7330 Lansing Avenue, Jackson, MI 49201
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Pleasant Manor II Costs & Pricing
Pleasant Manor II offers competitive pricing for its accommodations when compared to both Jackson County and the broader Michigan state averages. For private rooms, Pleasant Manor II's monthly rate of $3,000 is notably lower than the county average of $3,755 and even below the state average of $3,675. This positions it as an appealing option for those seeking individual living spaces at a more accessible price point. In terms of semi-private rooms, Pleasant Manor II maintains its competitive edge with a rate of $3,000, which is higher than the county's average of $2,777 but significantly less than Michigan's average of $3,191. Overall, Pleasant Manor II presents itself as a cost-effective choice for residents in search of quality living arrangements in a caring environment.
| Floor plans | Pleasant Manor II | Jackson County | Michigan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $2,777 | $3,189 |
| Private | $3,000 | $3,755 | $3,674 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Pleasant Manor II
Pros
The staff do a good job.
The people are great.
The food is great.
The care is superb.
The home environment feels like a loving family.
Pleasant Manor is highly recommended.
The meals are really good.
Cons
The staff were terrible and the facility was understaffed.
Workers were paid next to nothing.
Residents were starved, mistreated, and abused.
Families should not bring their loved ones there.
Review
Pleasant Manor II in Jackson, MI is best suited for families seeking a warm, home-like AFC setting where daily personal care is consistently visible, meals are engaging, and staff interact closely with residents. This community excels for seniors who thrive on regular routines, frequent touchpoints with caregivers, and clear, ongoing communication with family members. It is a strong fit for someone who does not require intensive medical oversight and favors a smaller, intimate environment where “family” feels real and residents are treated with daily consistency, bed changes, baths, and clothes changes included. Those needing robust medical monitoring, complex dementia programming, or high-security measures may want to consider alternatives that offer more medical depth and formalized care networks.
The most compelling positives are evident in the daily experience. Care is described by families as superb, with staff who are genuinely caring and accessible, and meals received as high quality. The routine of daily bed changes, bathing, and wardrobe changes signals reliable attention to core needs, while the overall atmosphere is repeatedly characterized as friendly and attentive. Families feel that Pleasant Manor II is more than a facility; it functions like a caring, small community where residents are known well, and staff take pride in their duties. This combination makes it an attractive option for relatives who want visible dedication and a consistent caregiving tempo.
Communication and family involvement stand out as concrete strengths. Several reviews emphasize that the community keeps families in the loop about changes in a loved one’s condition, and that staff are approachable and helpful. The sense of belonging extends beyond caregiving to social connection and engagement; one account highlights how a family member contributed music, underscoring that Pleasant Manor II values resident happiness as part of daily life. The overall narrative is that the home operates like a supportive extended family, where residents are treated with warmth and where families feel welcomed and respected.
Yet one review injects a cautionary note about staffing realities. The claim centers on understaffing, underpayment of workers, and mistreatment as a stark counterpoint to the prevailing positivity. That perspective is grave and should not be ignored, but it stands apart from the broader chorus of praise and the long-standing resident experiences cited by other families. This is a reminder to assess staffing stability in real time during visits, to ask about nurse availability and turnover, and to verify how care plans are adjusted when demand spikes. While alarming, the outlier does not erase the consistent, positive indicators present in the majority of reviews.
Those strong points do offset the concern to an extent, but not perfectly. The warmth, attentiveness, and family-like culture provide meaningful protection against the kinds of gaps that can arise in smaller settings. Families consistently report that residents are well cared for, well fed, and well integrated into a social fabric that supports emotional well-being. However, any signal about staffing variability should prompt prospective residents to verify current ratios, management availability, and the facility’s contingency plans. In practice, Pleasant Manor II delivers a compellingly humane environment, but the prudent purchaser will conduct a direct, current staffing inquiry and seek current references before making final decisions.
For families weighing options, Pleasant Manor II is a compelling choice for those prioritizing a personable, homey setting with dependable daily care and active family engagement. It is less suited for those who require strong medical oversight, advanced memory-care programming, or guaranteed staffing consistency at all hours. The prudent path is to schedule a tour, observe shift changes, and speak with several current families about their experiences. Ask pointed questions about staff-to-resident ratios, turnover, and how the team handles spikes in need. If warmth, daily personal care, and a true sense of community are non-negotiables, Pleasant Manor II stands out as a practical, capable option worth pursuing.











How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing