St Mary Of The Woods Costs & Pricing
St. Mary of the Woods presents a range of monthly living costs that reflect its unique offerings and location. For a one-bedroom unit, residents can expect to pay $3,507, which is notably higher than the average for Lorain County at $3,054 but slightly lower than the state average of $3,712. Those seeking two-bedroom accommodations will find St. Mary of the Woods at $4,101 - again above Lorain County's average of $3,211 yet competitive compared to Ohio's statewide figure of $3,501. Studio apartments are priced at $4,620, exceeding both county and state averages significantly; Lorain County's average stands at $3,500 while the overall state average is $3,727. These figures indicate that while St. Mary of the Woods may be on the higher end relative to local options, it likely offers distinct advantages in services and resident experience that justify these costs.
| Floor plans | St Mary Of The Woods | Lorain County | Ohio |
|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $3,507 | $3,054 | $3,712 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $4,101 | $3,211 | $3,501 |
| Studio | $4,620 | $3,500 | $3,727 |
Overall Review of St Mary Of The Woods
differentiator
18 reviews mention this
Dining options draw mixed feedback
Dining is a standout topic, with residents describing both strong meal quality and added food-related fees.
Many residents and families praise the quality of meals, describing restaurant-style dining, made-to-order selections, and staff who accommodate requests. The kitchen is also mentioned in positive notes about variety and service at the table. At the same time, other reviewers criticize food quality and say some items or meal delivery have become extra-cost add-ons. A few comments also mention gaps like missing items in the bistro or limited options at certain times.
common
30 reviews mention this
Staff compassion is frequently praised
Residents and families often describe caring, compassionate staff members who respond to needs.
Across reviews, families frequently call out compassion and professionalism, including staff who take time to listen, help with therapy needs, and support families through transitions. Multiple notes also emphasize pleasant interactions in daily moments, along with clean, well-maintained spaces that match the caring tone residents describe. Several reviewers contrast this with staffing or response problems, but even those critiques often acknowledge that some individual caregivers are kind. Overall, the strongest recurring message is that many staff members genuinely care about residentsā well-being.
caveat
16 reviews mention this
Care response can be hit-or-miss
Some residents report delays and missed basics that can affect comfort and safety.
A consistent downside theme in multiple reviews is that call-light response and basic care can be slow, with some families describing difficulty getting help for toileting, bathing, or assistance with transfers. Several critical reviews describe situations involving hygiene concerns or delayed attention to health issues, while others mention communication gaps between shifts and caregivers. Even when care improves after advocacy or when families are actively involved, the pattern still comes through as inconsistent. This matters because the reviews also include serious safety concerns tied to falls and bed-wetting or cleanliness issues.
common
6 reviews mention this
Faith-based programming is prominent
Religious and devotional programming is a recurring part of daily life residents mention.
Many reviewers describe regular worship and pastoral support, including Mass and a pastoral care department. Families also mention chapel access and devotional activities on-site, along with a sense of spirituality in how the community serves residents. A few comments tie the experience to specific faith events and a welcoming atmosphere for both residents and guests. While most feedback is positive, one review notes concerns about overall care in the rehab and skilled nursing context.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Overall pricing feels high to some
Several families say the community is expensive, especially when extra charges appear.
Some reviewers say pricing is higher than expected compared with other options, with one explicitly calling it more expensive than many others. In the negative reviews, families describe ānickel and dimeā concerns, including food-related charges or fees for delivery in assisted living. Even positive reviewers sometimes frame value as something you get when you pay the higher rate. Taken together, reviews suggest cost is a meaningful consideration, particularly if expectations were set during tours or prior to move-in.
common
4 reviews mention this
Therapy experiences vary by unit
Therapy can feel highly supportive for some residents, while others report serious rehab frustrations.
Several reviews praise physical and occupational therapy, describing knowledgeable therapists, encouragement, and wound or recovery support after surgery or strokes. Other comments, however, criticize rehab operations for responsiveness, cleanliness, and day-to-day pain management. These mixed reports suggest outcomes may depend on the specific section and staffing in place at the time. If youāre evaluating therapy care, the reviews indicate itās worth asking detailed questions about schedules, response times, and how concerns are handled.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.