Good Life Senior Living Hugo Costs & Pricing
Good Life Senior Living in Hugo offers a range of living options at competitive price points, reflecting the quality and amenities provided. For a studio unit, residents can expect to pay between $4,795 and $6,250 per month, which is notably higher than both the county average of $4,066 and the state average of $3,617. In contrast, the one-bedroom option is priced at $5,695, significantly exceeding the Washington County average of $2,771 and Minnesota's state average of $2,893. These costs suggest that while Good Life Senior Living may come with a premium price tag compared to its surroundings, residents are likely paying for enhanced services and facilities designed to support their senior living needs.
| Floor plans | Good Life Senior Living Hugo | Washington County | Minnesota |
|---|
| Studio | $4,795 to $6,250 | $4,066 | $3,617 |
| 1 Bedroom | $5,695 | $2,771 | $2,893 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$500 / mo
Keystone Place at LaValle Fields
$4,295 to $5,695 / month
1.8 miles away
-
from -$895 / mo
NorBella Champlin
$3,900 / month
19.3 miles away
-
from +$510 / mo
Cherrywood Pointe Of Roseville
$5,305 / month
11.6 miles away
-
from -$670 / mo
Blaine White Pine Senior Lvg
$4,125 to $5,400 / month
10.3 miles away
-
from -$865 / mo
York Gardens Senior Living
$3,930 to $4,770 / month
24.3 miles away
Overall Review of Good Life Senior Living Hugo
caveat
5 reviews mention this
Staffing and safety concerns recur
Some reviewers report short staffing and safety lapses.
A few reviews describe being short staffed, including one family who said they had to call EMTs after noticing delays in response. Others describe incidents involving residents with dementia or memory issues, including wandering concerns and delayed awareness when someone was out of place. One reviewer also mentions high staff turnover and management being unresponsive to residents’ needs. These reports stand out because they directly involve supervision and resident safety.
common
6 reviews mention this
Staff care and communication stand out
Families describe staff who communicate and follow through.
Several reviewers highlight frequent check-ins and consistent attention, including one account that says staff checked on a resident every 2–3 hours. Multiple families also mention clear responsiveness when they had questions, including prompt phone calls and detailed answers during the search process. Reviews further describe administrative help with complicated insurance paperwork and ongoing engagement with families. Overall, the positive comments about communication and follow-through are a major theme in the reviews.
common
6 reviews mention this
Facility feels clean and home-like
Many reviews describe a clean, comfortable, home-like setting.
Residents and families frequently mention the facility is clean and maintained well, with some describing a comfort level that feels like home. A number of reviews also mention a warm, welcoming environment rather than an institutional feel. One reviewer specifically notes residents still having access to social spaces like the cafeteria, where people appeared to be laughing and eating together. While there are negative outliers, the cleanliness and “home-like” feel comes up repeatedly in the praise.
common
8 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Reviews consistently mention engaging daily activities.
Many reviewers say the community offers plenty to do, including regular activities for residents to join. Several comments describe staff planning themed events and programs, and others mention residents participating happily in social activities. One review also mentions devotional and educational-style offerings, along with performances and stretching or yoga-type programming. Across the reviews, activity variety is part of what helps residents feel settled.
common
6 reviews mention this
Food quality gets frequent praise
Dining is a frequently praised part of daily life.
Reviewers regularly mention that the food is good, tasty, and prepared onsite, with some specifically calling out the chef’s attentiveness. A few comments also describe a strong selection of meal options, including desserts. One reviewer ties food to the overall decision-making process by saying they asked to see the meal quality during their visit. The dining experience appears to be a consistent point of satisfaction.
differentiator
3 reviews mention this
Support through end-of-life care
Multiple reviews describe staying supported through end-of-life.
Some families say the care experience allowed a loved one to remain there rather than transferring out as health needs advanced. Reviews also describe support during late stages, including comfort-focused care when families could not be present. One reviewer specifically frames the experience around end-of-life continuity, while others mention how staff helped make final moments and difficult transitions more manageable for families.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.