1315 12Th Avenue North, Minneapolis, MN 55411
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Olu's Home
Pros
They have great staff in a well-designed building.- They are an absolutely wonderful organization; for child care or PCA, they are the company to trust.
Cons
The staff are very horrible, especially management.- The staff are bad and neglectful; medications were stolen.
- Staff smoke weed on the premises.
- There are cockroaches and no food.
- The organization is money-driven.
- They are racist against light-skinned people.
- They do not care for anyone.
- They restrict vacations and take away personal freedoms.
Review
Olu's Home in Minneapolis is best suited for families who can stay actively involved in daily care and who are comfortable navigating a facility that can feel basic and uneven in its execution. This community may work for a resident who can tolerate variable staff performance while a family advocates for timely, respectful attention. Those who need reliable medical monitoring, consistent meals, and a culture of dignity should not rely on Olu's Home without a concrete oversight plan and a willingness to re-evaluate quickly if standards slip. Affordability alone is not enough to justify staying long-term.
Two recurring threads show up in reviews: a well-designed building that could support safe movement and, in some shifts, staff who can be capable when present. A minority of families describe prompt assistance and kindness from caregivers. Yet these positives are inconsistent and do not appear to anchor the facility’s overall performance. The contrast between promising physical spaces and unstable caregiving creates a dangerous mismatch for anyone relying on steady, trustworthy support.
The dominant concerns are hard to ignore. Multiple reviewers allege neglectful staff and management, with claims of medication mishandling or theft and even drug use by staff in the driveway. Reports of discriminatory attitudes and comments about race circulating among caregivers raise alarms about culture and safety. Food quality and meal service are described as lacking, compounding everyday quality-of-life worries. Add in high staff turnover and repeated references to a single caring employee being pushed away, and the picture becomes one of destabilized care rather than dependable daily support.
Can the positives offset the negatives? In practical terms, they do not. A solid physical plant and episodic helpfulness cannot compensate for ongoing safety risks, disrespectful treatment, and careless operations. The core expectation of assisted living, consistent, compassionate help with daily living, appears undermined by the reported patterns of neglect, medication lapses, and a culture that leaves residents at risk of being overlooked. That disconnect makes a convincing case that the worst reviews reflect ongoing weaknesses rather than isolated incidents.
Families evaluating Olu's Home should demand concrete assurances before any move. A thorough, written care plan, documented medication administration procedures, and current inspection results are essential. Unscheduled visits focusing on mealtime service, housekeeping, and responsiveness provide a more realistic read on daily life. Check with Minnesota's licensing authority for any cited violations, seek candid feedback from current residents or their families about food, safety, and staff interactions, and confirm policies on resident autonomy, vacation time, and personal choice. If feasible, arrange a short trial stay to observe cadence and response under typical daily pressure.
Bottom line: Olu's Home represents a risky choice for most seniors and families seeking steady, respectful care. It is most appropriate for those who can sustain rigorous oversight and accept the possibility of turnover and service gaps, or for those prioritizing affordability above all and willing to accept perceptible uncertainties. For the majority, those looking for predictable routines, reliable medication management, and a consistently supportive staff, the likely outcome is to explore alternatives with stronger staffing fidelity, clearer care protocols, and a proven track record of resident well-being.
21 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Minneapolis-St Paul International (9 miles away)
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs