258 Vestry Road, Perkinston, MS 39573
To contact a resident: (601) 945-5053
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Eva’s Place Costs & Pricing
At Eva's Place, the monthly costs for both semi-private and private rooms are competitively aligned with the pricing in Stone County, where residents can expect to pay $2,500 for a semi-private room and $3,000 for a private room. This pricing remains consistent at the county level, mirroring the figures observed at Eva's Place. However, when we look at the broader state context of Mississippi, it becomes evident that the costs at Eva's Place offer significant savings; semi-private rooms in Mississippi average $3,189, and private rooms can reach up to $3,581. As such, choosing Eva's Place not only ensures quality care but also represents a financially prudent decision for prospective residents and their families.
| Floor plans | Eva’s Place | Stone County | Mississippi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,500 | $2,500 | $3,189 |
| Private | $3,000 | $3,000 | $3,581 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Lemoyne Place
$2,500 / month22.9 miles away -
from +$300 / mo
Settler's Pointe Personal Care Home
$2,800 to $3,100 / month22.2 miles away
Overall Review of Eva’s Place
Pros
She was found alive on Sunday morning.- The staff took very good care of him until the end.
- They helped the family more than they will ever know.
- The staff at Eva's Place has been a godsend during a very difficult time.
- She is well kept, always clean and well fed.
Cons
The aunt with dementia was allowed outside without supervision and subsequently went missing.- He was a handful to take care of later in life.
Review
Eva’s Place in Perkinston, Mississippi is best suited for families seeking a smaller, home-like assisted living where caregivers deliver steady, personal attention, reliable daily routines, and hands-on help with activities of daily living. The reviews consistently highlight a facility that keeps residents clean and well fed, and where staff members are responsive to family needs during challenging transitions. This is the option for families that value a warm, approachable caregiving team and a lived-in, practical environment over flashy amenities, provided the loved one can thrive with regular supervision and manageable levels of medical support.
Those who should consider alternatives are families prioritizing intensive memory care and rigorous safety protocols. For a person with dementia or wandering risk, the incident described where a resident briefly went outdoors unsupervised underscores a real safety concern. In settings where wander-prevention, secure outdoor spaces, and formal memory-care programming are non-negotiable, a facility with stronger dementia-focused infrastructure may be a more appropriate fit. Likewise, if comprehensive medical oversight, larger staffing pools, or a broader range of therapeutic activities are essential, it pays to compare Eva’s Place with other communities that offer more explicit programs in those areas.
The strongest positives in Eva’s Place lie in the human touch and everyday stewardship. Reviews repeatedly praise staff for easing families through tough times, including end-of-life care, and for taking good care of residents when transitions become overwhelming. The mother’s weeks there are described as being managed with care, ensuring she stays clean, is well fed, and is kept comfortable. When family members face emotional strain, the presence of a compassionate, accessible staff can make a profound difference, and that relational reliability is a meaningful asset in an area where genuine caregiving can be hard to find.
Yet the facility’s shortcomings are noticeable and should not be downplayed. The most concerning point is the risk management around wandering and unmonitored access to outdoor spaces, which can have serious consequences for memory-impaired residents. A second caveat is the variability inherent in a small community; at least one reviewer indicates there isn’t enough information to render a full judgment about overall quality, while others confirm strong personal experiences. Taken together, these factors suggest that families must carefully verify the safety protocols, staff ratios, and day-to-day routines before committing, especially for residents with cognitive impairment.
Despite the drawbacks, the pros offset the cons in meaningful, concrete ways for the right resident. When a loved one relies on daily assistance and a reliable meal plan, Eva’s Place delivers a dependable baseline of quality that translates into real peace of mind for families. The staff’s commitment during emotionally charged periods, billing, transitions, and bereavement in some cases, eases the burden and often becomes the determining factor in deciding to place a relative there. Cleanliness, nutrition, and the consistent impression of attentiveness contribute substantially to quality of life, even if safety questions require ongoing scrutiny.
The practical takeaway is clear. Eva’s Place offers a solid, compassionate option for seniors who need regular help, enjoy a homey environment, and can function within a setting where family involvement and clear care plans are part of the package. For families with a loved one who has dementia or wandering tendencies, proceed with a rigorous safety audit: request detailed wandering-management policies, confirm staff training specifics, observe outdoor supervision practices, and ask to see an actual care plan geared to memory care. If those assurances are met, Eva’s Place can be a trustworthy home that balances warmth with practicality; if not, alternatives with stronger dementia-focused safeguards should be pursued.
Board and Care Home
Activities on-site
Beautician on-site
Devotional services on-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Private
Respite or short term stays offered
Wheelchair accessible showers
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Meals provided
Weight Training for Seniors: Building Strength and Vitality
Understanding the Sandwich Generation: Stress and Responsibilities for Multigenerational Caregivers
8 Essential Assistive Devices for Older Adults