Westgate Apartments in Hibbing, MN

Senior living communities with a similar price nearby

• from +$35 / mo

  Raintree West

  3.9 from 14 reviews

  $595 to $700 / month

  19.1 miles away
• About the same

  Birchwood East

  3.5 from 16 reviews

  $563 to $699 / month

  21.2 miles away
• from -$19 / mo

  Southview

  3.4 from 14 reviews

  $541 / month

  2.4 miles away
• from -$45 / mo

  Birch Court

  3.1 from 14 reviews

  $515 to $4,500 / month

  0.9 miles away
• from +$54 / mo

  Eastview

  4.1 from 8 reviews

  $614 to $682 / month

  20.3 miles away

Pros

• The new management has turned the place around.
• There are many things everyone can enjoy in all areas of the building.
• It is the best apartment place in Hibbing to live in.
• It has been a nice place since the new management took over.
• The management has been good to residents.
• It is very clean and well managed.

Cons

• The building is the noisiest apartment building the reviewer has ever lived in.
• Hallways constantly smell of mold, mildew and rotting garbage, which is described as disgusting.
• Hallways are vacuumed only once every two years.
• Management expects residents to clean the building.
• The building can't keep a manager for more than eight months, and its rules change like the wind.
• It is advised to avoid this place.
• The management has booted out all of the potheads and pedophiles.

Review

Westgate Apartments in Hibbing is best suited for renters who want to ride along with a concrete management turnaround and who prize cleaner common areas, consistent rule enforcement, and a safer-feeling environment over pristine first impressions. The buildingā€™s recent history matters here: prior management left a wake of complaints about noise, odors, and lax maintenance; the current leadership appears to have stabilized operations, tightened rules, and focused on cleaning and resident conduct. For families and individuals who value a well-kept building and a landlord that acts, not merely promises, Westgate offers a credible path from uncertain to reliable.

Those who should consider alternatives are residents chasing near-perfect quiet and pristine interiors. The strongest caution arises from complaints about hallways with odors resembling mold, mildew, and garbage, and a building that felt neglected in cleaning choreography in the past. While new management has made strides, the history of turnover and inconsistent upkeep makes this property less predictable than peers that advertise ongoing maintenance and better acoustics. People who cannot tolerate even occasional disturbances, or who need steady, long-term staff in place, will want to compare other Hibbing options before signing.

On the plus side, the new management reined in problematic behaviors and began enforcing lease rules, which transformed the community atmosphere. Several reviewers describe the building as much cleaner and better managed since the turnover, with residents noting easier access to courteous, responsive staff and more predictable maintenance. A major offset to the earlier concerns is the clear signal that safety and civility matter here, one post highlights the removal of troubling tenants. Those factors substantially mitigate the worst aspects of the old regime and produce a tangible sense of reliability in day-to-day living.

Still, the strength of the turnaround cannot erase every caveat. The most negative observerā€™s note about pervasive odors and infrequent cleaning in common areas isnā€™t fully negated by new policies, and some residents remain wary after years of mixed signals from leadership. Noise remains a potential issue in a multi-unit building with older construction, and the experiences of early residents show that benefits hinge on ongoing staff continuity and consistent maintenance investment. Prospective renters should not assume perfection but should expect active, current management, transparent rule enforcement, and visible upkeep to be demonstrably ongoing.

Practical due diligence matters: seek a current tour focused on common areas, the condition of hallways, and the responsiveness of maintenance. Ask for specifics on how often common areas are cleaned, what constitutes ā€œenforcementā€ of lease rules, and how quickly repairs are completed. Listen to current residentsā€™ reports about noise, security, and the ease of getting issues resolved. If the tenancy requires a quiet, pristine environment or if dependable 24/7 staff is non-negotiable, this may still be a decision to pass or to treat cautiously with a short-term lease until confidence is proven.

The bottom line: Westgate Apartments now presents as a markedly more reliable option than the prior regime and a credible choice for tenants who value cleaner spaces and stricter governance. Its best-case fit is a resident who can tolerate an older building with potential residual noise and odor concerns but who benefits from a hands-on, enforcement-forward management team and a cleaner, safer-feeling community. Those needing absolute quiet, flawless cleanliness from day one, or who require continual, predictable maintenance from an unflinching team every week, should explore alternatives with stronger track records. For the right renter, this property offers real progress and a practical, lived-in value.