1305 Kings Court, Reno, NV 89503
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Evergreen Residence
Pros
Evergreen Residence is a small, attentive place where caregivers give Mom a lot of attention.
The facility is clean and the owner is there nearly every day, making it easy to address any concerns.
Mom has a nice, fairly large room with space for a roommate and a patio to look out on, and furnishings can be rearranged to suit preferences.
The meals are really good, and Mom loves the food; she even shared a meal with a family member.
There is no worry about Mom’s care because she loves the people there, and she receives a morning bath every day.
The staff provide light entertainment and there are activities such as puzzles, a TV, and a piano for residents.
Cons
The owner is described as shady and incredibly cheap, showing little concern for residents.
The home is disorganized with no record keeping, and the staff are coached to say certain things to family members.
They push to use their medical staff but never provide information or updates; only the original intake report is shared when records are requested.
They allegedly kept the mother doped up and confined to bed.
They moved the mother out of bed despite medical issues, which led to additional injuries.
Weeks before the mother’s death, they removed her from bed despite guidance not to.
After the mother’s passing, they stole her portable oxygen concentrator, wheelchair, and a keepsake item.
The reviewer urges others to avoid this “home” at all costs.
Review
Evergreen Residence is best suited for seniors who prefer an intimate, home-like environment where caregivers are familiar with residents and the owner is regularly present. The small scale naturally delivers more personalized attention, consistent routines, and real access to leadership when issues arise. It works well for a resident who prioritizes direct contact with staff, flexible room arrangements, and dependable daily care over a wide array of structured activities or a bustling campus atmosphere. Families nearby will likely appreciate the ease of communication and the sense of accountability that comes with a hands-on owner in the building.
Those weighing alternatives should consider that this community may not fit someone seeking robust programming, formal medical oversight, or comprehensive safety systems typical of larger facilities. For families located far away or requiring rigorous, transparent record-keeping and regular medical updates, Evergreen’s smaller footprint can feel opaque or uneven. A more expansive campus with scheduled activities, steadier staffing shifts, and documented communications may be preferable when a higher level of administrative rigor and third-party oversight is essential.
From the positive side, caregivers are noted to deliver substantial personal attention, and the owner’s daily presence provides a clear line of communication for problems or questions. The environment is described as clean, and rooms are generous, one resident had a well-sized room with a private patio and the option to rearrange in a way that suits the family’s preferences. Residents reportedly enjoy good meals, with firsthand confirmation that food quality is a highlight. These elements, taken together, create a sense of reassurance for families who value a calm, homelike setting and direct access to leadership.
However, the main drawbacks carry meaningful weight. Activity offerings can be limited, with staff burdened by a small team and broad duties, so engagement often hinges on resident participation or external scheduling. Beyond day-to-day care, concerns about governance, record-keeping, and transparency have appeared in the feedback. Serious questions about medical updates, documentation, and how care decisions are communicated to families can erode trust, especially when a loved one’s health or safety changes rapidly. In one account, issues escalated to allegations of unsafe handling and unapproved changes in care, underscoring the risk of relying on a small operation without external checks.
The key pro, personalized, attentive care, does offset some risk for residents who prioritize warmth, familiarity, and quick access to the owner. Yet the seriousness of the cited governance and safety concerns cannot be dismissed. For families where reliable documentation, consistent medical oversight, and proactive safety protocols are non-negotiable, Evergreen requires thorough due diligence and concrete assurances before a commitment is made. The decision hinges on balancing the comfort of a small, attentive home with the imperative for transparent operations, clear records, and dependable medical communication.
If Evergreen is under consideration, a disciplined due-diligence process should follow. Schedule multiple visits at different times to observe care dynamics and resident engagement, and insist on meeting the owner plus the primary caregiving team. Request copies of intake, care plans, and any medical oversight policies, along with a clear protocol for updating family members, preferably in real time or with a defined cadence. Verify staffing ratios, background checks, and staff turnover, and speak with independent references or regulators about any past concerns. Finally, compare with larger facilities that offer similar proximity to family, more structured programming, and explicit safety assurances, so the final choice rests on both the emotional fit and the assurance of transparent, accountable care.







Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.
An Extensive Exploration of the VA Aid and Attendance Benefit