120 23Rd Avenue E, West Fargo, ND 58078
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Kind-Er Care Home II
Pros
The home is beautiful and residents are treated like family by the staff.- The staff are kind, loving, and attentive.
- Residents are treated like family by the caregivers.
- End-of-life care is handled exceptionally well.
- Families can spend meaningful time with their loved ones, creating fond memories.
Cons
The aunt hates living at Kindercare.- Melanie called the police to remove a friend, keeping her isolated from loved ones, which is inhumane.
- The owner uses ownership of the building to keep the aunt isolated from friends and family.
- The owner places visitors on a list to keep them out and never let them inside again.
Review
Kind-Er Care Home II in West Fargo is best suited for families seeking a warm, home-like assisted living environment where staff are consistently kind and residents are treated as family. The community excels when a small-house feel matters: intimate common areas, highly personal attention from care teams, and a culture that prioritizes emotional connection alongside daily support. For seniors who value stability, predictable routines, and an environment that feels less institutional, Kind-Er Care II delivers comfort and a sense of belonging. It is particularly appealing to families who want to be actively involved in daily care and end-of-life moments, with staff who welcome participation rather than deferment.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families with heavier medical needs or a desire for more formal oversight. If complex medication regimens, frequent skilled nursing interventions, or strict, standardized safety protocols are essential, a larger or more clinically oriented facility could be a better fit. Likewise, households that require clearly documented visitation policies and easy access for loved ones may prefer places with transparent governance and external accountability. For residents who prize broad social programming and more varied, outward-facing activity calendars, a setting with a more expansive community footprint might be more satisfying.
On the upside, residents experience a beautiful, home-like environment and consistently warm, attentive care. Reviewers describe staff as kind, loving, and genuinely invested in the resident’s well-being, with a sense that families are treated as partners in care. The end-of-life experience is repeatedly highlighted as compassionate and deeply respectful, with families feeling included and supported during a profoundly intimate time. Those elements translate into real peace of mind for loved ones and can make transitions easier, reducing the stress that often accompanies aging in place or the decline toward the end of life.
Yet the record does carry a notable caveat. A single review raises serious concerns about isolation and restricted access to visitors, alleging police involvement aimed at keeping a resident apart from loved ones. While this is an outlier relative to the majority, it cannot be dismissed. It spotlights important questions about governance, resident rights, and how visitation is managed in practice. Given the owner’s direct involvement in building management, families should probe for clarity on visitation policies, enforcement consistency, and the mechanisms that protect resident autonomy and family access. Until those policies are fully understood, this remains a risk signal that warrants verification during tours.
The positives can be decisive when tours confirm robust, compassionate care and a truly homelike atmosphere. The strong, consistent praise from most reviews, paired with the ability to involve family members closely in daily routines and care moments, creates a compelling value proposition for those who fear the clinical impersonalization of larger facilities. The key is to verify that the environment lives up to the affectionate tone described by many families, including transparent, written policies on visitation and resident rights. When policy and practice align, the advantages of warmth, dignity, and personalized attention generally outweigh the concerns raised by a single negative account.
Bottom line: Kind-Er Care Home II is a compelling option for families who prize warmth, individualized attention, and a dignified, home-centric approach to aging and end-of-life care. It is less suitable for those requiring strong, formal medical oversight or highly visible, easily verifiable visitation policies. For families on the fence, a structured visit is essential. Observe how staff interact with residents, ask to review care plans, inquire about clinician availability, and specifically raise questions about visitation policies and resident rights. If the answers are clear and the environment feels consistent with the promises heard from most families, Kind-Er Care Home II can deliver a high-quality, emotionally supportive home that families will come to trust.
12 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Hector International (7 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States