2318 55th Ave N, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
To contact a resident: (763) 561-3434
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Jmkay Health Care Services Inc Costs & Pricing
Jmkay Health Care Services Inc offers private room accommodations at a monthly rate of $7,000, which exceeds both the Hennepin County average of $5,580 and the broader state average for Minnesota, which stands at $5,090. This pricing reflects Jmkay's commitment to providing high-quality care and comprehensive services tailored to individual needs. While it may be on the higher end compared to local and state norms, potential clients can expect an elevated level of personalized attention and specialized resources that justify this premium investment in their health care experience.
| Floor plans | Jmkay Health Care Services Inc | Hennepin County | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $7,000 | $5,580 | $5,090 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$1000 / mo
Legacy Care Home
$6,000 / month12.3 miles away -
from +$500 / mo
Rivers of Life Memory Care/Enhanced Assisted Living
$7,500 / month21.4 miles away -
from +$650 / mo
Artis Senior Living of Woodbury
$7,650 / month20.4 miles away -
from -$1300 / mo
Cherrywood Pointe Of Plymouth
$5,700 to $9,450 / month10.0 miles away -
About the same
The Moments Of Lakeville
$7,200 / month23.6 miles away
Overall Review of Jmkay Health Care Services Inc
Cons
They attempted to entrap their partner in this place and illegally claimed she wasn't allowed to leave.- They tried to force her to pay $900 in rent after not disclosing that rent would be required.
- They claimed she would be covered by GRH, which does not cover rent, only moving costs.
- The reviewer described this as horrific malpractice.
- They warned others not to move there.
Review
Jmkay Health Care Services Inc in Brooklyn Center, MN is best suited for residents and families who want a tightly controlled environment and are prepared to aggressively verify every charge and policy. The few published impressions describe a setting where rules are applied with rigidity, and where the burden to prove promises versus expenses falls largely on the family. In practical terms, this facility may appeal to those who value clear, enforceable boundaries and are willing to confront opaque billing or disputed discharge rights rather than seek a cooperative, fully transparent care plan.
Those who should seriously consider alternatives are families prioritizing resident autonomy, straightforward pricing, and transparent management. The reviews raise caution flags about coercive-sounding tactics and hidden costs, creating substantial risk for seniors who rely on honest billing and clear discharge processes. For such seniors, facilities with explicit resident-rights policies, predictable contracts, and a documented history of fair, open communication are likely to deliver more peace of mind and fewer legal-tinged surprises.
Pros in this context are hard to discern from the available feedback. A 3-star rating implies there may be some acceptable, baseline functionality, but the lack of detail makes any positive takeaway effectively unusable for a real-world decision. The 1-star account, by contrast, centers on allegations of entrapment, attempts to block departure, and an unlawful-feeling demand for rent that was not disclosed upfront, plus a disputed claim about GRH coverage. In practical terms, the alleged harms overwhelm any potential benefits, undermining confidence in the facility’s integrity and resident-centered focus.
To protect a family’s interests, demand rigorous written disclosures on all charges, including any rent, move-in or transfer costs, and the exact terms of the admission agreement. Verify licensing status and check for formal complaints through state regulators, and request to review discharge policies and resident-rights documentation. Insist on a transparent, no-surprise budgeting process and a clearly defined protocol for leaving the community. When possible, observe how staff discuss rights and options with residents and families, and seek independent confirmation of any promises before signing anything.
When benchmarking against alternatives, prioritize facilities that publish clear price sheets, separate living costs from services, and explicitly spell out when and how residents can move or transfer without penalty. Compare the level of resident autonomy, the permissiveness of exit rights, and the consistency of staff-patient interactions. Look for facilities with open incident reporting, routine family communications, and third-party reviews that corroborate positive caregiving experiences. A setting that cannot demonstrate transparent billing and respectful, rights-respecting practices should be set aside in favor of options with verifiable trust and accountability.
In sum, the combination of reported behavior and ambiguous positives creates a high-risk profile for Jmkay Health Care Services Inc. This is not a choice to be made lightly. For most families, seizing the opportunity to explore alternatives with transparent pricing, clear resident rights, and a demonstrable commitment to ethical care will yield far greater confidence and downstream peace of mind. If proceeding with this community, require exhaustive written terms, independent verification of all representations, and a formal agreement that unambiguously protects the resident’s freedom to depart and access moving support without punitive charges.
Board and Care Home
Private
Minneapolis-St Paul International (13 miles away)
Small 21-bed community with comprehensive care and on-site dining, activities, and 24-hour supervision.
Encouraging Participation in Adult Day Care: A Guide to Supporting a Hesitant Parent
Comprehensive Exploration of Living Wills and Other Advance Directives
A Detailed Exploration of Living Wills and Advance Directives