Assisted Living at Fairport Baptist Homes

Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby

• About the same

  Rochester Presbyterian Home

  4.8 from 37 reviews

  $5,119 / month

  10.8 miles away
• About the same

  Heather Heights Of Pittsford

  4.4 from 125 reviews

  $5,160 to $7,899 / month

  4.8 miles away
• from -$558 / mo

  Crimson Ridge Meadows

  4.3 from 60 reviews

  $4,495 to $5,370 / month

  15.3 miles away
• from -$658 / mo

  The Landing of Brighton

  4.3 from 98 reviews

  $4,395 to $5,995 / month

  7.2 miles away
• from -$578 / mo

  Brentland Woods

  3.7 from 10 reviews

  $4,475 to $4,785 / month

  10.3 miles away

Pros

• The facility is described as a very nice place.
• The facility has clean rooms, clean residents, and kind, super-attentive staff.
• The staff are described as fantastic and great, with patients who never feel alone because they are very patient.
• The place is described as cozy and inviting, with welcoming and friendly staff, and it is highly recommended.
• The reviewer recommends the Fairport Baptist Home nursing home.
• The facility is a nice place to visit, with visits described as a pleasant experience.
• It is considered a decent place.

Cons

• The day-to-day care at the facility was horrible.
• Staff were chronically short-staffed and could not provide basic care, including feeding residents who needed assistance.
• Residents were neglected, with help arriving only after long delays and some calls for help unanswered for over 30 minutes.
• A resident lost over 50 pounds, became dehydrated, and ultimately suffered a completely compacted colon, dehydration, and pneumonia from aspiration due to negligent care.
• Documentation was falsified when state investigators were involved.
• An abusive nurse and other staff were accused of neglectful and humiliating conduct toward residents and their families for questioning care.
• Since the ownership change, care declined and there is a persistent staff shortage.
• Billing practices were problematic, with ongoing bills and unresponsive staff, fueling concerns about the quality of care.
• The facility was described as a place to avoid for loved ones and not worth recommending.

Review

This community is best suited for seniors who prize a warm, home-like atmosphere and expect to rely on active family involvement to ensure daily care. It is a practical fit for residents needing light assistance with meals, dressing, or mobility, along with a steady sense of community and social engagement. Those who require high-acuity medical oversight, continuous nursing supervision, or complex rehab services should look elsewhere. Families without the bandwidth to monitor care closely or to push for accountability should consider alternatives that offer more consistent staffing, clearer communication, and stronger clinical oversight.

On the plus side, residents often encounter clean, welcoming environments and a facility that feels comfortable and approachable. When staff are present and engaged, the atmosphere can be friendly, with attentive aides and a cooperative nursing team that supports activities and social connections. Several reviews highlight dependable housekeeping, pleasant common spaces, and a sense that staff members know residents by name and strive to make them feel at home. For families who value a cozy setting and regular personal interactions, these strengths can contribute meaningfully to daily quality of life.

Yet the most consequential threads running through the feedback are concerns about staffing, care reliability, and administrative responsiveness. Recurrent accounts describe delays in assistance, insufficient help with basic needs, and moments where residents were left unattended for extended periods. Dehydration, weight loss, and hospital readmissions are cited as the outcomes of care gaps, with accusations of missed medications and inadequate monitoring. Billing disputes, opaque communication, and at least one pattern of documentation concerns further undermine confidence in day-to-day governance. Taken together, these factors present a serious risk profile that colors every other consideration.

The pragmatic takeaway is that the facility’s tangible strengths do not clearly offset the core risks. A pleasant environment and amicable staff do not erase reports of neglect or inconsistent responsiveness. For families willing to stay deeply involved, participating in care planning, monitoring call bells, and coordinating with clinicians, the institution can meet everyday needs and provide a supportive social structure. For others, especially those with higher care needs or limited ability to supervise care, the probability of systemic shortcomings becoming disruptive is too high to overlook.

For families considering a move, concrete steps matter. Schedule multiple visits at different times to observe staffing patterns and response times. Request candid conversations with the administrator and the Director of Nursing, and ask for current state inspection results, incident reports, and the most recent quality improvement plans. Talk with several residents’ families to gauge consistency of care over time. Review the care plan carefully, verify medication handling and hydration protocols, and press for transparent billing practices. If possible, negotiate a trial period during which care quality and responsiveness can be evaluated in real-time.

In the end, this community is a calculated bet. It can deliver a comforting, community-focused living experience for residents and families who can stay actively involved and demand accountability. However, the weight of reported neglect, staffing challenges, and administrative opacity makes alternatives worth strong consideration for those prioritizing reliable, high-quality care with demonstrable safety and clear governance. The prudent path is to compare options, insist on verifiable safeguards, and choose a setting where the risk-to-benefit balance aligns with the family’s caregiving capacity and the resident’s medical needs.