+)
Activities off-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
John Glenn Columbus International Airport (9 miles away)
Exploring the World of Home Health Nurses: Qualifications, Roles, and Hiring Tips
Navigating Medicare Coverage for In-Home Care Services
In-Home Care Costs in 2025: A Detailed State-by-State Exploration