1210 East College Drive #800, Marshall, MN 56258
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Touching Hearts Home Care Costs & Pricing
Touching Hearts Home Care offers competitive pricing for its services, particularly when compared to the broader market in Redwood County and the state of Minnesota. For instance, their studio apartment is priced at $2,849 per month, which aligns with the county's rate but remains significantly lower than the state average of $3,617. In contrast, their one-bedroom option is set at $4,173 per month; while this matches the county's cost, it appears higher than the state average of $2,893. This pricing structure suggests that Touching Hearts Home Care provides a valuable balance between quality care and affordability, making it an attractive choice for those seeking both comfort and financial sensibility in their living arrangements.
| Floor plans | Touching Hearts Home Care | Redwood County | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $2,849 | $2,849 | $3,617 |
| 1 Bedroom | $4,173 | $4,173 | $2,893 |
Overall Review of Touching Hearts Home Care
Pros
The care provided was wonderful and compassionate.- Touching Hearts at Home caregivers were a blessing to the parents.
- The caregivers were very flexible as time went on and care needs changed.
- The caregivers themselves were very compassionate.
- The parents were able to stay in their own home together for three years longer than they would have otherwise.
- The caregivers are absolutely wonderful, kind, and caring, and were the perfect fit for the mother.
Review
Touching Hearts Home Care in Marshall, MN is best suited for families who want to keep a loved one at home with highly person-centered, adaptable assistance. It serves seniors whose priority is independence, safety, and continuity of familiar routines, with care that can scale up or down as conditions change. The strongest fit is for clients who value compassionate, one-on-one attention from caregivers who can flex their schedule and approach to match evolving needs, allowing aging in place without rushing a move to a facility.
Alternatives should be considered by those who require round-the-clock medical oversight, intensive memory care, or a built-in social program that a facility provides. If someone needs constant supervision, a traditional assisted living or nursing home might offer more structured security and built-in peer interactions. Families prioritizing social opportunities or a more campus-like environment may find a traditional community more aligned with those goals.
The core positives are clear in the experiences shared: caregivers who are genuinely compassionate and a service that feels like a blessing to families. The flexibility to adjust as care needs evolve is repeatedly highlighted, and the outcome, seniors staying in their own home together for years longer than expected, speaks to the practical value. These strengths directly address the practical burdens of aging in place: reducing moves, maintaining familiar routines, and preserving dignity through patient, personalized support.
However, any in-home model hinges on the reliability and continuity of the caregiving team. While reviews praise flexibility, families should probe how back-up coverage is handled, caregiver turnover, and how coordination across different caregivers is managed day to day. The lack of a centralized community space means less built-in social programming than a facility, which can matter for some clients. Where expectations include constant proximity to staff or 24/7 on-site supervision, alternatives may be more suitable.
For Marshall families contemplating options, the decision hinges on whether the goal is maximal time at home with intimate, responsive care, versus a more structured living arrangement with broader social opportunities. The testimonials portray a warm, client-focused model where the caregivers' kindness translates into real, measurable benefits, the kind of care that lets a loved one live with more comfort and less disruption. To move forward, request a clear plan: home-care team assignments, shift coverage, emergency protocols, and a roadmap for increasing care intensity if needs rise.
Bottom line: Touching Hearts Home Care represents a practical, compassionate choice for those who value aging-in-place with flexible, attentive support in Marshall. It is less suited for families needing constant professional supervision on-site or extensive memory-care programming within a community. Pros strongly offset the typical trade-offs of in-home care by delivering genuine kindness and adaptability, as reflected in the lived outcomes of staying at home longer. Families should schedule a consultation to map out caregiving teams, continuity plans, and costs, ensuring alignment with the loved one’s health trajectory and daily living preferences.
21 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living